西班牙市场婴儿配方奶粉铅含量及毒理学贡献

R. Moreno-Rojas, P. J. Sánchez-Segarra, C. Cañal-Ruíz, M. A. Amaro-López, G. Zurera-Cosano
{"title":"西班牙市场婴儿配方奶粉铅含量及毒理学贡献","authors":"R. Moreno-Rojas, P. J. Sánchez-Segarra, C. Cañal-Ruíz, M. A. Amaro-López, G. Zurera-Cosano","doi":"10.1080/02652030110085377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lead content was investigated in infant formulas by using graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy (GFAAS). Formulas were distinguished as ‘beginner’, ‘continuation’ and ‘special infant formula’, the latter being classified as subtypes ‘hypoallergenic’, ‘without lactose’, ‘vegetable base’ and ‘others’. The mean concentrations of lead were 25.7±8.4, 36.9±6.4 and 43.5±16.3 μgkg−1 for beginner, continuation and special infant formula, respectively. Two-factor (types and subtypes) variance analyses were made and Tukey's mean homogeneity test (p <0.05) was also performed for the formation of homogeneous groups. Significant differences (p < 0.001) were observed between types and two homogeneous groups were formed by the special infant formula type, with the highest lead content; the other group was constituted by the beginner type; and included in both groups were the continuation type infant formula. Their contribution to the provisional weekly intake (PTWI) was calculated from the mean concentrations in each type of infant formula, showing them to be food with a low toxicological risk (<30% PTWI).","PeriodicalId":12310,"journal":{"name":"Food Additives & Contaminants","volume":"19 1","pages":"241 - 245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lead content in Spanish market infant formulas and toxicological contribution\",\"authors\":\"R. Moreno-Rojas, P. J. Sánchez-Segarra, C. Cañal-Ruíz, M. A. Amaro-López, G. Zurera-Cosano\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02652030110085377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lead content was investigated in infant formulas by using graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy (GFAAS). Formulas were distinguished as ‘beginner’, ‘continuation’ and ‘special infant formula’, the latter being classified as subtypes ‘hypoallergenic’, ‘without lactose’, ‘vegetable base’ and ‘others’. The mean concentrations of lead were 25.7±8.4, 36.9±6.4 and 43.5±16.3 μgkg−1 for beginner, continuation and special infant formula, respectively. Two-factor (types and subtypes) variance analyses were made and Tukey's mean homogeneity test (p <0.05) was also performed for the formation of homogeneous groups. Significant differences (p < 0.001) were observed between types and two homogeneous groups were formed by the special infant formula type, with the highest lead content; the other group was constituted by the beginner type; and included in both groups were the continuation type infant formula. Their contribution to the provisional weekly intake (PTWI) was calculated from the mean concentrations in each type of infant formula, showing them to be food with a low toxicological risk (<30% PTWI).\",\"PeriodicalId\":12310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Additives & Contaminants\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"241 - 245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Additives & Contaminants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030110085377\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Additives & Contaminants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030110085377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

采用石墨炉原子吸收光谱法(GFAAS)对婴儿配方奶粉中的铅含量进行了研究。配方奶粉被区分为“初级”、“继续”和“特殊婴儿配方奶粉”,后者被分类为“低过敏性”、“不含乳糖”、“植物基础”和“其他”亚型。初级配方奶粉、延续配方奶粉和特殊配方奶粉的平均铅浓度分别为25.7±8.4、36.9±6.4和43.5±16.3 μgkg−1。进行两因素(类型和亚型)方差分析,并进行Tukey均数齐性检验(p <0.05)。不同类型间存在显著性差异(p < 0.001),以特殊婴幼儿配方奶粉类型形成两个同质组,铅含量最高;另一组由初学者组成;两组中都包括延续型婴儿配方奶粉。它们对临时周摄入量(PTWI)的贡献是根据每种婴儿配方奶粉的平均浓度计算出来的,表明它们是毒性风险较低的食物(PTWI <30%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lead content in Spanish market infant formulas and toxicological contribution
Lead content was investigated in infant formulas by using graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy (GFAAS). Formulas were distinguished as ‘beginner’, ‘continuation’ and ‘special infant formula’, the latter being classified as subtypes ‘hypoallergenic’, ‘without lactose’, ‘vegetable base’ and ‘others’. The mean concentrations of lead were 25.7±8.4, 36.9±6.4 and 43.5±16.3 μgkg−1 for beginner, continuation and special infant formula, respectively. Two-factor (types and subtypes) variance analyses were made and Tukey's mean homogeneity test (p <0.05) was also performed for the formation of homogeneous groups. Significant differences (p < 0.001) were observed between types and two homogeneous groups were formed by the special infant formula type, with the highest lead content; the other group was constituted by the beginner type; and included in both groups were the continuation type infant formula. Their contribution to the provisional weekly intake (PTWI) was calculated from the mean concentrations in each type of infant formula, showing them to be food with a low toxicological risk (<30% PTWI).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信