用Neolix和XP shaper旋转锉根管预备后粪肠球菌体外计数的减少

Q3 Dentistry
Mina Mehrjouei, Somaye Teimoori, M. Mirmohammadkhani, Seyed Mortazavi, Maryam Khorasanchi
{"title":"用Neolix和XP shaper旋转锉根管预备后粪肠球菌体外计数的减少","authors":"Mina Mehrjouei, Somaye Teimoori, M. Mirmohammadkhani, Seyed Mortazavi, Maryam Khorasanchi","doi":"10.4103/sej.sej_9_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The main goal of root canal treatment is to decrease the count of intracanal microorganisms and their byproducts. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of Neolix and XP Shaper rotary files for the reduction of Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) count in the root canal system. Materials and Methods: This in vitro, experimental study evaluated 58 single-rooted single-canal teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into two experimental groups (n = 25) for root canal instrumentation with Neolix and XP Shaper files and positive and negative control groups (n = 4). All teeth were primarily instrumented with #20 K-file and #2 and #3 Gates-Glidden drills. The smear layer was removed using 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. The teeth were then autoclave sterilized and the root canals in all groups, except for the negative control, were inoculated with E. faecalis. All teeth were then CO2 incubated for 24 h. Primary samples were collected. Next, the root canals in Group 1 were instrumented with Neolix, while the root canals in Group 2 were instrumented with XP Shaper. Root canals in the positive control group were only rinsed with saline. Secondary samples were collected after instrumentation. The number of colonies formed on the blood-agar was counted before and after instrumentation. Results: The negative control group showed no bacterial growth. The positive control group showed a 14.11% reduction in bacterial count. The mean percentage of reduction in bacterial colony count was 92.92% and 87.79% in the Neolix and XP Shaper groups, respectively. The difference in this regard was significant between the two experimental groups with different apical sizes (Mann–Whitney test, P = 0.02). Conclusion: Both files caused a significant reduction in E. faecalis count. However, Neolix had a superior efficacy for canal cleaning compared with XP Shaper.","PeriodicalId":21485,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Endodontic Journal","volume":"39 1","pages":"236 - 241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro reduction in Enterococcus faecalis count following root canal preparation with Neolix and XP shaper rotary files\",\"authors\":\"Mina Mehrjouei, Somaye Teimoori, M. Mirmohammadkhani, Seyed Mortazavi, Maryam Khorasanchi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/sej.sej_9_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The main goal of root canal treatment is to decrease the count of intracanal microorganisms and their byproducts. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of Neolix and XP Shaper rotary files for the reduction of Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) count in the root canal system. Materials and Methods: This in vitro, experimental study evaluated 58 single-rooted single-canal teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into two experimental groups (n = 25) for root canal instrumentation with Neolix and XP Shaper files and positive and negative control groups (n = 4). All teeth were primarily instrumented with #20 K-file and #2 and #3 Gates-Glidden drills. The smear layer was removed using 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. The teeth were then autoclave sterilized and the root canals in all groups, except for the negative control, were inoculated with E. faecalis. All teeth were then CO2 incubated for 24 h. Primary samples were collected. Next, the root canals in Group 1 were instrumented with Neolix, while the root canals in Group 2 were instrumented with XP Shaper. Root canals in the positive control group were only rinsed with saline. Secondary samples were collected after instrumentation. The number of colonies formed on the blood-agar was counted before and after instrumentation. Results: The negative control group showed no bacterial growth. The positive control group showed a 14.11% reduction in bacterial count. The mean percentage of reduction in bacterial colony count was 92.92% and 87.79% in the Neolix and XP Shaper groups, respectively. The difference in this regard was significant between the two experimental groups with different apical sizes (Mann–Whitney test, P = 0.02). Conclusion: Both files caused a significant reduction in E. faecalis count. However, Neolix had a superior efficacy for canal cleaning compared with XP Shaper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Endodontic Journal\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"236 - 241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Endodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_9_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_9_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根管治疗的主要目的是减少根管内微生物及其副产物的数量。