计算转向后的语篇分析:好坏参半

IF 1.2 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Donald Matheson
{"title":"计算转向后的语篇分析:好坏参半","authors":"Donald Matheson","doi":"10.1080/22041451.2023.2190531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper seeks to clarify a methodological agenda for combining discourse analysis with corpus analysis. It details four concerns. Firstly, it argues that corpus-assisted discourse analysis can quite drastically narrow the view on discourse, if used on its own and without accompanying theoretical tools for exploring social practice. Secondly, corpora are of more value in helping researchers identify the symbolic resources that people have available to them than at understanding how they use those resources. Thirdly, they must be approached through a renewed appreciation of communication as a human accomplishment and corpora must, therefore, be reconnected to the producers of that discourse. And fourthly, corpora are of greater value when extended beyond lexical analysis. Underpinning these points is a commitment to discourse analysis as a tool to understand in close detail how people use language to do things in their lives.","PeriodicalId":10644,"journal":{"name":"Communication Research and Practice","volume":"3 1","pages":"3 - 15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discourse analysis after the computational turn: a mixed bag\",\"authors\":\"Donald Matheson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/22041451.2023.2190531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper seeks to clarify a methodological agenda for combining discourse analysis with corpus analysis. It details four concerns. Firstly, it argues that corpus-assisted discourse analysis can quite drastically narrow the view on discourse, if used on its own and without accompanying theoretical tools for exploring social practice. Secondly, corpora are of more value in helping researchers identify the symbolic resources that people have available to them than at understanding how they use those resources. Thirdly, they must be approached through a renewed appreciation of communication as a human accomplishment and corpora must, therefore, be reconnected to the producers of that discourse. And fourthly, corpora are of greater value when extended beyond lexical analysis. Underpinning these points is a commitment to discourse analysis as a tool to understand in close detail how people use language to do things in their lives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"3 - 15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2023.2190531\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2023.2190531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文旨在阐明语篇分析与语料库分析相结合的方法论议程。它详细说明了四个问题。首先,它认为语料库辅助语篇分析如果单独使用,而没有伴随的理论工具来探索社会实践,可以大大缩小对语篇的看法。其次,语料库在帮助研究人员识别人们可用的符号资源方面比理解他们如何使用这些资源更有价值。第三,必须重新认识到交流是人类的一项成就,因此语料库必须与这种话语的生产者重新联系起来。第四,语料库在词法分析之外具有更大的价值。支撑这些观点的是对话语分析的承诺,这是一种详细了解人们在生活中如何使用语言做事的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discourse analysis after the computational turn: a mixed bag
ABSTRACT This paper seeks to clarify a methodological agenda for combining discourse analysis with corpus analysis. It details four concerns. Firstly, it argues that corpus-assisted discourse analysis can quite drastically narrow the view on discourse, if used on its own and without accompanying theoretical tools for exploring social practice. Secondly, corpora are of more value in helping researchers identify the symbolic resources that people have available to them than at understanding how they use those resources. Thirdly, they must be approached through a renewed appreciation of communication as a human accomplishment and corpora must, therefore, be reconnected to the producers of that discourse. And fourthly, corpora are of greater value when extended beyond lexical analysis. Underpinning these points is a commitment to discourse analysis as a tool to understand in close detail how people use language to do things in their lives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信