COVID-19大流行中的公民语言景观、边界实践和符号学意识形态

IF 2.1 Q1 LINGUISTICS
P. Phyak, B. Sharma
{"title":"COVID-19大流行中的公民语言景观、边界实践和符号学意识形态","authors":"P. Phyak, B. Sharma","doi":"10.1075/ll.21035.phy","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article examines how Linguistic Landscapes in the Covid-19 pandemic construct the borders of place and people. We\n build on ‘semiotic ideology’ (Keane, 2018) and ‘semiotopology’ (Peck, Stroud & Williams, 2018) to analyze the bordering practices in citizen Linguistic Landscapes\n during the pandemic in Nepal. Our analysis shows that citizens combine multiple semiotic resources, both linguistic and\n non-linguistic, to create physical boundaries to restrict the mobility of people during the pandemic. However, the findings show\n that such practices are ideological; they promote the othering of the tenants, returnees from abroad/outside the valley, and\n non-locals. We argue that keeping place and people at the centre of analysis provides a critical framework to widen the scope of\n Linguistic Landscapes as a broad visual and semiotic space that embodies the bordering practices and categorization of people and\n their impacts on emotions, identities, and sense of belonging.","PeriodicalId":53129,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Landscape-An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Citizen Linguistic Landscape, bordering practices, and semiotic ideology in the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"P. Phyak, B. Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ll.21035.phy\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article examines how Linguistic Landscapes in the Covid-19 pandemic construct the borders of place and people. We\\n build on ‘semiotic ideology’ (Keane, 2018) and ‘semiotopology’ (Peck, Stroud & Williams, 2018) to analyze the bordering practices in citizen Linguistic Landscapes\\n during the pandemic in Nepal. Our analysis shows that citizens combine multiple semiotic resources, both linguistic and\\n non-linguistic, to create physical boundaries to restrict the mobility of people during the pandemic. However, the findings show\\n that such practices are ideological; they promote the othering of the tenants, returnees from abroad/outside the valley, and\\n non-locals. We argue that keeping place and people at the centre of analysis provides a critical framework to widen the scope of\\n Linguistic Landscapes as a broad visual and semiotic space that embodies the bordering practices and categorization of people and\\n their impacts on emotions, identities, and sense of belonging.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Landscape-An International Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Landscape-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.21035.phy\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Landscape-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.21035.phy","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文探讨了2019冠状病毒病大流行中的语言景观如何构建地方和人民的边界。我们以“符号学意识形态”(Keane, 2018)和“符号学”(Peck, Stroud & Williams, 2018)为基础,分析尼泊尔大流行期间公民语言景观中的边界实践。我们的分析表明,公民将语言和非语言的多种符号资源结合起来,以创建物理边界,限制人们在大流行期间的流动。然而,研究结果表明,这种做法是意识形态的;他们促进了租户、从国外/山谷外归来的人以及非本地人的交往。我们认为,将地点和人置于分析的中心,为扩大语言景观的范围提供了一个关键的框架,作为一个广阔的视觉和符号学空间,它体现了人们的边界实践和分类及其对情感、身份和归属感的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Citizen Linguistic Landscape, bordering practices, and semiotic ideology in the COVID-19 pandemic
This article examines how Linguistic Landscapes in the Covid-19 pandemic construct the borders of place and people. We build on ‘semiotic ideology’ (Keane, 2018) and ‘semiotopology’ (Peck, Stroud & Williams, 2018) to analyze the bordering practices in citizen Linguistic Landscapes during the pandemic in Nepal. Our analysis shows that citizens combine multiple semiotic resources, both linguistic and non-linguistic, to create physical boundaries to restrict the mobility of people during the pandemic. However, the findings show that such practices are ideological; they promote the othering of the tenants, returnees from abroad/outside the valley, and non-locals. We argue that keeping place and people at the centre of analysis provides a critical framework to widen the scope of Linguistic Landscapes as a broad visual and semiotic space that embodies the bordering practices and categorization of people and their impacts on emotions, identities, and sense of belonging.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
30.40%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信