三氯生/共聚物/氟化钠牙膏控制口腔异味的临床效果:为期三周的临床试验

D. Hu, Y. Zhang, M. Petrone, A. Volpe, W. Devizio, H. Proskin
{"title":"三氯生/共聚物/氟化钠牙膏控制口腔异味的临床效果:为期三周的临床试验","authors":"D. Hu, Y. Zhang, M. Petrone, A. Volpe, W. Devizio, H. Proskin","doi":"10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01105_41.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a commercially available, clinically proven, American Dental Association (ADA)-Accepted dentifrice containing 0.30% triclosan, 2% polyvinylmethylether/maleic acid (PVM/MA) copolymer, and 0.243% sodium fluoride in a 10% high-cleaning silica base (Colgate Total Advanced Fresh) to a commercially available, clinically proven, ADA-Accepted control dentifrice containing 0.243% sodium fluoride in a silica base (Colgate Cavity Protection Winterfresh Gel) for the management of oral malodor in a 3-week, randomized, double-blind longitudinal clinical trial. A panel of four expert judges used a nine-point hedonic scale to evaluate breath odor using a protocol designed in concordance with the ADA Draft Acceptance Program Guidelines for Products Used in the Management of Oral Malodor. After a baseline evaluation, prospective study subjects who scored above the threshold value for unpleasant breath odor were stratified by score and randomized into two treatment groups. Subjects were provided with a soft-bristled toothbrush and brushed their teeth thoroughly in their regular and customary manner for 1 minute with their assigned dentifrice, twice daily. Before oral-malodor evaluations, the subjects refrained from eating odorigenic foods and did not use dental hygiene procedures, breath mints, or mouth rinses. Eighty-one adult men and women from Chengdu, China, completed the study. Throughout the study, the mean breath-odor scores observed in the Colgate Total Advanced Fresh toothpaste group for both daytime and overnight were within the range of values associated with pleasant breath odor, were statistically significantly lower than the corresponding mean scores for the control group, and also represented statistically significant reductions from baseline. Relative to the baseline score, more than 80% of the subjects in the Colgate Total Advanced Fresh toothpaste group demonstrated a 3.2 or more unit reduction in organoleptic scores at every postbaseline breath-odor evaluation. Thus, the overall results of the double-blind clinical study support the conclusions that Colgate Total Advanced Fresh toothpaste is efficacious for the control of oral malodor for up to 12 hours in the daytime and up to 12 hours overnight.","PeriodicalId":10569,"journal":{"name":"Compendium of continuing education in dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical effectiveness of a triclosan/copolymer/sodium-fluoride dentifrice in controlling oral malodor: a three-week clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"D. Hu, Y. Zhang, M. Petrone, A. Volpe, W. Devizio, H. Proskin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01105_41.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a commercially available, clinically proven, American Dental Association (ADA)-Accepted dentifrice containing 0.30% triclosan, 2% polyvinylmethylether/maleic acid (PVM/MA) copolymer, and 0.243% sodium fluoride in a 10% high-cleaning silica base (Colgate Total Advanced Fresh) to a commercially available, clinically proven, ADA-Accepted control dentifrice containing 0.243% sodium fluoride in a silica base (Colgate Cavity Protection Winterfresh Gel) for the management of oral malodor in a 3-week, randomized, double-blind longitudinal clinical trial. A panel of four expert judges used a nine-point hedonic scale to evaluate breath odor using a protocol designed in concordance with the ADA Draft Acceptance Program Guidelines for Products Used in the Management of Oral Malodor. After a baseline evaluation, prospective study subjects who scored above the threshold value for unpleasant breath odor were stratified by score and randomized into two treatment groups. Subjects were provided with a soft-bristled toothbrush and brushed their teeth thoroughly in their regular and customary manner for 1 minute with their assigned dentifrice, twice daily. Before oral-malodor evaluations, the subjects refrained from eating odorigenic foods and did not use dental hygiene procedures, breath mints, or mouth rinses. Eighty-one adult men and women from Chengdu, China, completed the study. Throughout the study, the