关于神，我们能知道什么?约翰·布里丹和英亨的马西利乌斯论知识分子认识上帝本质的自然能力

IF 0.3 2区哲学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES

Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales Pub Date : 2010-06-30 DOI:10.2143/RTPM.77.1.2050375

F. J. Kok

{"title":"关于神，我们能知道什么?约翰·布里丹和英亨的马西利乌斯论知识分子认识上帝本质的自然能力","authors":"F. J. Kok","doi":"10.2143/RTPM.77.1.2050375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent investigations into the relationship between the questions on the Metaphysics authored by Marsilius of Inghen, on the one hand, and John Buridan, on the other, have revealed interesting doctrinal contrasts between them. The present article extends these investigations by examining the metaphysical question of whether we have a natural capacity for knowing God. Even though Marsilius followed Buridan's reasoning to a great extent, he disagreed with his main point: that our intellect has the natural capacity for abstracting an absolute, simple, essential concept of God from his effects. The disagreement is rooted in their differing conceptions of what an absolute concept of God entails, viz. Buridan's strictly philosophical conception vis-a-vis Marsilius' more theological conception.","PeriodicalId":41176,"journal":{"name":"Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Can we Know About God? John Buridan and Marsilius of Inghen on the Intellect's Natural Capacity for Knowing God's Essence\",\"authors\":\"F. J. Kok\",\"doi\":\"10.2143/RTPM.77.1.2050375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent investigations into the relationship between the questions on the Metaphysics authored by Marsilius of Inghen, on the one hand, and John Buridan, on the other, have revealed interesting doctrinal contrasts between them. The present article extends these investigations by examining the metaphysical question of whether we have a natural capacity for knowing God. Even though Marsilius followed Buridan's reasoning to a great extent, he disagreed with his main point: that our intellect has the natural capacity for abstracting an absolute, simple, essential concept of God from his effects. The disagreement is rooted in their differing conceptions of what an absolute concept of God entails, viz. Buridan's strictly philosophical conception vis-a-vis Marsilius' more theological conception.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2143/RTPM.77.1.2050375\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/RTPM.77.1.2050375","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

最近对马西利乌斯和布里丹的《形而上学》问题之间关系的研究，揭示了他们之间有趣的理论对比。本文通过考察我们是否有认识上帝的自然能力的形而上学问题来扩展这些调查。尽管马西利乌斯在很大程度上遵循了布里丹的推理，但他不同意布里丹的主要观点:我们的智力具有从上帝的影响中抽象出绝对、简单、基本概念的自然能力。分歧的根源在于他们对上帝的绝对概念所包含的不同概念，即布里丹的严格哲学概念与马西利乌斯的更神学的概念。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

What Can we Know About God? John Buridan and Marsilius of Inghen on the Intellect's Natural Capacity for Knowing God's Essence

Recent investigations into the relationship between the questions on the Metaphysics authored by Marsilius of Inghen, on the one hand, and John Buridan, on the other, have revealed interesting doctrinal contrasts between them. The present article extends these investigations by examining the metaphysical question of whether we have a natural capacity for knowing God. Even though Marsilius followed Buridan's reasoning to a great extent, he disagreed with his main point: that our intellect has the natural capacity for abstracting an absolute, simple, essential concept of God from his effects. The disagreement is rooted in their differing conceptions of what an absolute concept of God entails, viz. Buridan's strictly philosophical conception vis-a-vis Marsilius' more theological conception.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Recherches de Theologie et Philosophie Medievales Multiple-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales / Forschungen zur Theologie und Philosophie des Mittelalters (formerly Recherches de Théologie Ancienne et Médiévale of the Abbaye Mont César) provides a forum for original, high-quality research on all aspects of theology and philosophy from Augustine and the Early Middle Ages up to late scholasticism. Recent articles have included highly focused studies on particular facets of the medieval philosophical or theological tradition, broader reconsiderations of received views in the history of medieval theology and philosophy, and editions of texts and manuscript studies.