大流行期间的教育连续性:对智利隔离学校教学管理的挑战

Q3 Social Sciences
D. Cuéllar, D. Guzmán, C. Lizama, M. Faúndez
{"title":"大流行期间的教育连续性:对智利隔离学校教学管理的挑战","authors":"D. Cuéllar, D. Guzmán, C. Lizama, M. Faúndez","doi":"10.18820/2519593x/pie.v39.i1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 outbreak has created an uncertain scenario for educational systems, leading many countries to deploy unprecedented remote learning programmes. Chilean schools have not been the exception and have thus developed and put in place several actions to uphold effective pedagogical management (PM) and continuity of learning; however, as we emphasise in this paper, the Chilean educational system is highly segregated. PM encompasses actions and decisions aimed at safeguarding quality education by focusing on four domains: technological, curricular, methodological and assessment. This descriptive and exploratory quantitative study seeks to explore the challenges facing PM, as perceived by actors working in Chile’s three different administrative and financial school governance systems in the framework of remote education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings highlight the disparities among actors belonging to the three types of administrative and financial governance systems regarding the perceived challenges facing PM. Thus, publicly funded schools face greater challenges in practically all four PM domains as compared to private schools. The main differences among schools revolve around the technological and assessment domains. While the technological domain is more of a concern for public schools, the assessment domain presents more challenges for private schools. Beyond the schools´ administrative and financial governance system, an important finding was the scant importance attached to the curriculum as a challenging issue as well as an excessive focus on the methodological domain, indicative of a prevailing logic of efficiency as applied to the learning process. challenges facing pedagogical management, as perceived by educational actors in Chilean schools during the pandemic. We explore the differences and similarities between schools within the different administrative and financial governance systems. These findings are indicative of challenges and opportunities to achieve a reflective and situated process of educational continuity within the national educational context.","PeriodicalId":19864,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Education","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational continuity during the pandemic: Challenges to pedagogical management in segregated Chilean schools\",\"authors\":\"D. Cuéllar, D. Guzmán, C. Lizama, M. Faúndez\",\"doi\":\"10.18820/2519593x/pie.v39.i1.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The COVID-19 outbreak has created an uncertain scenario for educational systems, leading many countries to deploy unprecedented remote learning programmes. Chilean schools have not been the exception and have thus developed and put in place several actions to uphold effective pedagogical management (PM) and continuity of learning; however, as we emphasise in this paper, the Chilean educational system is highly segregated. PM encompasses actions and decisions aimed at safeguarding quality education by focusing on four domains: technological, curricular, methodological and assessment. This descriptive and exploratory quantitative study seeks to explore the challenges facing PM, as perceived by actors working in Chile’s three different administrative and financial school governance systems in the framework of remote education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings highlight the disparities among actors belonging to the three types of administrative and financial governance systems regarding the perceived challenges facing PM. Thus, publicly funded schools face greater challenges in practically all four PM domains as compared to private schools. The main differences among schools revolve around the technological and assessment domains. While the technological domain is more of a concern for public schools, the assessment domain presents more challenges for private schools. Beyond the schools´ administrative and financial governance system, an important finding was the scant importance attached to the curriculum as a challenging issue as well as an excessive focus on the methodological domain, indicative of a prevailing logic of efficiency as applied to the learning process. challenges facing pedagogical management, as perceived by educational actors in Chilean schools during the pandemic. We explore the differences and similarities between schools within the different administrative and financial governance systems. These findings are indicative of challenges and opportunities to achieve a reflective and situated process of educational continuity within the national educational context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives in Education\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593x/pie.v39.i1.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593x/pie.v39.i1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

2019冠状病毒病疫情给教育系统造成了不确定的局面,导致许多国家部署了前所未有的远程学习计划。智利的学校也不例外,因此制定并实施了若干行动,以维护有效的教学管理(PM)和学习的连续性;然而,正如我们在本文中强调的那样,智利的教育制度是高度隔离的。项目管理包括旨在通过关注四个领域来保障优质教育的行动和决策:技术、课程、方法和评估。这项描述性和探索性定量研究旨在探讨在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,在智利三种不同行政和金融学校治理体系中工作的行为者所认为的远程教育框架下,总理面临的挑战。我们的研究结果突出了三种类型的行政和财务治理系统的参与者之间的差异,这些差异涉及到项目管理面临的感知挑战。因此,与私立学校相比,公立学校在几乎所有四个PM领域都面临着更大的挑战。学校之间的主要差异在于技术和评估领域。虽然技术领域是公立学校更关心的问题,但评估领域对私立学校提出了更多的挑战。除了学校的行政和财务管理系统之外,一个重要的发现是,作为一个具有挑战性的问题,对课程的重视程度不够,以及对方法领域的过度关注,表明了在学习过程中应用效率的普遍逻辑。大流行期间智利学校教育行为者所认识到的教学管理面临的挑战。我们探讨了不同行政和财务管理制度下学校之间的异同。这些调查结果表明,在国家教育范围内实现教育连续性的反思和定位过程面临着挑战和机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Educational continuity during the pandemic: Challenges to pedagogical management in segregated Chilean schools
The COVID-19 outbreak has created an uncertain scenario for educational systems, leading many countries to deploy unprecedented remote learning programmes. Chilean schools have not been the exception and have thus developed and put in place several actions to uphold effective pedagogical management (PM) and continuity of learning; however, as we emphasise in this paper, the Chilean educational system is highly segregated. PM encompasses actions and decisions aimed at safeguarding quality education by focusing on four domains: technological, curricular, methodological and assessment. This descriptive and exploratory quantitative study seeks to explore the challenges facing PM, as perceived by actors working in Chile’s three different administrative and financial school governance systems in the framework of remote education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings highlight the disparities among actors belonging to the three types of administrative and financial governance systems regarding the perceived challenges facing PM. Thus, publicly funded schools face greater challenges in practically all four PM domains as compared to private schools. The main differences among schools revolve around the technological and assessment domains. While the technological domain is more of a concern for public schools, the assessment domain presents more challenges for private schools. Beyond the schools´ administrative and financial governance system, an important finding was the scant importance attached to the curriculum as a challenging issue as well as an excessive focus on the methodological domain, indicative of a prevailing logic of efficiency as applied to the learning process. challenges facing pedagogical management, as perceived by educational actors in Chilean schools during the pandemic. We explore the differences and similarities between schools within the different administrative and financial governance systems. These findings are indicative of challenges and opportunities to achieve a reflective and situated process of educational continuity within the national educational context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives in Education
Perspectives in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Education is a professional, refereed journal, which encourages submission of previously unpublished articles on contemporary educational issues. As a journal that represents a variety of cross-disciplinary interests, both theoretical and practical, it seeks to stimulate debates on a wide range of topics. PIE invites manuscripts employing innovative qualitative and quantitative methods and approaches including (but not limited to) ethnographic observation and interviewing, grounded theory, life history, case study, curriculum analysis and critique, policy studies, ethnomethodology, social and educational critique, phenomenology, deconstruction, and genealogy. Debates on epistemology, methodology, or ethics, from a range of perspectives including postpositivism, interpretivism, constructivism, critical theory, feminism, post-modernism are also invited. PIE seeks to stimulate important dialogues and intellectual exchange on education and democratic transition with respect to schools, colleges, non-governmental organisations, universities and technikons in South Africa and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信