界定核心警察任务:对象征维度的忽视?∗

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Neil Walker
{"title":"界定核心警察任务:对象征维度的忽视?∗","authors":"Neil Walker","doi":"10.1080/10439463.1996.9964740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taking the recent British Home Office Review of Police Core and Ancillary Tasks as its point of departure, the article addresses the failure of official perspectives on policing to address adequately the wider symbolic significance of police institutions and practices. The different ways in which policing can influence wider cultural understandings within both security discourses and non‐security discourses are analysed. In the light of these insights, the recent emergence of a set of contested interpretations of the link between policing and general societal security is investigated and its long‐term implications considered, and the contribution of the Home Office Review to this trend is assessed.","PeriodicalId":47763,"journal":{"name":"Policing & Society","volume":"147 1","pages":"53-71"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining core police tasks: The neglect of the symbolic dimension?∗\",\"authors\":\"Neil Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10439463.1996.9964740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Taking the recent British Home Office Review of Police Core and Ancillary Tasks as its point of departure, the article addresses the failure of official perspectives on policing to address adequately the wider symbolic significance of police institutions and practices. The different ways in which policing can influence wider cultural understandings within both security discourses and non‐security discourses are analysed. In the light of these insights, the recent emergence of a set of contested interpretations of the link between policing and general societal security is investigated and its long‐term implications considered, and the contribution of the Home Office Review to this trend is assessed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policing & Society\",\"volume\":\"147 1\",\"pages\":\"53-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policing & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.1996.9964740\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.1996.9964740","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

本文以最近英国内政部对警察核心和辅助任务的审查为出发点,论述了官方对警务的看法未能充分解决警察机构和实践的更广泛的象征意义。本文分析了警务在安全话语和非安全话语中影响更广泛的文化理解的不同方式。根据这些见解,本文调查了最近出现的一系列关于警务与一般社会安全之间联系的有争议的解释,并考虑了其长期影响,并评估了内政部评论对这一趋势的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Defining core police tasks: The neglect of the symbolic dimension?∗
Taking the recent British Home Office Review of Police Core and Ancillary Tasks as its point of departure, the article addresses the failure of official perspectives on policing to address adequately the wider symbolic significance of police institutions and practices. The different ways in which policing can influence wider cultural understandings within both security discourses and non‐security discourses are analysed. In the light of these insights, the recent emergence of a set of contested interpretations of the link between policing and general societal security is investigated and its long‐term implications considered, and the contribution of the Home Office Review to this trend is assessed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Policing & Society
Policing & Society CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Policing & Society is widely acknowledged as the leading international academic journal specialising in the study of policing institutions and their practices. It is concerned with all aspects of how policing articulates and animates the social contexts in which it is located. This includes: • Social scientific investigations of police policy and activity • Legal and political analyses of police powers and governance • Management oriented research on aspects of police organisation Space is also devoted to the relationship between what the police do and the policing decisions and functions of communities, private sector organisations and other state agencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信