本研究旨在评估Neolix和XP Shaper旋转锉对根管系统中粪肠球菌(E. faecalis)计数的减少效果。材料与方法:对58颗单根单管牙进行体外实验研究。随机分为Neolix和XP Shaper锉根管预备实验组(n = 25)和阳性对照组和阴性对照组(n = 4)。所有牙齿主要采用20 k锉和2、3号Gates-Glidden钻头进行根管预备。用17%乙二胺四乙酸和5.25%次氯酸钠去除涂抹层。除阴性对照组外,其余各组的牙根管均接种粪肠杆菌。然后将所有牙齿CO2孵育24小时。收集初级样品。接下来,第1组根管使用Neolix根管,第2组根管使用XP Shaper根管。阳性对照组仅用生理盐水冲洗根管。仪器后采集二次样品。测定仪器前后血琼脂上形成的菌落数。结果:阴性对照组无细菌生长。阳性对照组细菌数量减少14.11%。Neolix组和XP Shaper组细菌菌落数量平均减少率分别为92.92%和87.79%。不同根尖大小的两个实验组在这方面的差异有统计学意义(Mann-Whitney检验,P = 0.02)。结论:两份文件均可显著降低粪肠球菌计数。然而,与XP Shaper相比,Neolix对牙根管的清洁效果更佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In vitro reduction in Enterococcus faecalis count following root canal preparation with Neolix and XP shaper rotary files
Introduction: The main goal of root canal treatment is to decrease the count of intracanal microorganisms and their byproducts. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of Neolix and XP Shaper rotary files for the reduction of Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) count in the root canal system. Materials and Methods: This in vitro, experimental study evaluated 58 single-rooted single-canal teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into two experimental groups (n = 25) for root canal instrumentation with Neolix and XP Shaper files and positive and negative control groups (n = 4). All teeth were primarily instrumented with #20 K-file and #2 and #3 Gates-Glidden drills. The smear layer was removed using 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. The teeth were then autoclave sterilized and the root canals in all groups, except for the negative control, were inoculated with E. faecalis. All teeth were then CO2 incubated for 24 h. Primary samples were collected. Next, the root canals in Group 1 were instrumented with Neolix, while the root canals in Group 2 were instrumented with XP Shaper. Root canals in the positive control group were only rinsed with saline. Secondary samples were collected after instrumentation. The number of colonies formed on the blood-agar was counted before and after instrumentation. Results: The negative control group showed no bacterial growth. The positive control group showed a 14.11% reduction in bacterial count. The mean percentage of reduction in bacterial colony count was 92.92% and 87.79% in the Neolix and XP Shaper groups, respectively. The difference in this regard was significant between the two experimental groups with different apical sizes (Mann–Whitney test, P = 0.02). Conclusion: Both files caused a significant reduction in E. faecalis count. However, Neolix had a superior efficacy for canal cleaning compared with XP Shaper.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Endodontic Journal
Saudi Endodontic Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Vision SEJ aims to be one of the foremost worldwide periodical on Endodontics, dedicated to the promotion of research, post-graduate training and further education in Endodontics. Mission Statement To serve as a medium for continued Endodontic education and qualitative scientific publications on clinical trials, basic science related to the biological aspects of Endodontics, basic science related to Endodontic techniques as well as dental trauma that will ultimately improve the Endodontic research and patient’s health. Scope In this journal, Endodontists, Endodontic postgraduate students and general dentists, can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation that help them keep pace with rapid changes in this field. Aims and Objectives To publish cut edge peer-review original articles, case reports, letters to the editor, editorials, review articles, commentaries, and innovations that will impact on Endodontics. To enhance exchange of ideas/information relating to Endodontics and interaction among stakeholders. To encourage networking and partnership between individuals, government and non-governmental organizations for the provision of quality health care. To advocate for training, workshops, seminars, scientific manuscript writing conferences that will advance publishing culture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信