必要性评估是在有害恢复研究所进行的吗?

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW

Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review Pub Date : 2021-07-12 DOI:10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-2-217-244

H. Koziol

{"title":"必要性评估是在有害恢复研究所进行的吗?","authors":"H. Koziol","doi":"10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-2-217-244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article of one of the most prominent contemporary representatives of “bewegliches System” conception of private law regulation provides a thorough examination of factors influencing the leading approachs to assessment of fault in german speaking jurisdictions. The author comes to conclusion that unconditional adherence to unified (either subjective or objective) approach shall not attend to the ends pursued by particular intitutions aggregated under the name of civil liability, whereas the ethically underpinned concept of liability requires subjective approach as a general rule for noncontractual liability.","PeriodicalId":35992,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IS THE NECESSITY ASSESSMENT AT THE INSTITUTE OF HARMFUL RECOVERY?\",\"authors\":\"H. Koziol\",\"doi\":\"10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-2-217-244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article of one of the most prominent contemporary representatives of “bewegliches System” conception of private law regulation provides a thorough examination of factors influencing the leading approachs to assessment of fault in german speaking jurisdictions. The author comes to conclusion that unconditional adherence to unified (either subjective or objective) approach shall not attend to the ends pursued by particular intitutions aggregated under the name of civil liability, whereas the ethically underpinned concept of liability requires subjective approach as a general rule for noncontractual liability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-2-217-244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-2-217-244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章是当代最杰出的代表之一的私法规制的“bewegliches系统”的概念提供了一个全面的因素，影响主要的方法来评估过错在德语司法管辖区。作者的结论是，无条件地坚持统一的(主观或客观的)方法，并不适用于以民事责任为名的特定机构所追求的目的，而道德基础的责任概念要求主观方法作为非合同责任的一般规则。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

IS THE NECESSITY ASSESSMENT AT THE INSTITUTE OF HARMFUL RECOVERY?

The article of one of the most prominent contemporary representatives of “bewegliches System” conception of private law regulation provides a thorough examination of factors influencing the leading approachs to assessment of fault in german speaking jurisdictions. The author comes to conclusion that unconditional adherence to unified (either subjective or objective) approach shall not attend to the ends pursued by particular intitutions aggregated under the name of civil liability, whereas the ethically underpinned concept of liability requires subjective approach as a general rule for noncontractual liability.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review (CR-CL) is the nation’s leading progressive law journal. Founded in 1966 as an instrument to advance personal freedoms and human dignities, CR-CL seeks to catalyze progressive thought and dialogue through publishing innovative legal scholarship and from various perspectives and in diverse fields of study.