欧洲人权法院与国有实体:法学的参与与发展

IF 0.5 Q3 LAW
Mihaela-Maria Barnes
{"title":"欧洲人权法院与国有实体:法学的参与与发展","authors":"Mihaela-Maria Barnes","doi":"10.1163/15718034-12341478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe article analyses the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) concerning State-owned entities (SOE s) in the following areas: standing, the criteria for determining the nature and status of an entity, the positive obligations of States in the context of SOE s, the attribution of acts and omissions of SOE s to the State for the purpose of State responsibility, the liability of States for the debts of SOE s and the obligations of the State to promptly enforce decisions against SOE s. The aim of the article is to uncover the main issues that the ECtHR has had to consider when dealing with SOE s: whether the approach taken by the Court is consistent over time; whether and where applicable the Court’s approach is consistent with, or departs from, general international law; and what are the main principles that can be ascertained from this case law.","PeriodicalId":42613,"journal":{"name":"Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The European Court of Human Rights and State-Owned Entities: Engagement and Development of a Jurisprudence Constante\",\"authors\":\"Mihaela-Maria Barnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718034-12341478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe article analyses the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) concerning State-owned entities (SOE s) in the following areas: standing, the criteria for determining the nature and status of an entity, the positive obligations of States in the context of SOE s, the attribution of acts and omissions of SOE s to the State for the purpose of State responsibility, the liability of States for the debts of SOE s and the obligations of the State to promptly enforce decisions against SOE s. The aim of the article is to uncover the main issues that the ECtHR has had to consider when dealing with SOE s: whether the approach taken by the Court is consistent over time; whether and where applicable the Court’s approach is consistent with, or departs from, general international law; and what are the main principles that can be ascertained from this case law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341478\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从以下几个方面分析了欧洲人权法院(ECtHR)关于国有实体的判例:地位、确定一个实体的性质和地位的标准、国家在国有企业方面的积极义务、为了国家责任的目的将国有企业的行为和不作为归之于国家、国家对国有企业债务的责任以及国家迅速执行针对国有企业的决定的义务。这篇文章的目的是揭示欧洲人权法院在处理国有企业时必须考虑的主要问题:法院采取的方法是否始终一致;法院的做法是否以及在适用的情况下是否符合或背离一般国际法;从这一判例法中可以确定的主要原则是什么?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The European Court of Human Rights and State-Owned Entities: Engagement and Development of a Jurisprudence Constante
The article analyses the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) concerning State-owned entities (SOE s) in the following areas: standing, the criteria for determining the nature and status of an entity, the positive obligations of States in the context of SOE s, the attribution of acts and omissions of SOE s to the State for the purpose of State responsibility, the liability of States for the debts of SOE s and the obligations of the State to promptly enforce decisions against SOE s. The aim of the article is to uncover the main issues that the ECtHR has had to consider when dealing with SOE s: whether the approach taken by the Court is consistent over time; whether and where applicable the Court’s approach is consistent with, or departs from, general international law; and what are the main principles that can be ascertained from this case law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
40.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals is firmly established as the leading journal in its field. Each issue will give you the latest developments with respect to the preparation, adoption, suspension, amendment and revision of Rules of Procedure as well as statutory and internal rules and other related matters. The Journal will also provide you with the latest practice with respect to the interpretation and application of rules of procedure and constitutional documents, which can be found in judgments, advisory opinions, written and oral pleadings as well as legal literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信