厄瓜多尔“模拟”林业的碳封存潜力:退化牧场重新造林的替代战略

IF 3 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Forestry Pub Date : 2020-06-24 DOI:10.1093/forestry/cpaa017
Raúl Armando Ramos Veintimilla, D. MacFarlane, Lauren Cooper
{"title":"厄瓜多尔“模拟”林业的碳封存潜力:退化牧场重新造林的替代战略","authors":"Raúl Armando Ramos Veintimilla, D. MacFarlane, Lauren Cooper","doi":"10.1093/forestry/cpaa017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n ‘Analog’ forestry is a novel silvicultural approach for reforestation of degraded land that seeks to establish trees that are analogous in structure and ecological function to the original climax or subclimax vegetation of the region where they are planted. Analog forestry aims to strengthen rural communities, both socially and economically, with tree plantings of high biodiversity, which provide commercial products and resiliency, while avoiding agrochemicals and fossil fuels. The latter links this strategy to climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies, but there has been little analysis comparing the potential for above- and below-ground carbon storage in analog forests, as compared with more typical reforestation efforts via single-species plantations. We present the results of a study to estimate carbon sequestration levels, above- and below-ground, from an experimental analog forest system and a teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) plantation system, in comparison with a degraded pasture system. The study found that the analog and teak plantation forest systems stored higher quantities of total carbon (178 and 141 t C ha−1, respectively), when compared with a degraded pasture system (124 t C ha−1). However, the teak plantation had decreased soil carbon stocks, relative to the degraded pasture. The analog forest had the best balance of both above- and below-ground carbon stored over the 17-year study period and provided a more diverse array of timber and non-timber forest products when compared with the teak plantation. This suggests that analog forestry could be a viable social–ecological approach to carbon storage and reforestation in the study region and other places with large areas of degraded pasture and a good understanding of the structure and function of the original vegetation.","PeriodicalId":12342,"journal":{"name":"Forestry","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The carbon sequestration potential of ‘analog’ forestry in Ecuador: an alternative strategy for reforestation of degraded pastures\",\"authors\":\"Raúl Armando Ramos Veintimilla, D. MacFarlane, Lauren Cooper\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/forestry/cpaa017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n ‘Analog’ forestry is a novel silvicultural approach for reforestation of degraded land that seeks to establish trees that are analogous in structure and ecological function to the original climax or subclimax vegetation of the region where they are planted. Analog forestry aims to strengthen rural communities, both socially and economically, with tree plantings of high biodiversity, which provide commercial products and resiliency, while avoiding agrochemicals and fossil fuels. The latter links this strategy to climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies, but there has been little analysis comparing the potential for above- and below-ground carbon storage in analog forests, as compared with more typical reforestation efforts via single-species plantations. We present the results of a study to estimate carbon sequestration levels, above- and below-ground, from an experimental analog forest system and a teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) plantation system, in comparison with a degraded pasture system. The study found that the analog and teak plantation forest systems stored higher quantities of total carbon (178 and 141 t C ha−1, respectively), when compared with a degraded pasture system (124 t C ha−1). However, the teak plantation had decreased soil carbon stocks, relative to the degraded pasture. The analog forest had the best balance of both above- and below-ground carbon stored over the 17-year study period and provided a more diverse array of timber and non-timber forest products when compared with the teak plantation. This suggests that analog forestry could be a viable social–ecological approach to carbon storage and reforestation in the study region and other places with large areas of degraded pasture and a good understanding of the structure and function of the original vegetation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forestry\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forestry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpaa017\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpaa017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

“模拟”林业是一种新的造林方法,用于退化土地的再造林,旨在建立在结构和生态功能上类似于原始顶极或次顶极植被的树木。模拟林业旨在通过种植高生物多样性的树木,在社会和经济上加强农村社区,提供商业产品和弹性,同时避免使用农用化学品和化石燃料。后者将这一战略与气候变化减缓和适应战略联系起来,但是很少有分析将模拟森林的地上和地下碳储存潜力与通过单一物种种植园进行的更典型的再造林工作进行比较。我们提出了一项研究的结果,以估计从实验模拟森林系统和柚木(Tectona grandis L.f.)人工林系统的地上和地下碳固存水平,并将其与退化的牧场系统进行比较。研究发现,与退化的牧场系统(124 t C ha - 1)相比,模拟和柚木人工林系统储存的总碳量更高(分别为178和141 t C ha - 1)。与退化草地相比,柚木人工林土壤碳储量明显减少。与柚木人工林相比,模拟森林在17年的研究期间具有最佳的地上和地下碳储量平衡,并提供更多样化的木材和非木材林产品。这表明,在研究区和其他有大面积退化牧场和对原始植被的结构和功能有很好的了解的地方,模拟林业可能是一种可行的社会生态碳储存和再造林方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The carbon sequestration potential of ‘analog’ forestry in Ecuador: an alternative strategy for reforestation of degraded pastures
‘Analog’ forestry is a novel silvicultural approach for reforestation of degraded land that seeks to establish trees that are analogous in structure and ecological function to the original climax or subclimax vegetation of the region where they are planted. Analog forestry aims to strengthen rural communities, both socially and economically, with tree plantings of high biodiversity, which provide commercial products and resiliency, while avoiding agrochemicals and fossil fuels. The latter links this strategy to climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies, but there has been little analysis comparing the potential for above- and below-ground carbon storage in analog forests, as compared with more typical reforestation efforts via single-species plantations. We present the results of a study to estimate carbon sequestration levels, above- and below-ground, from an experimental analog forest system and a teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) plantation system, in comparison with a degraded pasture system. The study found that the analog and teak plantation forest systems stored higher quantities of total carbon (178 and 141 t C ha−1, respectively), when compared with a degraded pasture system (124 t C ha−1). However, the teak plantation had decreased soil carbon stocks, relative to the degraded pasture. The analog forest had the best balance of both above- and below-ground carbon stored over the 17-year study period and provided a more diverse array of timber and non-timber forest products when compared with the teak plantation. This suggests that analog forestry could be a viable social–ecological approach to carbon storage and reforestation in the study region and other places with large areas of degraded pasture and a good understanding of the structure and function of the original vegetation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forestry
Forestry 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
47
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is inclusive of all subjects, geographical zones and study locations, including trees in urban environments, plantations and natural forests. We welcome papers that consider economic, environmental and social factors and, in particular, studies that take an integrated approach to sustainable management. In considering suitability for publication, attention is given to the originality of contributions and their likely impact on policy and practice, as well as their contribution to the development of knowledge. Special Issues - each year one edition of Forestry will be a Special Issue and will focus on one subject in detail; this will usually be by publication of the proceedings of an international meeting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信