方法比较分析创面愈合率。

Prabhpreet K Dhillon, Xinyin Li, J. Sanes, Oluwafemi Akintola, Bingyun Sun
{"title":"方法比较分析创面愈合率。","authors":"Prabhpreet K Dhillon, Xinyin Li, J. Sanes, Oluwafemi Akintola, Bingyun Sun","doi":"10.1139/bcb-2016-0163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wound healing scratch assay is a frequently used method to characterize cell migration, which is an important biological process in the course of development, tissue repair, and immune response for example. The measurement of wound healing rate, however, varies among different studies. Here we summarized these measurements into three types: (I) direct rate average; (II) regression rate average; and (III) average distance regression rate. Using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells as a model, we compared the three types of analyses on quantifying the wound closing rate, and discovered that type I & III measurements are more resistant to outliers, and type II analysis is more sensitive to outliers. We hope this study can help researchers to better use this simple yet effective assay.","PeriodicalId":9524,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of biochemistry and cell biology = Revue canadienne de biochimie et biologie cellulaire","volume":"21 1","pages":"450-454"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Method comparison for analyzing wound healing rates.\",\"authors\":\"Prabhpreet K Dhillon, Xinyin Li, J. Sanes, Oluwafemi Akintola, Bingyun Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/bcb-2016-0163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Wound healing scratch assay is a frequently used method to characterize cell migration, which is an important biological process in the course of development, tissue repair, and immune response for example. The measurement of wound healing rate, however, varies among different studies. Here we summarized these measurements into three types: (I) direct rate average; (II) regression rate average; and (III) average distance regression rate. Using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells as a model, we compared the three types of analyses on quantifying the wound closing rate, and discovered that type I & III measurements are more resistant to outliers, and type II analysis is more sensitive to outliers. We hope this study can help researchers to better use this simple yet effective assay.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian journal of biochemistry and cell biology = Revue canadienne de biochimie et biologie cellulaire\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"450-454\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian journal of biochemistry and cell biology = Revue canadienne de biochimie et biologie cellulaire\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/bcb-2016-0163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of biochemistry and cell biology = Revue canadienne de biochimie et biologie cellulaire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/bcb-2016-0163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

伤口愈合划痕试验是一种常用的描述细胞迁移的方法,细胞迁移在发育、组织修复和免疫应答等过程中都是一个重要的生物学过程。然而,伤口愈合率的测量在不同的研究中有所不同。在这里,我们将这些测量方法归纳为三种类型:(I)直接速率平均值;(二)回归率平均值;(3)平均距离回归速率。以中国仓鼠卵巢(CHO)细胞为模型,比较了三种分析方法对伤口愈合率的量化结果,发现I型和III型分析方法对异常值的抗性更强,II型分析方法对异常值的敏感性更强。我们希望这项研究可以帮助研究人员更好地利用这种简单而有效的检测方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Method comparison for analyzing wound healing rates.
Wound healing scratch assay is a frequently used method to characterize cell migration, which is an important biological process in the course of development, tissue repair, and immune response for example. The measurement of wound healing rate, however, varies among different studies. Here we summarized these measurements into three types: (I) direct rate average; (II) regression rate average; and (III) average distance regression rate. Using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells as a model, we compared the three types of analyses on quantifying the wound closing rate, and discovered that type I & III measurements are more resistant to outliers, and type II analysis is more sensitive to outliers. We hope this study can help researchers to better use this simple yet effective assay.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信