学校的质量能大于教师的质量吗?乌干达难民背景下低年级阅读技能的案例

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
M. Fontana, M. Ariapa, Gillian Atuheire
{"title":"学校的质量能大于教师的质量吗?乌干达难民背景下低年级阅读技能的案例","authors":"M. Fontana, M. Ariapa, Gillian Atuheire","doi":"10.13042/bordon.2020.83295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION. As highlighted in the 2018 Uganda Education Response Plan, reading levels in refugee host communities are way below the national average. Since the 2018 National Assessment of Progress in Education report highlighted some challenging areas to the in-service teachers, a possible explanation for the persistent poor performance of learners in reading may reside with the finding that many educators themselves lack an understanding of the linguistic construct. Therefore, an informed training for teachers in primary schools was implemented to help them foster learners’ reading skills. The purpose of this paper is consequently to analyse whether learners whose teachers participated in the evidence-based intervention have better reading skills than those whose teachers did not participate in the intervention. METHOD. To achieve this, a quasi-experimental pre-program/post-program design, involving 2 schools, 24 teachers (12 per school), and 297 learners (157 from treatment and 140 from control) from Palabek (Uganda) refugee settlement was adopted. FINDINGS. The findings show that the reading skills of learners whose teachers participated in the intervention significantly improved as compared to their counterparts. Particularly, learners’ reading skills significantly improved in the areas of letter sound knowledge, segmenting knowledge, and nonword decoding, and slightly in oral passage reading and comprehension, and English vocabulary. DISCUSSION. This study therefore supported the hypothesis linked to the Peter Effect - one cannot be expected to give what they do not possess and raised a need for the Ministry of Education and Sports to mandate sufficient and informed training of teachers.","PeriodicalId":45710,"journal":{"name":"Bordon-Revista de Pedagogia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can the quality of a school be greater than the quality of its teachers? A case of early grade reading skills in Ugandan refugee context\",\"authors\":\"M. Fontana, M. Ariapa, Gillian Atuheire\",\"doi\":\"10.13042/bordon.2020.83295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION. As highlighted in the 2018 Uganda Education Response Plan, reading levels in refugee host communities are way below the national average. Since the 2018 National Assessment of Progress in Education report highlighted some challenging areas to the in-service teachers, a possible explanation for the persistent poor performance of learners in reading may reside with the finding that many educators themselves lack an understanding of the linguistic construct. Therefore, an informed training for teachers in primary schools was implemented to help them foster learners’ reading skills. The purpose of this paper is consequently to analyse whether learners whose teachers participated in the evidence-based intervention have better reading skills than those whose teachers did not participate in the intervention. METHOD. To achieve this, a quasi-experimental pre-program/post-program design, involving 2 schools, 24 teachers (12 per school), and 297 learners (157 from treatment and 140 from control) from Palabek (Uganda) refugee settlement was adopted. FINDINGS. The findings show that the reading skills of learners whose teachers participated in the intervention significantly improved as compared to their counterparts. Particularly, learners’ reading skills significantly improved in the areas of letter sound knowledge, segmenting knowledge, and nonword decoding, and slightly in oral passage reading and comprehension, and English vocabulary. DISCUSSION. This study therefore supported the hypothesis linked to the Peter Effect - one cannot be expected to give what they do not possess and raised a need for the Ministry of Education and Sports to mandate sufficient and informed training of teachers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bordon-Revista de Pedagogia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bordon-Revista de Pedagogia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13042/bordon.2020.83295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bordon-Revista de Pedagogia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13042/bordon.2020.83295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。正如2018年乌干达教育应对计划所强调的那样,难民收容社区的阅读水平远低于全国平均水平。由于《2018年全国教育进展评估报告》强调了在职教师面临的一些挑战领域,学习者在阅读方面持续表现不佳的一个可能解释可能是,许多教育工作者本身缺乏对语言结构的理解。因此,对小学教师进行知情培训,以帮助他们培养学习者的阅读技能。因此,本文的目的是分析教师参与循证干预的学习者是否比教师未参与干预的学习者具有更好的阅读技能。方法。为了实现这一目标,采用了一种准实验性的方案前/方案后设计,涉及2所学校、24名教师(每所学校12名)和297名学习者(157名来自治疗组,140名来自对照组),来自Palabek(乌干达)难民定居点。发现。研究结果表明,教师参与干预的学生的阅读技能显著提高。特别是在字母发音知识、分词知识和非词解码方面,学习者的阅读技能有显著提高,而在口语段落阅读和理解以及英语词汇方面,学习者的阅读技能略有提高。讨论。因此,这项研究支持了与彼得效应有关的假设——不能指望一个人给予他们没有的东西,并提出了教育和体育部要求对教师进行充分和知情培训的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can the quality of a school be greater than the quality of its teachers? A case of early grade reading skills in Ugandan refugee context
INTRODUCTION. As highlighted in the 2018 Uganda Education Response Plan, reading levels in refugee host communities are way below the national average. Since the 2018 National Assessment of Progress in Education report highlighted some challenging areas to the in-service teachers, a possible explanation for the persistent poor performance of learners in reading may reside with the finding that many educators themselves lack an understanding of the linguistic construct. Therefore, an informed training for teachers in primary schools was implemented to help them foster learners’ reading skills. The purpose of this paper is consequently to analyse whether learners whose teachers participated in the evidence-based intervention have better reading skills than those whose teachers did not participate in the intervention. METHOD. To achieve this, a quasi-experimental pre-program/post-program design, involving 2 schools, 24 teachers (12 per school), and 297 learners (157 from treatment and 140 from control) from Palabek (Uganda) refugee settlement was adopted. FINDINGS. The findings show that the reading skills of learners whose teachers participated in the intervention significantly improved as compared to their counterparts. Particularly, learners’ reading skills significantly improved in the areas of letter sound knowledge, segmenting knowledge, and nonword decoding, and slightly in oral passage reading and comprehension, and English vocabulary. DISCUSSION. This study therefore supported the hypothesis linked to the Peter Effect - one cannot be expected to give what they do not possess and raised a need for the Ministry of Education and Sports to mandate sufficient and informed training of teachers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bordon-Revista de Pedagogia
Bordon-Revista de Pedagogia EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Bordon. Journal of Education (ISSN: 0210-5934, e-ISSN: 2340-6577), the publication of the Spanish Pedagogical Society, published continuously since 1949. Originally a monthly publication until 1973, it is now published quarterly. It is a scientific journal in the field of education and gives a humanistic and universal view as an aid for education professionals. The purpose of Bordon is expressed in its presentation article (Issue 1, Year 1, May 1949), highly significant for the cultural moment of the times, and in which it makes this brief statement: “We are attempting to provide a service to education in Spain and even worldwide. As grand as our intention may be, we still believe in simplicity. We are not upset by the risk of failure; if Bordón only becomes of interest in the world of culture and education, we will thank God for helping us hit the mark; if, however, we were to see that we do know how to achieve our goal, we would calmly but perhaps slightly melancholically allow this newborn journal to die. And perhaps in this presence of possible failure may be found the greatest guarantee of continuity, because it will be for us like a permanent call of alert.” Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía is present in all the major indices of scientific quality such as the European Reference Index for the Humanities Proquest, Ebsco… Two external reviewers evaluate all its articles, in accordance with the double-blind peer review system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信