非甾体抗炎药和质子泵抑制剂对粪肠球菌抗菌效果的比较评价:一项体外研究。

Q2 Dentistry
Journal of Conservative Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-08 DOI:10.4103/jcd.jcd_419_22
Akansha Tilokani, Pratik Agrawal, Prasanti Kumari Pradhan, Gaurav Patri, Nilormi Karmakar, Yash Sinha
{"title":"非甾体抗炎药和质子泵抑制剂对粪肠球菌抗菌效果的比较评价:一项体外研究。","authors":"Akansha Tilokani,&nbsp;Pratik Agrawal,&nbsp;Prasanti Kumari Pradhan,&nbsp;Gaurav Patri,&nbsp;Nilormi Karmakar,&nbsp;Yash Sinha","doi":"10.4103/jcd.jcd_419_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The present <i>in vitro</i> experimental study was undertaken to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial activity of triple antibiotic paste (TAP), diclofenac, and proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) against the microorganism Enterococcus faecalis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Three medicaments were selected for the study, TAP, diclofenac, and PPI. The experimental groups for the test were as follows: Part 1 - Group 1: TAP, Group 2: diclofenac, and Group 3: PPI; Part 2 - Group 1: TAP + PPI and Group 2: diclofenac + PPI. An agar well diffusion test was used to determine the efficacy of the experimental medicaments against E. faecalis (ATCC 29212). The diameter of inhibition zones was measured in millimeters using an inhibition zone measuring scale and the results were recorded.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>The statistical analysis was done using an analysis of variance and an unpaired <i>t</i>-test. <i>P</i> value was set at < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in the diameter of growth inhibition zones, with the greatest diameter noted for TAP + PPI followed by diclofenac sodium (DS) + PPI, TAP, DS, and PPI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The antimicrobial effectiveness of TAP + PPI was found to be superior to all other medicaments (DS + PPI, TAP, DS, and PPI).</p>","PeriodicalId":38892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry","volume":"26 1","pages":"79-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003294/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of antibacterial efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications and proton-pump inhibitor against <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>: An <i>in vitro</i> study.\",\"authors\":\"Akansha Tilokani,&nbsp;Pratik Agrawal,&nbsp;Prasanti Kumari Pradhan,&nbsp;Gaurav Patri,&nbsp;Nilormi Karmakar,&nbsp;Yash Sinha\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcd.jcd_419_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The present <i>in vitro</i> experimental study was undertaken to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial activity of triple antibiotic paste (TAP), diclofenac, and proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) against the microorganism Enterococcus faecalis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Three medicaments were selected for the study, TAP, diclofenac, and PPI. The experimental groups for the test were as follows: Part 1 - Group 1: TAP, Group 2: diclofenac, and Group 3: PPI; Part 2 - Group 1: TAP + PPI and Group 2: diclofenac + PPI. An agar well diffusion test was used to determine the efficacy of the experimental medicaments against E. faecalis (ATCC 29212). The diameter of inhibition zones was measured in millimeters using an inhibition zone measuring scale and the results were recorded.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>The statistical analysis was done using an analysis of variance and an unpaired <i>t</i>-test. <i>P</i> value was set at < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in the diameter of growth inhibition zones, with the greatest diameter noted for TAP + PPI followed by diclofenac sodium (DS) + PPI, TAP, DS, and PPI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The antimicrobial effectiveness of TAP + PPI was found to be superior to all other medicaments (DS + PPI, TAP, DS, and PPI).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Conservative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"79-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003294/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Conservative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_419_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/12/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_419_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价和比较三种抗生素糊剂(TAP)、双氯芬酸和质子泵抑制剂(PPI)对微生物粪肠球菌的抗菌活性。材料和方法:选择三种药物进行研究,TAP、双氯芬酸和PPI。试验的实验组如下:第1部分-第1组:TAP,第2组:双氯芬酸,第3组:PPI;第2部分-第1组:TAP+PPI,第2组:双氯芬酸+PPI。琼脂孔扩散试验用于确定实验药物对粪肠球菌(ATCC 29212)的疗效。使用抑制区测量标尺以毫米为单位测量抑制区的直径,并记录结果。统计分析:使用方差分析和非配对t检验进行统计分析。结果:生长抑制区的直径存在显著差异,TAP+PPI的直径最大,其次是双氯芬酸钠+PPI、TAP、DS和PPI。结论:TAP+PPI的抗菌效果优于所有其他药物(DS+PPI、TAP、DS和PPI)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative evaluation of antibacterial efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications and proton-pump inhibitor against <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>: An <i>in vitro</i> study.

Comparative evaluation of antibacterial efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications and proton-pump inhibitor against Enterococcus faecalis: An in vitro study.

Aim: The present in vitro experimental study was undertaken to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial activity of triple antibiotic paste (TAP), diclofenac, and proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) against the microorganism Enterococcus faecalis.

Materials and methods: Three medicaments were selected for the study, TAP, diclofenac, and PPI. The experimental groups for the test were as follows: Part 1 - Group 1: TAP, Group 2: diclofenac, and Group 3: PPI; Part 2 - Group 1: TAP + PPI and Group 2: diclofenac + PPI. An agar well diffusion test was used to determine the efficacy of the experimental medicaments against E. faecalis (ATCC 29212). The diameter of inhibition zones was measured in millimeters using an inhibition zone measuring scale and the results were recorded.

Statistical analysis: The statistical analysis was done using an analysis of variance and an unpaired t-test. P value was set at < 0.05.

Results: There was a significant difference in the diameter of growth inhibition zones, with the greatest diameter noted for TAP + PPI followed by diclofenac sodium (DS) + PPI, TAP, DS, and PPI.

Conclusions: The antimicrobial effectiveness of TAP + PPI was found to be superior to all other medicaments (DS + PPI, TAP, DS, and PPI).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Journal of Conservative Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal of Conservative Dentistry (ISSN - 0972-0707) is the official journal of the Indian Association of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics (IACDE). Our journal publishes scientific articles, case reports, short communications, invited reviews and comparative studies evaluating materials and methods in the fields of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Materials and Endodontics. J Conserv Dent has a diverse readership that includes full-time clinicians, full-time academicians, residents, students and scientists. Effective communication with this diverse readership requires careful attention to writing style.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信