索马里现行反洗钱和反资助恐怖主义制度的批判性分析:与马来西亚的比较研究

IF 1.3 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Abdirahman Hassan Hersi
{"title":"索马里现行反洗钱和反资助恐怖主义制度的批判性分析:与马来西亚的比较研究","authors":"Abdirahman Hassan Hersi","doi":"10.1108/jmlc-05-2023-0090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nConcerns on money laundering (ML) and terrorist financing increased, as ML accounted 2%–5% of the global GDP, with Switzerland, the USA, Canada, India and Russia having high laundering rates. Banks were fined over US$320bn in 2008, but money laundering still accounted for 3.6% of global GDP in 2009, thereby indicating the need for effective regimes. Therefore, this study aims to critically analyze the antimoney laundering (AML)/CFT regime of Somalia, identify loopholes in the regime, raise awareness and propose recommendations for regime improvement.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe qualitative research approach is used to compare Somalia’s AML/CFT regime with the corresponding regime of Malaysia through the black letter method combined with document analysis. Malaysia is selected as a benchmark for two reasons: firstly, it is an Islamic country like Somalia, and secondly, Malaysia has complied with integrity-related standards.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study revealed that an impactful AML/CTF regime is reached by closing loopholes in the law, reevaluating and improving regulatory agencies and measures, facilitating formal financial services and collaborating with regional and international standard setters. According to the results, Somalia AML/CFT regime is counterproductive in criminalizing offenses; regulating digital currencies and mobile money, disclosures and nonfinancial business and provisions; and governing training requirements for regulatory agencies and financial institutions.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the author’s knowledge, this paper is the first of its kind in the study of Somalia’s regime building. Also, this study incorporates rich scholarly discourse on effective regime building.\n","PeriodicalId":46042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Money Laundering Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A critical analysis of Somalia’s current antimoney laundering and counter financing of terrorism regime: a comparative study with Malaysia\",\"authors\":\"Abdirahman Hassan Hersi\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jmlc-05-2023-0090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nConcerns on money laundering (ML) and terrorist financing increased, as ML accounted 2%–5% of the global GDP, with Switzerland, the USA, Canada, India and Russia having high laundering rates. Banks were fined over US$320bn in 2008, but money laundering still accounted for 3.6% of global GDP in 2009, thereby indicating the need for effective regimes. Therefore, this study aims to critically analyze the antimoney laundering (AML)/CFT regime of Somalia, identify loopholes in the regime, raise awareness and propose recommendations for regime improvement.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe qualitative research approach is used to compare Somalia’s AML/CFT regime with the corresponding regime of Malaysia through the black letter method combined with document analysis. Malaysia is selected as a benchmark for two reasons: firstly, it is an Islamic country like Somalia, and secondly, Malaysia has complied with integrity-related standards.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThis study revealed that an impactful AML/CTF regime is reached by closing loopholes in the law, reevaluating and improving regulatory agencies and measures, facilitating formal financial services and collaborating with regional and international standard setters. According to the results, Somalia AML/CFT regime is counterproductive in criminalizing offenses; regulating digital currencies and mobile money, disclosures and nonfinancial business and provisions; and governing training requirements for regulatory agencies and financial institutions.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nTo the best of the author’s knowledge, this paper is the first of its kind in the study of Somalia’s regime building. Also, this study incorporates rich scholarly discourse on effective regime building.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":46042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Money Laundering Control\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Money Laundering Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmlc-05-2023-0090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Money Laundering Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmlc-05-2023-0090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对洗钱(ML)和恐怖主义融资的担忧增加,因为ML占全球GDP的2%-5%,瑞士、美国、加拿大、印度和俄罗斯的洗钱率很高。2008年银行被罚款超过3200亿美元,但2009年洗钱仍占全球GDP的3.6%,因此表明需要有效的制度。因此,本研究旨在批判性地分析索马里的反洗钱(AML)/CFT制度,找出制度中的漏洞,提高认识并提出制度改进建议。设计/方法/方法采用定性研究方法,通过黑字法结合文献分析,将索马里的反洗钱/反恐融资制度与马来西亚的相应制度进行比较。马来西亚被选为标杆有两个原因:首先,它是一个像索马里一样的伊斯兰国家,其次,马来西亚遵守了与诚信有关的标准。研究结果表明,通过弥补法律漏洞、重新评估和改进监管机构和措施、促进正式金融服务以及与地区和国际标准制定者合作,可以实现有影响力的“反洗钱”/CTF制度。结果表明,索马里反洗钱/反恐融资制度在将犯罪定为刑事犯罪方面适得其反;监管数字货币和移动货币,披露和非金融业务和规定;管理监管机构和金融机构的培训要求。原创性/价值据作者所知,本文是研究索马里政权建设的第一篇同类论文。此外,本研究还包含了丰富的关于有效制度建设的学术论述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A critical analysis of Somalia’s current antimoney laundering and counter financing of terrorism regime: a comparative study with Malaysia
Purpose Concerns on money laundering (ML) and terrorist financing increased, as ML accounted 2%–5% of the global GDP, with Switzerland, the USA, Canada, India and Russia having high laundering rates. Banks were fined over US$320bn in 2008, but money laundering still accounted for 3.6% of global GDP in 2009, thereby indicating the need for effective regimes. Therefore, this study aims to critically analyze the antimoney laundering (AML)/CFT regime of Somalia, identify loopholes in the regime, raise awareness and propose recommendations for regime improvement. Design/methodology/approach The qualitative research approach is used to compare Somalia’s AML/CFT regime with the corresponding regime of Malaysia through the black letter method combined with document analysis. Malaysia is selected as a benchmark for two reasons: firstly, it is an Islamic country like Somalia, and secondly, Malaysia has complied with integrity-related standards. Findings This study revealed that an impactful AML/CTF regime is reached by closing loopholes in the law, reevaluating and improving regulatory agencies and measures, facilitating formal financial services and collaborating with regional and international standard setters. According to the results, Somalia AML/CFT regime is counterproductive in criminalizing offenses; regulating digital currencies and mobile money, disclosures and nonfinancial business and provisions; and governing training requirements for regulatory agencies and financial institutions. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this paper is the first of its kind in the study of Somalia’s regime building. Also, this study incorporates rich scholarly discourse on effective regime building.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Money Laundering Control
Journal of Money Laundering Control CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
27.30%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信