测定鞋的防滑性的试验方法的国际比较

K. Jung, H. Schenk
{"title":"测定鞋的防滑性的试验方法的国际比较","authors":"K. Jung,&nbsp;H. Schenk","doi":"10.1016/0376-6349(90)90034-S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Co-operative tests were conducted by a working group of the “foot protection” ISO standardizing committee, with the participation of seven countries, using a total of 10 different testing methods for determining shoe anti-slip characteristics.</p><p>The friction coefficients, cof, thereby obtained were processed and condensed for statistical evaluation. Ten testing methods were compared, grouped into six testing machine variants, two sole-section methods and two test-person methods.</p><p>There are significant inter-relationships between the results of the various testing machines. This is especially true for the steel/glycerine floor/lubricant combination, for which a significant inter-relationship was shown between all testing machines.</p><p>No general relationship can be determined between the both sole-section methods on the one hand, and the testing machines on the other.</p><p>There are strong indications of a relationship between the test-person methods and the testing machines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100816,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Accidents","volume":"13 4","pages":"Pages 271-290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0376-6349(90)90034-S","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An international comparison of test methods for determining the slip resistance of shoes\",\"authors\":\"K. Jung,&nbsp;H. Schenk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0376-6349(90)90034-S\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Co-operative tests were conducted by a working group of the “foot protection” ISO standardizing committee, with the participation of seven countries, using a total of 10 different testing methods for determining shoe anti-slip characteristics.</p><p>The friction coefficients, cof, thereby obtained were processed and condensed for statistical evaluation. Ten testing methods were compared, grouped into six testing machine variants, two sole-section methods and two test-person methods.</p><p>There are significant inter-relationships between the results of the various testing machines. This is especially true for the steel/glycerine floor/lubricant combination, for which a significant inter-relationship was shown between all testing machines.</p><p>No general relationship can be determined between the both sole-section methods on the one hand, and the testing machines on the other.</p><p>There are strong indications of a relationship between the test-person methods and the testing machines.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational Accidents\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 271-290\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0376-6349(90)90034-S\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational Accidents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037663499090034S\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Accidents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037663499090034S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

由7个国家参与的"足部保护" ISO标准化委员会工作组进行了合作测试,共使用了10种不同的测试方法来确定鞋子的防滑特性。由此得到的摩擦系数(cof)进行了处理和浓缩,以便进行统计评估。对10种测试方法进行比较,分为6种试验机、2种鞋底切片法和2种测试人法。各种测试机器的结果之间存在显著的相互关系。对于钢/甘油地板/润滑剂组合尤其如此,所有测试机器之间都显示出显著的相互关系。一方面,这两种鞋底切片方法和另一方面的测试机器之间没有一般的关系。测试人员的方法和测试机器之间有很强的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An international comparison of test methods for determining the slip resistance of shoes

Co-operative tests were conducted by a working group of the “foot protection” ISO standardizing committee, with the participation of seven countries, using a total of 10 different testing methods for determining shoe anti-slip characteristics.

The friction coefficients, cof, thereby obtained were processed and condensed for statistical evaluation. Ten testing methods were compared, grouped into six testing machine variants, two sole-section methods and two test-person methods.

There are significant inter-relationships between the results of the various testing machines. This is especially true for the steel/glycerine floor/lubricant combination, for which a significant inter-relationship was shown between all testing machines.

No general relationship can be determined between the both sole-section methods on the one hand, and the testing machines on the other.

There are strong indications of a relationship between the test-person methods and the testing machines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信