时间合作社交网络上的关系强度动态

Michele A. Brandão, Pedro O. S. Vaz de Melo, Mirella M. Moro
{"title":"时间合作社交网络上的关系强度动态","authors":"Michele A. Brandão, Pedro O. S. Vaz de Melo, Mirella M. Moro","doi":"10.1145/3106426.3106536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In co-authorship social networks, nodes are authors linked by co-authorship interactions. As time is a relevant aspect of such interactions, concepts and metrics designed to static networks have to be adapted to temporal networks. Tie strength is one of those concepts. Here, we verify if current tie strength definitions are valid for temporal networks by analyzing the strength of ties dynamism over temporal co-authorship networks. Surprisingly, our results show that most ties, even the strong ones, tend to perish over time. Thus, most co-authorships are symbiotic without positive concerns. Also, real co-authorship social networks from different research areas have more weak and random ties than strong and bridge ties.","PeriodicalId":20685,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics","volume":"124 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tie strength dynamics over temporal co-authorship social networks\",\"authors\":\"Michele A. Brandão, Pedro O. S. Vaz de Melo, Mirella M. Moro\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3106426.3106536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In co-authorship social networks, nodes are authors linked by co-authorship interactions. As time is a relevant aspect of such interactions, concepts and metrics designed to static networks have to be adapted to temporal networks. Tie strength is one of those concepts. Here, we verify if current tie strength definitions are valid for temporal networks by analyzing the strength of ties dynamism over temporal co-authorship networks. Surprisingly, our results show that most ties, even the strong ones, tend to perish over time. Thus, most co-authorships are symbiotic without positive concerns. Also, real co-authorship social networks from different research areas have more weak and random ties than strong and bridge ties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3106426.3106536\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3106426.3106536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

在合著社交网络中,节点是通过合著互动联系起来的作者。由于时间是这种相互作用的一个相关方面,为静态网络设计的概念和度量必须适应于时间网络。绑扎强度就是其中一个概念。在这里,我们通过分析时间共同作者网络上的联系动态强度来验证当前的联系强度定义是否对时间网络有效。令人惊讶的是,我们的结果表明,大多数关系,即使是牢固的关系,也会随着时间的推移而消失。因此,大多数合作作者都是共生的,没有积极的考虑。此外,来自不同研究领域的真正的合作社交网络有更多的弱和随机联系,而不是强和桥梁联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tie strength dynamics over temporal co-authorship social networks
In co-authorship social networks, nodes are authors linked by co-authorship interactions. As time is a relevant aspect of such interactions, concepts and metrics designed to static networks have to be adapted to temporal networks. Tie strength is one of those concepts. Here, we verify if current tie strength definitions are valid for temporal networks by analyzing the strength of ties dynamism over temporal co-authorship networks. Surprisingly, our results show that most ties, even the strong ones, tend to perish over time. Thus, most co-authorships are symbiotic without positive concerns. Also, real co-authorship social networks from different research areas have more weak and random ties than strong and bridge ties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信