光固化装置和抗菌漱口水对牙龈色复合树脂物理性能的影响

T. C. Dotta, L. A. Almeida, M. M. Arnez, Raisa Castelo, D. Ugarte, A. Reis, A. Catirse
{"title":"光固化装置和抗菌漱口水对牙龈色复合树脂物理性能的影响","authors":"T. C. Dotta, L. A. Almeida, M. M. Arnez, Raisa Castelo, D. Ugarte, A. Reis, A. Catirse","doi":"10.11606/ISSN.2357-8041.CLRD.2021.180868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study evaluated surface roughness (Ra) and color difference (ΔE00) of a gingiva-colored composite resin (NT Premium Gengiva, Coltene), light-activated with three light curing units (LCU) and immersed in different mouthwash solutions. Methods: 90 composite specimens (n=10) were divided according to the LCU: L1-Valo, L2-Bluephase and L3-Optilight Max; and solution: S1-alcohol-based antiseptic mouthwash (Listerine Cool Mint), S2-alcohol-free antiseptic mouthwash (Listerine Cool Mint Zero Alcohol) and S3-water (control). Immersions were performed for 30 s, 2x/day, for 21 days. Ra and coordinates of luminosity (L*) and color (a* and b*) were measured using a rugosimeter (SJ-201 P/M) and a spectrophotometer (SP62S), respectively, at: T0-start, T1-7 days, T2-14 days and T3-21 days. Results: L1 (1.3±0.9) presented higher Ra than L3 (0.7±0.6) and L2 (1.0±0.8); and Ra for S2 (0.9±0.1) was greater than S3 (-0.1±0.1), and S1 (0.1±0.1). Moreover, L1 (23.3±0.3) presented lower ΔE00 t han L 2 (24.7±0.3) a nd L 3 (25.1±0.3). Conclusion: Ra of the gingiva-colored composite resin tested increased when L1 and S2 were used, although L1-cured specimens also showed the lowest ΔE00.","PeriodicalId":10204,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Laboratorial Research in Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of light curing unit and antiseptic mouthwashes on the physical properties of gingiva-colored composite resin\",\"authors\":\"T. C. Dotta, L. A. Almeida, M. M. Arnez, Raisa Castelo, D. Ugarte, A. Reis, A. Catirse\",\"doi\":\"10.11606/ISSN.2357-8041.CLRD.2021.180868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This study evaluated surface roughness (Ra) and color difference (ΔE00) of a gingiva-colored composite resin (NT Premium Gengiva, Coltene), light-activated with three light curing units (LCU) and immersed in different mouthwash solutions. Methods: 90 composite specimens (n=10) were divided according to the LCU: L1-Valo, L2-Bluephase and L3-Optilight Max; and solution: S1-alcohol-based antiseptic mouthwash (Listerine Cool Mint), S2-alcohol-free antiseptic mouthwash (Listerine Cool Mint Zero Alcohol) and S3-water (control). Immersions were performed for 30 s, 2x/day, for 21 days. Ra and coordinates of luminosity (L*) and color (a* and b*) were measured using a rugosimeter (SJ-201 P/M) and a spectrophotometer (SP62S), respectively, at: T0-start, T1-7 days, T2-14 days and T3-21 days. Results: L1 (1.3±0.9) presented higher Ra than L3 (0.7±0.6) and L2 (1.0±0.8); and Ra for S2 (0.9±0.1) was greater than S3 (-0.1±0.1), and S1 (0.1±0.1). Moreover, L1 (23.3±0.3) presented lower ΔE00 t han L 2 (24.7±0.3) a nd L 3 (25.1±0.3). Conclusion: Ra of the gingiva-colored composite resin tested increased when L1 and S2 were used, although L1-cured specimens also showed the lowest ΔE00.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Laboratorial Research in Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Laboratorial Research in Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11606/ISSN.2357-8041.CLRD.2021.180868\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Laboratorial Research in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/ISSN.2357-8041.CLRD.2021.180868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究对三种光固化单元(LCU)光活化并浸泡在不同漱口水溶液中的牙龈色复合树脂(NT Premium Gengiva, Coltene)的表面粗糙度(Ra)和色差(ΔE00)进行了评价。方法:90份复合标本(n=10)按LCU分为:L1-Valo、L2-Bluephase和L3-Optilight Max;溶液:s1 -含酒精的抗菌漱口水(李斯特林清凉薄荷),s2 -不含酒精的抗菌漱口水(李斯特林清凉薄荷零酒精)和s3 -水(对照)。浸泡30 s, 2次/天,共21天。分别用光度计(SJ-201 P/M)和分光光度计(SP62S)在T0-start、t1 - 7d、t2 - 14d和t3 - 21d测量Ra和光度坐标(L*)和颜色坐标(a*和b*)。结果:L1(1.3±0.9)高于L3(0.7±0.6)和L2(1.0±0.8);Ra在S2组(0.9±0.1)大于S3组(-0.1±0.1),S1组(0.1±0.1)。L1(23.3±0.3)的ΔE00 t低于l2(24.7±0.3)和l3(25.1±0.3)。结论:使用L1和S2时,牙龈色复合树脂的Ra升高,但L1固化的样品Ra也最低ΔE00。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of light curing unit and antiseptic mouthwashes on the physical properties of gingiva-colored composite resin
Objective: This study evaluated surface roughness (Ra) and color difference (ΔE00) of a gingiva-colored composite resin (NT Premium Gengiva, Coltene), light-activated with three light curing units (LCU) and immersed in different mouthwash solutions. Methods: 90 composite specimens (n=10) were divided according to the LCU: L1-Valo, L2-Bluephase and L3-Optilight Max; and solution: S1-alcohol-based antiseptic mouthwash (Listerine Cool Mint), S2-alcohol-free antiseptic mouthwash (Listerine Cool Mint Zero Alcohol) and S3-water (control). Immersions were performed for 30 s, 2x/day, for 21 days. Ra and coordinates of luminosity (L*) and color (a* and b*) were measured using a rugosimeter (SJ-201 P/M) and a spectrophotometer (SP62S), respectively, at: T0-start, T1-7 days, T2-14 days and T3-21 days. Results: L1 (1.3±0.9) presented higher Ra than L3 (0.7±0.6) and L2 (1.0±0.8); and Ra for S2 (0.9±0.1) was greater than S3 (-0.1±0.1), and S1 (0.1±0.1). Moreover, L1 (23.3±0.3) presented lower ΔE00 t han L 2 (24.7±0.3) a nd L 3 (25.1±0.3). Conclusion: Ra of the gingiva-colored composite resin tested increased when L1 and S2 were used, although L1-cured specimens also showed the lowest ΔE00.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信