对“输尿管软镜与微型经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的效果比较:配对分析”的评论。

IF 1.2 4区医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1806-9282.20221429

André Pontes-Silva

{"title":"对“输尿管软镜与微型经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的效果比较:配对分析”的评论。","authors":"André Pontes-Silva","doi":"10.1590/1806-9282.20221429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article entitled “Comparison of the outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones: a matched-pair analysis,” Rodrigues et al. 1 compared the outcomes of initial mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy. This study has scientific relevance; however, it did not answer an important question: does statistical significance (p<0.05) have clinical importance? A comparison of outcomes must consider the clinical relevance of the differences because the","PeriodicalId":21234,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira","volume":"69 2","pages":"215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d1/9f/1806-9282-ramb-69-02-0215.PMC9983478.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comments on \\\"Comparison of the outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones: a matched-pair analysis\\\".\",\"authors\":\"André Pontes-Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1806-9282.20221429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the article entitled “Comparison of the outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones: a matched-pair analysis,” Rodrigues et al. 1 compared the outcomes of initial mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy. This study has scientific relevance; however, it did not answer an important question: does statistical significance (p<0.05) have clinical importance? A comparison of outcomes must consider the clinical relevance of the differences because the\",\"PeriodicalId\":21234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira\",\"volume\":\"69 2\",\"pages\":\"215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d1/9f/1806-9282-ramb-69-02-0215.PMC9983478.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20221429\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20221429","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comments on "Comparison of the outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones: a matched-pair analysis".

In the article entitled “Comparison of the outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones: a matched-pair analysis,” Rodrigues et al. 1 compared the outcomes of initial mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy. This study has scientific relevance; however, it did not answer an important question: does statistical significance (p<0.05) have clinical importance? A comparison of outcomes must consider the clinical relevance of the differences because the

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira 医学-医学：内科

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

276

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： A Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (RAMB), editada pela Associação Médica Brasileira, desde 1954, tem por objetivo publicar artigos que contribuam para o conhecimento médico.