共同决策(SDM)在稳定型心绞痛治疗中的临床应用及疗效分析

Q3 Engineering
Hao-min Cheng, H. Hsu, Chih-Yi Lee, H. Chang, H. Huang, Mei-Jyh Sheu, Hsiao-Hui Chiu
{"title":"共同决策(SDM)在稳定型心绞痛治疗中的临床应用及疗效分析","authors":"Hao-min Cheng, H. Hsu, Chih-Yi Lee, H. Chang, H. Huang, Mei-Jyh Sheu, Hsiao-Hui Chiu","doi":"10.20849/ijsn.v5i2.751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Cardiac disease is the second leading causes of death in Taiwan in 2018 and coronary artery disease is one of the main reasons. Aims: The purpose of this study was to estimate whether Shared decision making (SDM) could lower the anxiety of the patient in the treatment of cardiac catheterization and improve the intension of medical decision or not. Methods: One-group pretest-posttest design.Using the public medical aids opinion questionnaire that was developed by the Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare. STROBE guidelines have been adhered to in the reporting of this study. Results: The anxiety level decrease after the SDM from 3.5 to 2.1 points (p-value<0.05) and the proportions of the intension to choose medication and surgery increase from 34% to 66%. Results show that SDM has positive influence in the relief of anxiety. Conclusion: SDM has positive influence in lowering patient’s anxiety and improve the intension of medical decision, the hesitation of patient and deficiency of time are two of the main barriers during the application process.","PeriodicalId":39544,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Security and Networks","volume":"37 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Application and Efficiency Analysis of Shared Decision Making (SDM) in the Treatment of Stable Angina\",\"authors\":\"Hao-min Cheng, H. Hsu, Chih-Yi Lee, H. Chang, H. Huang, Mei-Jyh Sheu, Hsiao-Hui Chiu\",\"doi\":\"10.20849/ijsn.v5i2.751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background : Cardiac disease is the second leading causes of death in Taiwan in 2018 and coronary artery disease is one of the main reasons. Aims: The purpose of this study was to estimate whether Shared decision making (SDM) could lower the anxiety of the patient in the treatment of cardiac catheterization and improve the intension of medical decision or not. Methods: One-group pretest-posttest design.Using the public medical aids opinion questionnaire that was developed by the Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare. STROBE guidelines have been adhered to in the reporting of this study. Results: The anxiety level decrease after the SDM from 3.5 to 2.1 points (p-value<0.05) and the proportions of the intension to choose medication and surgery increase from 34% to 66%. Results show that SDM has positive influence in the relief of anxiety. Conclusion: SDM has positive influence in lowering patient’s anxiety and improve the intension of medical decision, the hesitation of patient and deficiency of time are two of the main barriers during the application process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Security and Networks\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Security and Networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20849/ijsn.v5i2.751\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Security and Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20849/ijsn.v5i2.751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:心脏疾病是2018年台湾第二大死亡原因,冠状动脉疾病是主要原因之一。目的:本研究的目的是评估共同决策(Shared decision making, SDM)是否能降低心导管治疗中患者的焦虑情绪,提高医疗决策的强度。方法:单组前测后测设计。采用台湾卫生福利部编制的公众医疗辅助工具意见问卷。本研究报告遵循STROBE指南。结果:SDM后焦虑水平由3.5分下降至2.1分(p值<0.05),选择药物和手术的意向比例由34%上升至66%。结果表明,SDM对焦虑的缓解有积极的影响。结论:SDM在降低患者焦虑、提高医疗决策强度方面具有积极作用,患者的犹豫和时间不足是应用SDM的主要障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Application and Efficiency Analysis of Shared Decision Making (SDM) in the Treatment of Stable Angina
Background : Cardiac disease is the second leading causes of death in Taiwan in 2018 and coronary artery disease is one of the main reasons. Aims: The purpose of this study was to estimate whether Shared decision making (SDM) could lower the anxiety of the patient in the treatment of cardiac catheterization and improve the intension of medical decision or not. Methods: One-group pretest-posttest design.Using the public medical aids opinion questionnaire that was developed by the Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare. STROBE guidelines have been adhered to in the reporting of this study. Results: The anxiety level decrease after the SDM from 3.5 to 2.1 points (p-value<0.05) and the proportions of the intension to choose medication and surgery increase from 34% to 66%. Results show that SDM has positive influence in the relief of anxiety. Conclusion: SDM has positive influence in lowering patient’s anxiety and improve the intension of medical decision, the hesitation of patient and deficiency of time are two of the main barriers during the application process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Security and Networks
International Journal of Security and Networks Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: IJSN proposes and fosters discussion on and dissemination of network security related issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信