跨职能团队:管理的中心研究途径

IF 0.5 Q4 MANAGEMENT
E. Kalabina, Olga Belyak
{"title":"跨职能团队:管理的中心研究途径","authors":"E. Kalabina, Olga Belyak","doi":"10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-6-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The search for alternative forms of employment amid social perturbations (the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences), as well as technical (total digitalization) and organizational-managerial factors has increased the interest of Russian companies in cross-functional teams (CFTs). However, forming CFTs is accompanied by various obstacles associated primarily with the fragmentation and inconsistency of ideas about their essence and management methods. The paper analyses the central avenues for studying CFTs and regulating their activities. Methodologically, the study rests on the principles of the managerial approach to team-building, as well as knowledge and knowledge-intensive capital management. The methods of expert (selective) systematic, terminological and comparative analysis were used. The information base includes 79 publications released in 2011-2021 and indexed in the Google Scholar and eLibrary scientific databases. The works under consideration focus on trends and management practice in the sphere of CFTs, analyze their essence and control methods applied by the team leaders. The present research forms the relevant systematized idea about the nature of CFTs and the specifics of their activities in the context of company management transformation. The performed terminological analysis allowed establishing the attributes inherent in cross-functional teams and the advantages of this type of teams when dealing with various challenges. As indicated by the findings, the level of cross-functionality affects the integration ability of team members and the choice of management tools. The research identifies situational and contextual variables that determine CFTs' effectiveness: internal team environment, effective exchange of knowledge, clear team goals, shared vision, etc. The data obtained can be used to conduct further empirical study of CFTs' management and activities.","PeriodicalId":42955,"journal":{"name":"Upravlenets-The Manager","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-functional teams: Central research avenues in management\",\"authors\":\"E. Kalabina, Olga Belyak\",\"doi\":\"10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-6-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The search for alternative forms of employment amid social perturbations (the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences), as well as technical (total digitalization) and organizational-managerial factors has increased the interest of Russian companies in cross-functional teams (CFTs). However, forming CFTs is accompanied by various obstacles associated primarily with the fragmentation and inconsistency of ideas about their essence and management methods. The paper analyses the central avenues for studying CFTs and regulating their activities. Methodologically, the study rests on the principles of the managerial approach to team-building, as well as knowledge and knowledge-intensive capital management. The methods of expert (selective) systematic, terminological and comparative analysis were used. The information base includes 79 publications released in 2011-2021 and indexed in the Google Scholar and eLibrary scientific databases. The works under consideration focus on trends and management practice in the sphere of CFTs, analyze their essence and control methods applied by the team leaders. The present research forms the relevant systematized idea about the nature of CFTs and the specifics of their activities in the context of company management transformation. The performed terminological analysis allowed establishing the attributes inherent in cross-functional teams and the advantages of this type of teams when dealing with various challenges. As indicated by the findings, the level of cross-functionality affects the integration ability of team members and the choice of management tools. The research identifies situational and contextual variables that determine CFTs' effectiveness: internal team environment, effective exchange of knowledge, clear team goals, shared vision, etc. The data obtained can be used to conduct further empirical study of CFTs' management and activities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Upravlenets-The Manager\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Upravlenets-The Manager\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-6-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upravlenets-The Manager","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-6-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在社会动荡(COVID-19大流行及其后果)以及技术(全面数字化)和组织管理因素的影响下,寻找替代就业形式增加了俄罗斯公司对跨职能团队(CFTs)的兴趣。然而,中国特色社会主义基金的形成面临着各种障碍,主要是对其本质和管理方法的认识不统一、不统一。本文分析了研究基金组织和规范基金组织活动的主要途径。在方法上,这项研究以建立团队的管理方法原则以及知识和知识密集型资本管理原则为基础。采用专家(选择性)系统分析、术语分析和比较分析的方法。该信息库包括2011-2021年发布的79篇出版物,并在谷歌学术和图书馆科学数据库中检索。研究的重点是CFTs领域的发展趋势和管理实践,分析了CFTs的本质和团队领导者应用的控制方法。本研究在公司管理转型的背景下,形成了相关的系统思想,探讨了企业管理团队的性质及其活动的具体情况。所执行的术语分析允许建立跨职能团队固有的属性,以及这种类型的团队在处理各种挑战时的优势。研究结果表明,跨职能水平影响团队成员的整合能力和管理工具的选择。研究确定了影响团队绩效的情境和语境变量:团队内部环境、有效的知识交流、明确的团队目标、共同的愿景等。所得数据可用于对CFTs的管理和活动进行进一步的实证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-functional teams: Central research avenues in management
The search for alternative forms of employment amid social perturbations (the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences), as well as technical (total digitalization) and organizational-managerial factors has increased the interest of Russian companies in cross-functional teams (CFTs). However, forming CFTs is accompanied by various obstacles associated primarily with the fragmentation and inconsistency of ideas about their essence and management methods. The paper analyses the central avenues for studying CFTs and regulating their activities. Methodologically, the study rests on the principles of the managerial approach to team-building, as well as knowledge and knowledge-intensive capital management. The methods of expert (selective) systematic, terminological and comparative analysis were used. The information base includes 79 publications released in 2011-2021 and indexed in the Google Scholar and eLibrary scientific databases. The works under consideration focus on trends and management practice in the sphere of CFTs, analyze their essence and control methods applied by the team leaders. The present research forms the relevant systematized idea about the nature of CFTs and the specifics of their activities in the context of company management transformation. The performed terminological analysis allowed establishing the attributes inherent in cross-functional teams and the advantages of this type of teams when dealing with various challenges. As indicated by the findings, the level of cross-functionality affects the integration ability of team members and the choice of management tools. The research identifies situational and contextual variables that determine CFTs' effectiveness: internal team environment, effective exchange of knowledge, clear team goals, shared vision, etc. The data obtained can be used to conduct further empirical study of CFTs' management and activities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
40.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信