测试前皮质醇水平预测短Synacthen测试结果:一项回顾性分析

IF 2.7 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
R. Ravindran, J. Carter, Asit Kumar, Florin Capatana, I. Khan, M. Adlan, L. Premawardhana
{"title":"测试前皮质醇水平预测短Synacthen测试结果:一项回顾性分析","authors":"R. Ravindran, J. Carter, Asit Kumar, Florin Capatana, I. Khan, M. Adlan, L. Premawardhana","doi":"10.1177/11795514221093316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Short Synacthen tests (SSTs) are expensive, dependent on Synacthen availability, and need supervision. To reduce SST testing, we examined the utility of pre-test cortisol (Cort0) and related parameters in predicting outcome. Design and Measurements: We retrospectively examined the following in all SSTs; (i) Cort0 (ii) indications (iii) and time and place of testing. Receiver operated characteristic (ROC) curves were devised for Cort0 to obtain the best cut-off for outcome prediction in those who had SSTs between 8 and 10 am (Group 1) and at other times (Group 2). Results: Of 506 SSTs, 13 were unsuitable for analysis. 111/493 SSTs (22.5%) were abnormal. (1) ROC curves predicted – (a) SST failure with 100% specificity when Cort0 was ⩽124 nmol/L (Group 1), or ⩽47 (Group 2); (b) a normal SST with 100% sensitivity when Cort0 ⩾314 nmol/L (Group 1) and ⩾323 nmol/L (Group 2). (2) There was significant correlation between Cort0 and 30-minute cortisol (rs = 0.65-0.78, P  < .001). (3) Median Cort0 was lower in those who failed SSTs compared to those who passed (147 vs 298 nmol/L respectively, P  < .001). (4) SST failure was commoner in Group 1 vs 2 (P = .001). (5) There was no difference in outcome between out-patient and inpatient SSTs. (6) SST failure was most common for ‘steroid related’ indications (39.6%, P  < .001). Conclusions: This study indicates that (1) Cort0 ⩾ 323 (Group1) and ⩾314 nmol/L (Group 2) predicted a normal SST with 100% sensitivity; (2) Using these cut offs 141/493 (28.6%) tests may have been avoided; (3) supporting evidence should be considered in those with a lower pre-test predictability of failure.","PeriodicalId":44715,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Endocrinology and Diabetes","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-test Cortisol Levels in Predicting Short Synacthen Test Outcome: A Retrospective Analysis\",\"authors\":\"R. Ravindran, J. Carter, Asit Kumar, Florin Capatana, I. Khan, M. Adlan, L. Premawardhana\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11795514221093316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Short Synacthen tests (SSTs) are expensive, dependent on Synacthen availability, and need supervision. To reduce SST testing, we examined the utility of pre-test cortisol (Cort0) and related parameters in predicting outcome. Design and Measurements: We retrospectively examined the following in all SSTs; (i) Cort0 (ii) indications (iii) and time and place of testing. Receiver operated characteristic (ROC) curves were devised for Cort0 to obtain the best cut-off for outcome prediction in those who had SSTs between 8 and 10 am (Group 1) and at other times (Group 2). Results: Of 506 SSTs, 13 were unsuitable for analysis. 