{"title":"TCEC14计算机国际象棋超级决赛:一个视角","authors":"M. Sadler","doi":"10.3233/icg-190116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a time when the pace of life is ever increasing and attention spans are ever decreasing, it seems strange that a chess match played between two machines at a long time control should prove so gripping, but the TCEC, LEELA CHESS ZERO and STOCKFISH managed it! The final score of 53.5-46.5, 14 wins to 7, was I think a fair reflection of the relative strength of both engines in a head-to-head contest: STOCKFISH seemed on the back foot more often than LEELA. Watching STOCKFISH hold the worse side of yet another 100-move draw with a long rear-guard action, I suddenly thought back to one of the key moments of the recent Carlsen-Caruana world championship match.","PeriodicalId":14829,"journal":{"name":"J. Int. Comput. Games Assoc.","volume":"35 1","pages":"152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The TCEC14 computer chess superfinal: A perspective\",\"authors\":\"M. Sadler\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/icg-190116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a time when the pace of life is ever increasing and attention spans are ever decreasing, it seems strange that a chess match played between two machines at a long time control should prove so gripping, but the TCEC, LEELA CHESS ZERO and STOCKFISH managed it! The final score of 53.5-46.5, 14 wins to 7, was I think a fair reflection of the relative strength of both engines in a head-to-head contest: STOCKFISH seemed on the back foot more often than LEELA. Watching STOCKFISH hold the worse side of yet another 100-move draw with a long rear-guard action, I suddenly thought back to one of the key moments of the recent Carlsen-Caruana world championship match.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Int. Comput. Games Assoc.\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Int. Comput. Games Assoc.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/icg-190116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Int. Comput. Games Assoc.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/icg-190116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The TCEC14 computer chess superfinal: A perspective
In a time when the pace of life is ever increasing and attention spans are ever decreasing, it seems strange that a chess match played between two machines at a long time control should prove so gripping, but the TCEC, LEELA CHESS ZERO and STOCKFISH managed it! The final score of 53.5-46.5, 14 wins to 7, was I think a fair reflection of the relative strength of both engines in a head-to-head contest: STOCKFISH seemed on the back foot more often than LEELA. Watching STOCKFISH hold the worse side of yet another 100-move draw with a long rear-guard action, I suddenly thought back to one of the key moments of the recent Carlsen-Caruana world championship match.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
