{"title":"论法律实践与其他国家法律认识的真实性标准","authors":"V. Kozhevnikov","doi":"10.33258/siasat.v7i2.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This scientific article analyzes various criteria for the truth of knowledge about the state and law. The work emphasizes a very important and fundamental position, according to which legal practice, being the most important criterion for knowledge about the state and law, cannot objectively be recognized as a single criterion, because far from all knowledge about many state-legal phenomena and processes cannot be \"measured\", based solely on legal practice.","PeriodicalId":31923,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Siasat Bisnis","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Legal Practice and Other Criteria for the Truth of Knowledge about the State and Law\",\"authors\":\"V. Kozhevnikov\",\"doi\":\"10.33258/siasat.v7i2.119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This scientific article analyzes various criteria for the truth of knowledge about the state and law. The work emphasizes a very important and fundamental position, according to which legal practice, being the most important criterion for knowledge about the state and law, cannot objectively be recognized as a single criterion, because far from all knowledge about many state-legal phenomena and processes cannot be \\\"measured\\\", based solely on legal practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Siasat Bisnis\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Siasat Bisnis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33258/siasat.v7i2.119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Siasat Bisnis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33258/siasat.v7i2.119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
On Legal Practice and Other Criteria for the Truth of Knowledge about the State and Law
This scientific article analyzes various criteria for the truth of knowledge about the state and law. The work emphasizes a very important and fundamental position, according to which legal practice, being the most important criterion for knowledge about the state and law, cannot objectively be recognized as a single criterion, because far from all knowledge about many state-legal phenomena and processes cannot be "measured", based solely on legal practice.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