111/493 SSTs (22.5%) were abnormal. (1) ROC curves predicted – (a) SST failure with 100% specificity when Cort0 was ⩽124 nmol/L (Group 1), or ⩽47 (Group 2); (b) a normal SST with 100% sensitivity when Cort0 ⩾314 nmol/L (Group 1) and ⩾323 nmol/L (Group 2). (2) There was significant correlation between Cort0 and 30-minute cortisol (rs = 0.65-0.78, P  < .001). (3) Median Cort0 was lower in those who failed SSTs compared to those who passed (147 vs 298 nmol/L respectively, P  < .001). (4) SST failure was commoner in Group 1 vs 2 (P = .001). (5) There was no difference in outcome between out-patient and inpatient SSTs. (6) SST failure was most common for ‘steroid related’ indications (39.6%, P  < .001). Conclusions: This study indicates that (1) Cort0 ⩾ 323 (Group1) and ⩾314 nmol/L (Group 2) predicted a normal SST with 100% sensitivity; (2) Using these cut offs 141/493 (28.6%) tests may have been avoided; (3) supporting evidence should be considered in those with a lower pre-test predictability of failure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights-Endocrinology and Diabetes\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights-Endocrinology and Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795514221093316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Endocrinology and Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795514221093316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:短时Synacthen试验(SSTs)价格昂贵,依赖于Synacthen的可用性,并且需要监督。为了减少SST测试,我们检查了测试前皮质醇(Cort0)和相关参数在预测结果中的效用。设计和测量:我们在所有sst中回顾性检查了以下情况;(i) Cort0 (ii)适应症(iii)及测试时间和地点。设计受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,以便在上午8点至10点(第1组)和其他时间(第2组)发生SSTs的患者中获得预测结果的最佳截止点。结果:506例SSTs中,13例不适合分析。111/493例SSTs异常(22.5%)。(1) ROC曲线预测- (a)当Cort0≥124 nmol/L(第1组)或≥47 nmol/L(第2组)时,SST失效的特异性为100%;(b)当Cort0小于314 nmol/L(第1组)和小于323 nmol/L(第2组)时,具有100%敏感性的正常SST。(2)Cort0和30分钟皮质醇之间存在显著相关性(rs = 0.65-0.78, P < .001)。(3) SSTs未通过组的中位Cort0低于通过组(147 nmol/L vs 298 nmol/L, P < 0.001)。(4)第1组与第2组的SST失败更为常见(P = .001)。(5)门诊与住院SSTs的预后无差异。(6) SST失败在“类固醇相关”适应症中最常见(39.6%,P < 0.001)。结论:该研究表明(1)Cort0小于323(第1组)和小于314 nmol/L(第2组)以100%的敏感性预测正常的SST;(2)使用这些截止值141/493(28.6%)试验是可以避免的;(3)试验前失败可预见性较低的应考虑辅助证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pre-test Cortisol Levels in Predicting Short Synacthen Test Outcome: A Retrospective Analysis
Objective: Short Synacthen tests (SSTs) are expensive, dependent on Synacthen availability, and need supervision. To reduce SST testing, we examined the utility of pre-test cortisol (Cort0) and related parameters in predicting outcome. Design and Measurements: We retrospectively examined the following in all SSTs; (i) Cort0 (ii) indications (iii) and time and place of testing. Receiver operated characteristic (ROC) curves were devised for Cort0 to obtain the best cut-off for outcome prediction in those who had SSTs between 8 and 10 am (Group 1) and at other times (Group 2). Results: Of 506 SSTs, 13 were unsuitable for analysis. 111/493 SSTs (22.5%) were abnormal. (1) ROC curves predicted – (a) SST failure with 100% specificity when Cort0 was ⩽124 nmol/L (Group 1), or ⩽47 (Group 2); (b) a normal SST with 100% sensitivity when Cort0 ⩾314 nmol/L (Group 1) and ⩾323 nmol/L (Group 2). (2) There was significant correlation between Cort0 and 30-minute cortisol (rs = 0.65-0.78, P  < .001). (3) Median Cort0 was lower in those who failed SSTs compared to those who passed (147 vs 298 nmol/L respectively, P  < .001). (4) SST failure was commoner in Group 1 vs 2 (P = .001). (5) There was no difference in outcome between out-patient and inpatient SSTs. (6) SST failure was most common for ‘steroid related’ indications (39.6%, P  < .001). Conclusions: This study indicates that (1) Cort0 ⩾ 323 (Group1) and ⩾314 nmol/L (Group 2) predicted a normal SST with 100% sensitivity; (2) Using these cut offs 141/493 (28.6%) tests may have been avoided; (3) supporting evidence should be considered in those with a lower pre-test predictability of failure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信