本科生研究训练计划的影响:寻找比较组并评估学术和研究生院成果的说明性例子。

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kaitlyn N Stormes, Nicole A Streicker, Graham K Bowers, Perla Ayala, Guido G Urizar
{"title":"本科生研究训练计划的影响:寻找比较组并评估学术和研究生院成果的说明性例子。","authors":"Kaitlyn N Stormes,&nbsp;Nicole A Streicker,&nbsp;Graham K Bowers,&nbsp;Perla Ayala,&nbsp;Guido G Urizar","doi":"10.18833/spur/5/3/8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, researchers at a large, urban, comprehensive minority-serving institution used propensity score matching to identify a unique comparison group to study academic and graduate school outcomes in students served by the National Institutes of Health-funded Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (BUILD) Initiative. Acknowledging that students' self-selection biases may confound findings, the use of propensity methods to match students served with those who were not (but were otherwise eligible) provides a valuable tool for evaluators and practitioners to combat this challenge and better evaluate their effectiveness and impact on students' success. This study's findings indicate that BUILD participants had higher academic and graduate school success with regard to cumulative GPA, units attempted and completed, graduation status, and application and admission to graduate programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":29737,"journal":{"name":"SPUR-Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10002406/pdf/nihms-1874501.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Undergraduate Research Training Programs: An Illustrative Example of Finding a Comparison Group and Evaluating Academic and Graduate School Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Kaitlyn N Stormes,&nbsp;Nicole A Streicker,&nbsp;Graham K Bowers,&nbsp;Perla Ayala,&nbsp;Guido G Urizar\",\"doi\":\"10.18833/spur/5/3/8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this study, researchers at a large, urban, comprehensive minority-serving institution used propensity score matching to identify a unique comparison group to study academic and graduate school outcomes in students served by the National Institutes of Health-funded Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (BUILD) Initiative. Acknowledging that students' self-selection biases may confound findings, the use of propensity methods to match students served with those who were not (but were otherwise eligible) provides a valuable tool for evaluators and practitioners to combat this challenge and better evaluate their effectiveness and impact on students' success. This study's findings indicate that BUILD participants had higher academic and graduate school success with regard to cumulative GPA, units attempted and completed, graduation status, and application and admission to graduate programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SPUR-Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10002406/pdf/nihms-1874501.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SPUR-Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18833/spur/5/3/8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPUR-Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18833/spur/5/3/8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,研究人员在一个大型的、城市的、综合性的少数民族服务机构使用倾向得分匹配来确定一个独特的对照组,以研究由美国国立卫生研究院资助的建筑基础设施导致多样性(BUILD)倡议服务的学生的学术和研究生学业成果。承认学生的自我选择偏差可能会混淆研究结果,使用倾向方法将学生与那些没有(但其他方面符合条件)的学生进行匹配,为评估者和从业者提供了一个有价值的工具,可以应对这一挑战,更好地评估他们的有效性和对学生成功的影响。本研究的结果表明,BUILD参与者在累积GPA、尝试和完成的单元、毕业状态、申请和录取研究生课程方面取得了更高的学术和研究生院的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Undergraduate Research Training Programs: An Illustrative Example of Finding a Comparison Group and Evaluating Academic and Graduate School Outcomes.

In this study, researchers at a large, urban, comprehensive minority-serving institution used propensity score matching to identify a unique comparison group to study academic and graduate school outcomes in students served by the National Institutes of Health-funded Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (BUILD) Initiative. Acknowledging that students' self-selection biases may confound findings, the use of propensity methods to match students served with those who were not (but were otherwise eligible) provides a valuable tool for evaluators and practitioners to combat this challenge and better evaluate their effectiveness and impact on students' success. This study's findings indicate that BUILD participants had higher academic and graduate school success with regard to cumulative GPA, units attempted and completed, graduation status, and application and admission to graduate programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信