对拉里萨的波利克利特碎片的思考(FGrHist 128 F3 = Strab)。15、21):解释大国王的经济活动?

Q2 Arts and Humanities

Erga-Logoi Pub Date : 2020-12-21 DOI:10.7358/erga-2020-002-bion

E. Biondi

{"title":"对拉里萨的波利克利特碎片的思考(FGrHist 128 F3 = Strab)。15、21):解释大国王的经济活动?","authors":"E. Biondi","doi":"10.7358/erga-2020-002-bion","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this article is to propose an historical analysis of the fragment FGrHist 128 F3 (= Strab. XV 3, 21) of the historian Polykleitos of Larissa. Polykleitos reports mostly administrative and economic news on the Persian Great King’s activity and testifies to a new approach to the study of the Persian Empire and its tribute system compared to Herodotus: these are complex evidences clarified in the light of the Aristotelian reflection on the oikonomia and the politics of Macedonians in Asia.","PeriodicalId":37877,"journal":{"name":"Erga-Logoi","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Riflessioni su un frammento di Policleto di Larissa (FGrHist 128 F3 = Strab. XV 3, 21): interpretatio graeca dell’attività economica del Gran Re?\",\"authors\":\"E. Biondi\",\"doi\":\"10.7358/erga-2020-002-bion\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this article is to propose an historical analysis of the fragment FGrHist 128 F3 (= Strab. XV 3, 21) of the historian Polykleitos of Larissa. Polykleitos reports mostly administrative and economic news on the Persian Great King’s activity and testifies to a new approach to the study of the Persian Empire and its tribute system compared to Herodotus: these are complex evidences clarified in the light of the Aristotelian reflection on the oikonomia and the politics of Macedonians in Asia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Erga-Logoi\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Erga-Logoi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7358/erga-2020-002-bion\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Erga-Logoi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7358/erga-2020-002-bion","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是对片段FGrHist 128 F3 (= Strab)进行历史分析。拉瑞萨的历史学家Polykleitos的著作。Polykleitos主要报道波斯国王活动的行政和经济新闻，并证明了与希罗多德相比，波斯帝国及其贡品制度研究的新方法:这些是亚里士多德对经济和马其顿人在亚洲的政治的反思所澄清的复杂证据。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Riflessioni su un frammento di Policleto di Larissa (FGrHist 128 F3 = Strab. XV 3, 21): interpretatio graeca dell’attività economica del Gran Re?

The aim of this article is to propose an historical analysis of the fragment FGrHist 128 F3 (= Strab. XV 3, 21) of the historian Polykleitos of Larissa. Polykleitos reports mostly administrative and economic news on the Persian Great King’s activity and testifies to a new approach to the study of the Persian Empire and its tribute system compared to Herodotus: these are complex evidences clarified in the light of the Aristotelian reflection on the oikonomia and the politics of Macedonians in Asia.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Erga-Logoi Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory

CiteScore

0.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

14 weeks

期刊介绍： Erga-Logoi is a peer-reviewed open-access journal of ancient history, literature, law and culture, as broadly conceived in geographical and chronological terms. Evoking Thucydides'' methodological exordium (although in that context the opposition obviously has a different value), the name of the Journal was chosen to reflect its intention of looking at the ancient world paying attention to both “facts” (historical events, artistic production, material culture) and “words” (literary, historical, legal production in its oral and written forms). On these bases, the Journal embraces a unified approach to the ancient world, rejecting sectional perspectives for an interdisciplinary focus, reflecting these complex articulated civilizations. The Journal, published every six months, is open to contributions of a historical, philological, literary, archaeological, artistic, and legal nature. It is multilingual, thereby aiming to foster the development of international debate on the ancient world and its legacy.