水泥和饮料对陶瓷透光性的影响

Monica Micheal, A. Korsel, Fatma A Hasaneen
{"title":"水泥和饮料对陶瓷透光性的影响","authors":"Monica Micheal, A. Korsel, Fatma A Hasaneen","doi":"10.4103/tdj.tdj_28_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim To measure translucency of two ceramic materials with different cements and beverages, and compare them to each other. Settings and design In vitro comparative study. Materials and methods One hundred twenty ceramic discs (10 mm diameter, 0.5 mm thickness) from IPS e-max press (n = 60) and Celtra press (n = 60), shade A2 LT were assessed. Two cements [Rely X Ultimate resin cement (RC)] and [Nexus resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC)] applied to ceramic discs with 0.2 mm thickness through custom-made Teflon mold. Specimens were immersed in two beverages (tea and cola) for 4 h/day for 1 week at room temperature. Translucency parameter (TP) of ceramic discs was measured according to CIE L*a*b* system. Statistical analysis used One-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post-hoc test. Results IPS e-max press showed higher TP values than Celtra press. Discs cemented with RC had higher TP values than those cemented with RMGIC. TP values decreased after immersion in both beverages, with higher TP values to those immersed in cola than those immersed in tea. Conclusion IPS e-max press was more translucent than Celtra press A2 LT discs. RC resin cement could be used to cement veneers with a high final esthetic outcome.","PeriodicalId":22324,"journal":{"name":"Tanta Dental Journal","volume":"74 1","pages":"57 - 60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of cements and beverages on ceramics translucency\",\"authors\":\"Monica Micheal, A. Korsel, Fatma A Hasaneen\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/tdj.tdj_28_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim To measure translucency of two ceramic materials with different cements and beverages, and compare them to each other. Settings and design In vitro comparative study. Materials and methods One hundred twenty ceramic discs (10 mm diameter, 0.5 mm thickness) from IPS e-max press (n = 60) and Celtra press (n = 60), shade A2 LT were assessed. Two cements [Rely X Ultimate resin cement (RC)] and [Nexus resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC)] applied to ceramic discs with 0.2 mm thickness through custom-made Teflon mold. Specimens were immersed in two beverages (tea and cola) for 4 h/day for 1 week at room temperature. Translucency parameter (TP) of ceramic discs was measured according to CIE L*a*b* system. Statistical analysis used One-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post-hoc test. Results IPS e-max press showed higher TP values than Celtra press. Discs cemented with RC had higher TP values than those cemented with RMGIC. TP values decreased after immersion in both beverages, with higher TP values to those immersed in cola than those immersed in tea. Conclusion IPS e-max press was more translucent than Celtra press A2 LT discs. RC resin cement could be used to cement veneers with a high final esthetic outcome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tanta Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"57 - 60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tanta Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/tdj.tdj_28_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanta Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tdj.tdj_28_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的测定两种不同水泥和饮料的陶瓷材料的透光率,并进行比较。设置与设计体外比较研究。材料与方法对IPS e-max压力机(n = 60)和Celtra压力机(n = 60)的120个陶瓷盘(直径10 mm,厚度0.5 mm)进行评估,颜色为A2 LT。两种水泥(Rely X Ultimate resin cement (RC))和Nexus resin-modified glass - ionomer cement (RMGIC))通过定制的Teflon模具应用于0.2 mm厚度的陶瓷盘。将标本在两种饮料(茶和可乐)中室温浸泡4小时/天,持续1周。采用CIE L*a*b*体系测量陶瓷片的半透明参数(TP)。统计分析采用单因素方差分析和Tukey事后检验。结果IPS e-max压力机的TP值高于Celtra压力机。RC胶结椎间盘的TP值高于RMGIC胶结椎间盘。两种饮料浸泡后TP值都有所下降,可乐浸泡后TP值高于茶浸泡后TP值。结论IPS e-max压片比Celtra压片A2 LT椎间盘更透明。RC树脂水泥可用于胶结贴面,具有较高的最终美观效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of cements and beverages on ceramics translucency
Aim To measure translucency of two ceramic materials with different cements and beverages, and compare them to each other. Settings and design In vitro comparative study. Materials and methods One hundred twenty ceramic discs (10 mm diameter, 0.5 mm thickness) from IPS e-max press (n = 60) and Celtra press (n = 60), shade A2 LT were assessed. Two cements [Rely X Ultimate resin cement (RC)] and [Nexus resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC)] applied to ceramic discs with 0.2 mm thickness through custom-made Teflon mold. Specimens were immersed in two beverages (tea and cola) for 4 h/day for 1 week at room temperature. Translucency parameter (TP) of ceramic discs was measured according to CIE L*a*b* system. Statistical analysis used One-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post-hoc test. Results IPS e-max press showed higher TP values than Celtra press. Discs cemented with RC had higher TP values than those cemented with RMGIC. TP values decreased after immersion in both beverages, with higher TP values to those immersed in cola than those immersed in tea. Conclusion IPS e-max press was more translucent than Celtra press A2 LT discs. RC resin cement could be used to cement veneers with a high final esthetic outcome.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信