Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Henn Korjus, Mihkel Mets, Ahto Kangur
{"title":"Harvendusraietel toimunud metsaõigusnormide rikkumise juhtumite hindamine","authors":"Henn Korjus, Mihkel Mets, Ahto Kangur","doi":"10.2478/fsmu-2020-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Three cases of violation of forest management regulations in Estonia in 2004, 2005 and 2007 are presented in the study where the required lower limit of basal area after thinnings was not followed. These stands were revisited in 2017 to assess the impacts of such thinnings. The actual thinnings were well justified from the silvicultural and economic viewpoints. All three stands were ecologically in good condition in 2017. Also, all three stands had already reached the required age or dimensions allowing regeneration cutting in 2017. Forest management regulations on thinning did not work well in the studied cases and therefore some changes in the current regulations are necessary in Estonia.","PeriodicalId":35353,"journal":{"name":"Forestry Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forestry Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/fsmu-2020-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文介绍了2004年、2005年和2007年爱沙尼亚发生的三起违反森林管理法规的案例,未达到规定的疏林后基底面积下限。2017年,为了评估这种变薄的影响,对这些看台进行了重新审视。从森林文化和经济的角度来看,实际的减少是合理的。2017年,这三个看台的生态状况都很好。此外,所有三个支架都已经达到了要求的年龄或尺寸,可以在2017年进行再生切割。在所研究的案例中,关于伐林的森林管理条例没有很好地发挥作用,因此爱沙尼亚有必要对现行条例进行一些修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Harvendusraietel toimunud metsaõigusnormide rikkumise juhtumite hindamine
Abstract Three cases of violation of forest management regulations in Estonia in 2004, 2005 and 2007 are presented in the study where the required lower limit of basal area after thinnings was not followed. These stands were revisited in 2017 to assess the impacts of such thinnings. The actual thinnings were well justified from the silvicultural and economic viewpoints. All three stands were ecologically in good condition in 2017. Also, all three stands had already reached the required age or dimensions allowing regeneration cutting in 2017. Forest management regulations on thinning did not work well in the studied cases and therefore some changes in the current regulations are necessary in Estonia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forestry Studies
Forestry Studies Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信