mean breath-odor scores observed in the Colgate Total Advanced Fresh toothpaste group for both daytime and overnight were within the range of values associated with pleasant breath odor, were statistically significantly lower than the corresponding mean scores for the control group, and also represented statistically significant reductions from baseline. Relative to the baseline score, more than 80% of the subjects in the Colgate Total Advanced Fresh toothpaste group demonstrated a 3.2 or more unit reduction in organoleptic scores at every postbaseline breath-odor evaluation. Thus, the overall results of the double-blind clinical study support the conclusions that Colgate Total Advanced Fresh toothpaste is efficacious for the control of oral malodor for up to 12 hours in the daytime and up to 12 hours overnight.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Compendium of continuing education in dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Compendium of continuing education in dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01105_41.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Compendium of continuing education in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01105_41.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

本研究的目的是比较市售的、经临床验证的美国牙科协会(ADA)认可的含有0.30%三氯生、2%聚乙烯甲醚/马来酸(PVM/MA)共聚物和0.243%氟化钠(10%高清洁度硅基)的牙膏(高露洁Total Advanced Fresh)与市售的、经临床验证的牙膏的有效性。在一项为期3周的随机、双盲纵向临床试验中,ada认可的含有0.243%二氧化硅基氟化钠的对照牙膏(高露洁护腔冬青凝胶)用于治疗口腔异味。一个由四名专家评委组成的小组使用九分制的快乐量表来评估呼吸气味,使用的协议是根据美国口腔异味管理产品的美国ADA接受计划指南草案设计的。在基线评估后,对评分高于令人不快的呼吸气味阈值的前瞻性研究受试者按评分分层并随机分为两个治疗组。受试者使用软毛牙刷,按常规习惯用指定的牙膏彻底刷牙,每次1分钟,每日两次。在口腔异味评估之前,受试者避免食用有异味的食物,不使用口腔卫生程序、薄荷糖或漱口水。来自中国成都的81名成年男女完成了这项研究。在整个研究过程中,高露洁Total Advanced Fresh牙膏组白天和晚上的平均呼吸气味得分都在与宜人的呼吸气味相关的值范围内,在统计上显著低于对照组的相应平均得分,并且在统计上也比基线有显著降低。与基线得分相比,使用高露洁全高级新鲜牙膏组中超过80%的受试者在每次基线后的呼吸气味评估中表现出3.2或更多单位的感官得分降低。因此,这项双盲临床研究的总体结果支持这样的结论:高露洁Total Advanced Fresh牙膏对口腔异味的控制效果在白天可达12小时,在夜间可达12小时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical effectiveness of a triclosan/copolymer/sodium-fluoride dentifrice in controlling oral malodor: a three-week clinical trial.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a commercially available, clinically proven, American Dental Association (ADA)-Accepted dentifrice containing 0.30% triclosan, 2% polyvinylmethylether/maleic acid (PVM/MA) copolymer, and 0.243% sodium fluoride in a 10% high-cleaning silica base (Colgate Total Advanced Fresh) to a commercially available, clinically proven, ADA-Accepted control dentifrice containing 0.243% sodium fluoride in a silica base (Colgate Cavity Protection Winterfresh Gel) for the management of oral malodor in a 3-week, randomized, double-blind longitudinal clinical trial. A panel of four expert judges used a nine-point hedonic scale to evaluate breath odor using a protocol designed in concordance with the ADA Draft Acceptance Program Guidelines for Products Used in the Management of Oral Malodor. After a baseline evaluation, prospective study subjects who scored above the threshold value for unpleasant breath odor were stratified by score and randomized into two treatment groups. Subjects were provided with a soft-bristled toothbrush and brushed their teeth thoroughly in their regular and customary manner for 1 minute with their assigned dentifrice, twice daily. Before oral-malodor evaluations, the subjects refrained from eating odorigenic foods and did not use dental hygiene procedures, breath mints, or mouth rinses. Eighty-one adult men and women from Chengdu, China, completed the study. Throughout the study, the mean breath-odor scores observed in the Colgate Total Advanced Fresh toothpaste group for both daytime and overnight were within the range of values associated with pleasant breath odor, were statistically significantly lower than the corresponding mean scores for the control group, and also represented statistically significant reductions from baseline. Relative to the baseline score, more than 80% of the subjects in the Colgate Total Advanced Fresh toothpaste group demonstrated a 3.2 or more unit reduction in organoleptic scores at every postbaseline breath-odor evaluation. Thus, the overall results of the double-blind clinical study support the conclusions that Colgate Total Advanced Fresh toothpaste is efficacious for the control of oral malodor for up to 12 hours in the daytime and up to 12 hours overnight.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信