一个反对潮流的哲学家:卡尔纳普与热物理的信息化

IF 0.4 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Javier Anta
{"title":"一个反对潮流的哲学家:卡尔纳普与热物理的信息化","authors":"Javier Anta","doi":"10.1086/718416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article I aim to demonstrate that Rudolf Carnap’s analysis of the application of information theory within physics, an analysis that is an intellectual-historical precedent of current philosophical criticisms of the information theoretical tendency, is justified. First, Carnap and Bar-Hillel underlined the unjustified ‘semantification’ of Shannon entropy. Furthermore, Carnap criticized the ‘physicalization’ of Shannon entropy, but that criticism was not accepted by the physics community of the 1950s. Finally, in the posthumously published Two Essays on Entropy, Carnap developed a critical assessment of entropy concepts that showed deep conceptual and interpretative deficiencies in Jaynes’s and Brillouin’s informational approaches to thermophysics.","PeriodicalId":42878,"journal":{"name":"HOPOS-The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science","volume":"4 1","pages":"43 - 67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Philosopher against the Bandwagon: Carnap and the Informationalization of Thermal Physics\",\"authors\":\"Javier Anta\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/718416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article I aim to demonstrate that Rudolf Carnap’s analysis of the application of information theory within physics, an analysis that is an intellectual-historical precedent of current philosophical criticisms of the information theoretical tendency, is justified. First, Carnap and Bar-Hillel underlined the unjustified ‘semantification’ of Shannon entropy. Furthermore, Carnap criticized the ‘physicalization’ of Shannon entropy, but that criticism was not accepted by the physics community of the 1950s. Finally, in the posthumously published Two Essays on Entropy, Carnap developed a critical assessment of entropy concepts that showed deep conceptual and interpretative deficiencies in Jaynes’s and Brillouin’s informational approaches to thermophysics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HOPOS-The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"43 - 67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HOPOS-The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/718416\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HOPOS-The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/718416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我旨在证明鲁道夫·卡尔纳普(Rudolf Carnap)对信息论在物理学中的应用的分析是合理的,这种分析是当前对信息论倾向的哲学批评的智力历史先例。首先,卡尔纳普和巴尔-希勒尔强调了香农熵的不合理的“语义化”。此外,卡尔纳普还批评了香农熵的“物理化”,但这一批评并未被20世纪50年代的物理界所接受。最后,在他死后发表的《关于熵的两篇论文》中,卡尔纳普对熵的概念进行了批判性的评估,指出了杰恩斯和布里渊的热物理学信息方法在概念和解释上的深刻缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Philosopher against the Bandwagon: Carnap and the Informationalization of Thermal Physics
In this article I aim to demonstrate that Rudolf Carnap’s analysis of the application of information theory within physics, an analysis that is an intellectual-historical precedent of current philosophical criticisms of the information theoretical tendency, is justified. First, Carnap and Bar-Hillel underlined the unjustified ‘semantification’ of Shannon entropy. Furthermore, Carnap criticized the ‘physicalization’ of Shannon entropy, but that criticism was not accepted by the physics community of the 1950s. Finally, in the posthumously published Two Essays on Entropy, Carnap developed a critical assessment of entropy concepts that showed deep conceptual and interpretative deficiencies in Jaynes’s and Brillouin’s informational approaches to thermophysics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信