野生不育燕麦乙酰辅酶a羧化酶(ACCase)抑制剂除草剂抗性检测使用琼脂快速测试

Abdullatief Mohammed Abdurruhman, S. Uygur, F. Uygur
{"title":"野生不育燕麦乙酰辅酶a羧化酶(ACCase)抑制剂除草剂抗性检测使用琼脂快速测试","authors":"Abdullatief Mohammed Abdurruhman, S. Uygur, F. Uygur","doi":"10.17265/2161-6256/2018.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted using seeds in Petri dish containing agar medium in order to determine acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase) herbicides resistance (R) in Avena sterilis that was grown in wheat fields at Adana province, Turkey. Seeds were collected from one large suspected field, where clodinafop-propargyl (Aryloxyphenoxypropionate “FOPs”) and pinoxaden (Phenylpyrazoline “DEN”) have been applied for many years. Susceptible (S) population was collected from the road side on the same region. Agar media of concentration 14 g/L was prepared and it was melted in microwave. Then the amount of 20 mL agar media was added into each Petri dish. Five seeds were placed on agar mediums containing discriminating dose of clodinafop and pinoxaden. Petri dishes were placed in growth incubator operating at 10 °C. After 15 d, both radicle and hypocotyl length were measured. The percentage of germinated seed and dose-response curves were determined. At these different concentration levels, there were more than 50% of R and less than 40% of S seed germinated for pinoxaden. However, for clodinafop, more than 60% of R and less than 50% of S seeds were germinated. At higher concentration levels, the populations of resistant and susceptible were not germinated for both herbicides. The resistance value of R population was then compared with that of the S biotype. From the resistance index (RI), the population was more resistant to pinoxaden (7.43 for radicle and 2.47 for hypocotyl) than the clodinafop-propagyl (1.39 for radicle and 3.77 for hypocotyl). The method provided a simple, quick and cost effective way to identify ACCase herbicides resistance in most grass weeds.","PeriodicalId":14977,"journal":{"name":"Journal of agricultural science & technology A","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase (ACCase) Inhibitor Herbicides Resistance in Sterile Wild Oat (Avena sterilis L.) Using Agar Quick Test\",\"authors\":\"Abdullatief Mohammed Abdurruhman, S. Uygur, F. Uygur\",\"doi\":\"10.17265/2161-6256/2018.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was conducted using seeds in Petri dish containing agar medium in order to determine acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase) herbicides resistance (R) in Avena sterilis that was grown in wheat fields at Adana province, Turkey. Seeds were collected from one large suspected field, where clodinafop-propargyl (Aryloxyphenoxypropionate “FOPs”) and pinoxaden (Phenylpyrazoline “DEN”) have been applied for many years. Susceptible (S) population was collected from the road side on the same region. Agar media of concentration 14 g/L was prepared and it was melted in microwave. Then the amount of 20 mL agar media was added into each Petri dish. Five seeds were placed on agar mediums containing discriminating dose of clodinafop and pinoxaden. Petri dishes were placed in growth incubator operating at 10 °C. After 15 d, both radicle and hypocotyl length were measured. The percentage of germinated seed and dose-response curves were determined. At these different concentration levels, there were more than 50% of R and less than 40% of S seed germinated for pinoxaden. However, for clodinafop, more than 60% of R and less than 50% of S seeds were germinated. At higher concentration levels, the populations of resistant and susceptible were not germinated for both herbicides. The resistance value of R population was then compared with that of the S biotype. From the resistance index (RI), the population was more resistant to pinoxaden (7.43 for radicle and 2.47 for hypocotyl) than the clodinafop-propagyl (1.39 for radicle and 3.77 for hypocotyl). The method provided a simple, quick and cost effective way to identify ACCase herbicides resistance in most grass weeds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of agricultural science & technology A\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of agricultural science & technology A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-6256/2018.01.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of agricultural science & technology A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-6256/2018.01.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

为了测定在土耳其阿达纳省的麦田中种植的麦草对乙酰辅酶a羧化酶(ACCase)除草剂的抗性(R),本研究在含有琼脂培养基的培养皿中对麦草的种子进行了研究。种子采集自一大片疑似农田,该农田多年来一直使用氯硝福丙炔(芳基苯氧丙酸酯“FOPs”)和苯吡唑啉“DEN”。在同一地区的路边采集易感人群。制备浓度为14 g/L的琼脂培养基,微波融化。然后在每个培养皿中加入20 mL琼脂培养基。将5粒种子置于含有克地那福和匹诺莎鉴别剂量的琼脂培养基上。培养皿置于生长培养箱中,温度为10℃。15d后,测量胚根和下胚轴长度。测定了种子发芽率和剂量-反应曲线。在不同浓度水平下,匹诺沙登的R种子萌发率大于50%,S种子萌发率小于40%。而对于clodinafop, R种子的萌发率超过60%,S种子的萌发率不到50%。在较高浓度下,两种除草剂的抗性和敏感群体均不萌发。然后将R群体的抗性值与S生物型的抗性值进行比较。从抗性指数(RI)看,种群对匹诺沙登的抗性(根茎7.43,下胚轴2.47)高于对氯地那福-繁殖虫的抗性(根茎1.39,下胚轴3.77)。该方法为大多数禾本科杂草的ACCase抗性鉴定提供了一种简单、快速、经济的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detection of Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase (ACCase) Inhibitor Herbicides Resistance in Sterile Wild Oat (Avena sterilis L.) Using Agar Quick Test
This study was conducted using seeds in Petri dish containing agar medium in order to determine acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase) herbicides resistance (R) in Avena sterilis that was grown in wheat fields at Adana province, Turkey. Seeds were collected from one large suspected field, where clodinafop-propargyl (Aryloxyphenoxypropionate “FOPs”) and pinoxaden (Phenylpyrazoline “DEN”) have been applied for many years. Susceptible (S) population was collected from the road side on the same region. Agar media of concentration 14 g/L was prepared and it was melted in microwave. Then the amount of 20 mL agar media was added into each Petri dish. Five seeds were placed on agar mediums containing discriminating dose of clodinafop and pinoxaden. Petri dishes were placed in growth incubator operating at 10 °C. After 15 d, both radicle and hypocotyl length were measured. The percentage of germinated seed and dose-response curves were determined. At these different concentration levels, there were more than 50% of R and less than 40% of S seed germinated for pinoxaden. However, for clodinafop, more than 60% of R and less than 50% of S seeds were germinated. At higher concentration levels, the populations of resistant and susceptible were not germinated for both herbicides. The resistance value of R population was then compared with that of the S biotype. From the resistance index (RI), the population was more resistant to pinoxaden (7.43 for radicle and 2.47 for hypocotyl) than the clodinafop-propagyl (1.39 for radicle and 3.77 for hypocotyl). The method provided a simple, quick and cost effective way to identify ACCase herbicides resistance in most grass weeds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信