既有钢铁道桥梁目标可靠度水平对部分因素的影响

V. Nadolski, M. Holicky, M. Sýkora
{"title":"既有钢铁道桥梁目标可靠度水平对部分因素的影响","authors":"V. Nadolski, M. Holicky, M. Sýkora","doi":"10.4028/p-0yrf72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many existing steel railway bridges, often recognized and protected for their heritage value, are exposed to degradation and increasing traffic loads and their reliability needs to be assessed. The key question is whether a particular bridge can be preserved, or needs to be strengthened or replaced. The main aspect in decision-making is specification of the target reliability. Development and wider use of the adjusted partial factor method seem to be reasonable to find the balance between demands on the input information, computational complexity, and improvements in reliability assessment. Adjusted partial factors are based on the relevant statistical parameters for basic variables and a selected target reliability index. In this contribution, the effect of the target reliability on updated partial factors are demonstrated. The case study illustrates that the target reliability levels recommended in various documents for new and existing structures are inconsistent in terms of the values and criteria according to which these values are to be selected. Consequently, the values of the partial factors for assessment may be significantly dissimilar.","PeriodicalId":10603,"journal":{"name":"Construction Technologies and Architecture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Target Reliability Level on Partial Factors for Existing Steel Railway Bridges\",\"authors\":\"V. Nadolski, M. Holicky, M. Sýkora\",\"doi\":\"10.4028/p-0yrf72\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many existing steel railway bridges, often recognized and protected for their heritage value, are exposed to degradation and increasing traffic loads and their reliability needs to be assessed. The key question is whether a particular bridge can be preserved, or needs to be strengthened or replaced. The main aspect in decision-making is specification of the target reliability. Development and wider use of the adjusted partial factor method seem to be reasonable to find the balance between demands on the input information, computational complexity, and improvements in reliability assessment. Adjusted partial factors are based on the relevant statistical parameters for basic variables and a selected target reliability index. In this contribution, the effect of the target reliability on updated partial factors are demonstrated. The case study illustrates that the target reliability levels recommended in various documents for new and existing structures are inconsistent in terms of the values and criteria according to which these values are to be selected. Consequently, the values of the partial factors for assessment may be significantly dissimilar.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Construction Technologies and Architecture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Construction Technologies and Architecture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4028/p-0yrf72\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction Technologies and Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4028/p-0yrf72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

许多现有的钢铁路桥往往因其遗产价值而得到认可和保护,但它们面临着退化和日益增加的交通负荷,需要对其可靠性进行评估。关键的问题是一座特定的桥梁是否可以被保留,或者需要加强或更换。决策的主要方面是确定目标的可靠性。调整部分因子法的发展和广泛应用似乎是合理的,可以在输入信息的需求、计算复杂性和可靠性评估的改进之间找到平衡。调整后的部分因子基于基本变量的相关统计参数和选定的目标可靠性指标。在这篇贡献中,证明了目标可靠性对更新的部分因子的影响。案例研究表明,各种文件中推荐的新结构和现有结构的目标可靠度水平在选择这些值的值和标准方面是不一致的。因此,评估的部分因素的值可能是显著不同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Target Reliability Level on Partial Factors for Existing Steel Railway Bridges
Many existing steel railway bridges, often recognized and protected for their heritage value, are exposed to degradation and increasing traffic loads and their reliability needs to be assessed. The key question is whether a particular bridge can be preserved, or needs to be strengthened or replaced. The main aspect in decision-making is specification of the target reliability. Development and wider use of the adjusted partial factor method seem to be reasonable to find the balance between demands on the input information, computational complexity, and improvements in reliability assessment. Adjusted partial factors are based on the relevant statistical parameters for basic variables and a selected target reliability index. In this contribution, the effect of the target reliability on updated partial factors are demonstrated. The case study illustrates that the target reliability levels recommended in various documents for new and existing structures are inconsistent in terms of the values and criteria according to which these values are to be selected. Consequently, the values of the partial factors for assessment may be significantly dissimilar.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信