Re/通过实践制定移民政策

Q1 Social Sciences
Kathryn Tomko Dennler
{"title":"Re/通过实践制定移民政策","authors":"Kathryn Tomko Dennler","doi":"10.3167/ARMS.2017.010108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Refused asylum seekers living in the UK face hostility and legal restrictions\non the basis of immigration status that limit access to statutory support, employment,\nand social goods. Working at a non-profit organization that offered an advice service\nfor refused asylum seekers, I observed how the experiences of refused asylum seekers\nare constituted not simply by restrictions within immigration law, but rather by the\nways in which laws are perceived and implemented by a wide range of actors. I argue\nthat the legal consciousness of social workers hostile to refused asylum seekers plays\nan important role in making policy through practice. I show that social workers prioritized\nimmigration enforcement over other legal obligations, thereby amplifying the\nmeaning of immigration status and deepening the marginalization of refused asylum\nseekers.","PeriodicalId":52702,"journal":{"name":"Migration and Society","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re/Making Immigration Policy through Practice\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn Tomko Dennler\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/ARMS.2017.010108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Refused asylum seekers living in the UK face hostility and legal restrictions\\non the basis of immigration status that limit access to statutory support, employment,\\nand social goods. Working at a non-profit organization that offered an advice service\\nfor refused asylum seekers, I observed how the experiences of refused asylum seekers\\nare constituted not simply by restrictions within immigration law, but rather by the\\nways in which laws are perceived and implemented by a wide range of actors. I argue\\nthat the legal consciousness of social workers hostile to refused asylum seekers plays\\nan important role in making policy through practice. I show that social workers prioritized\\nimmigration enforcement over other legal obligations, thereby amplifying the\\nmeaning of immigration status and deepening the marginalization of refused asylum\\nseekers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Migration and Society\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Migration and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/ARMS.2017.010108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Migration and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/ARMS.2017.010108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

居住在英国的被拒绝的寻求庇护者面临敌意和基于移民身份的法律限制,限制他们获得法定支持、就业和社会福利。在一家为被拒绝的寻求庇护者提供咨询服务的非营利组织工作时,我观察到,被拒绝的寻求庇护者的经历不仅仅是由移民法的限制构成的,而是由广泛的行动者感知和执行法律的方式构成的。我认为,社会工作者对被拒绝的寻求庇护者怀有敌意的法律意识在通过实践制定政策方面发挥了重要作用。我表明,社会工作者将移民执法置于其他法律义务之上,从而放大了移民身份的意义,并加深了被拒绝的寻求庇护者的边缘化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Re/Making Immigration Policy through Practice
Refused asylum seekers living in the UK face hostility and legal restrictions on the basis of immigration status that limit access to statutory support, employment, and social goods. Working at a non-profit organization that offered an advice service for refused asylum seekers, I observed how the experiences of refused asylum seekers are constituted not simply by restrictions within immigration law, but rather by the ways in which laws are perceived and implemented by a wide range of actors. I argue that the legal consciousness of social workers hostile to refused asylum seekers plays an important role in making policy through practice. I show that social workers prioritized immigration enforcement over other legal obligations, thereby amplifying the meaning of immigration status and deepening the marginalization of refused asylum seekers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信