异丙酚和咪达唑仑脊髓麻醉用于选择性脐下手术时的镇静唤醒时间

Purabi Bardhan, M. Mannan, A. Malik, Sreekanta Chandra Banik
{"title":"异丙酚和咪达唑仑脊髓麻醉用于选择性脐下手术时的镇静唤醒时间","authors":"Purabi Bardhan, M. Mannan, A. Malik, Sreekanta Chandra Banik","doi":"10.3329/cmoshmcj.v21i2.63089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Arousal time is variable after sedation with spinal anesthesia after infraumbilical surgeries. Propofol and midazolam have been studied individually using the Observer’s Assessment of Awareness/Sedation (OAA/S) score and different other ways. So this present study was designed to compare the arousal time of sedation for propofol and midazolam using OAA/S scores. \nMaterials and methods: A total of 60 patients were randomly assigned to receive either propofol (Group A, n =30) or midazolam (Group B, n = 30). All patients of Group A received bolus of propofol (1 mg/kg) followed by infusion at 3 mg/kg/h, Group B received bolus of midazolam (0.05 mg/kg), followed by infusion at 0.06 mg/kg/h. OAA/S score was noted at beginning and again during recovery. The time to achieve OAA/S score 5 was noted. Changes of pulse rate, O2 saturation and satisfaction score were noted. \nResults: Among the 60 patients gender distributions where male and female distributed evenly. Age group distributions revealed more patients were gathered in age group 31- 40 years and >51 years. Regarding physical status most of the patients were at ASA physical status 1. It was found that propofol had better outcome than midazolam in terms of arousal time score and patient’s satisfaction score after surgery. \nConclusions: A shorter arousal time from sedation during spinal anaesthesia can be achieved using propofol than arousal time with midazolam. \nChatt Maa Shi Hosp Med Coll J; Vol.21 (2); July 2022; Page 18-21","PeriodicalId":9788,"journal":{"name":"Chattagram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital Medical College Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arousal Time from Sedation during Spinal Anaesthesia Given with Propofol and Midazolam for Elective Infraumbilical Surgeries\",\"authors\":\"Purabi Bardhan, M. Mannan, A. Malik, Sreekanta Chandra Banik\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/cmoshmcj.v21i2.63089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Arousal time is variable after sedation with spinal anesthesia after infraumbilical surgeries. Propofol and midazolam have been studied individually using the Observer’s Assessment of Awareness/Sedation (OAA/S) score and different other ways. So this present study was designed to compare the arousal time of sedation for propofol and midazolam using OAA/S scores. \\nMaterials and methods: A total of 60 patients were randomly assigned to receive either propofol (Group A, n =30) or midazolam (Group B, n = 30). All patients of Group A received bolus of propofol (1 mg/kg) followed by infusion at 3 mg/kg/h, Group B received bolus of midazolam (0.05 mg/kg), followed by infusion at 0.06 mg/kg/h. OAA/S score was noted at beginning and again during recovery. The time to achieve OAA/S score 5 was noted. Changes of pulse rate, O2 saturation and satisfaction score were noted. \\nResults: Among the 60 patients gender distributions where male and female distributed evenly. Age group distributions revealed more patients were gathered in age group 31- 40 years and >51 years. Regarding physical status most of the patients were at ASA physical status 1. It was found that propofol had better outcome than midazolam in terms of arousal time score and patient’s satisfaction score after surgery. \\nConclusions: A shorter arousal time from sedation during spinal anaesthesia can be achieved using propofol than arousal time with midazolam. \\nChatt Maa Shi Hosp Med Coll J; Vol.21 (2); July 2022; Page 18-21\",\"PeriodicalId\":9788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chattagram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital Medical College Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chattagram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital Medical College Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/cmoshmcj.v21i2.63089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chattagram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital Medical College Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/cmoshmcj.v21i2.63089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脐下手术后脊髓麻醉镇静后的觉醒时间是可变的。异丙酚和咪达唑仑分别使用观察者清醒/镇静评估(OAA/S)评分和不同的其他方法进行了研究。因此,本研究采用OAA/S评分比较异丙酚和咪达唑仑镇静唤醒时间。材料与方法:60例患者随机分为丙泊酚组(A组,n =30)和咪达唑仑组(B组,n =30)。A组患者给予异丙酚1 mg/kg,以3 mg/kg/h滴注;B组患者给予咪达唑仑0.05 mg/kg,以0.06 mg/kg/h滴注。在开始和恢复期间再次记录OAA/S评分。记录了达到OAA/S 5分的时间。观察脉搏率、血氧饱和度及满意度评分的变化。结果:60例患者性别分布中,男女分布均匀。年龄分布显示31 ~ 40岁和>51岁患者较多。在身体状态方面,大多数患者的身体状态为ASA 1。结果发现异丙酚在唤醒时间评分和术后患者满意度评分方面优于咪达唑仑。结论:与咪达唑仑相比,丙泊酚能缩短脊髓麻醉中镇静的唤醒时间。上海医科大学医学院;月,(2);2022年7月;第18 - 21页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Arousal Time from Sedation during Spinal Anaesthesia Given with Propofol and Midazolam for Elective Infraumbilical Surgeries
Background: Arousal time is variable after sedation with spinal anesthesia after infraumbilical surgeries. Propofol and midazolam have been studied individually using the Observer’s Assessment of Awareness/Sedation (OAA/S) score and different other ways. So this present study was designed to compare the arousal time of sedation for propofol and midazolam using OAA/S scores. Materials and methods: A total of 60 patients were randomly assigned to receive either propofol (Group A, n =30) or midazolam (Group B, n = 30). All patients of Group A received bolus of propofol (1 mg/kg) followed by infusion at 3 mg/kg/h, Group B received bolus of midazolam (0.05 mg/kg), followed by infusion at 0.06 mg/kg/h. OAA/S score was noted at beginning and again during recovery. The time to achieve OAA/S score 5 was noted. Changes of pulse rate, O2 saturation and satisfaction score were noted. Results: Among the 60 patients gender distributions where male and female distributed evenly. Age group distributions revealed more patients were gathered in age group 31- 40 years and >51 years. Regarding physical status most of the patients were at ASA physical status 1. It was found that propofol had better outcome than midazolam in terms of arousal time score and patient’s satisfaction score after surgery. Conclusions: A shorter arousal time from sedation during spinal anaesthesia can be achieved using propofol than arousal time with midazolam. Chatt Maa Shi Hosp Med Coll J; Vol.21 (2); July 2022; Page 18-21
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信