{"title":"历史解释中的直接回指。口头和书面话语的比较分析","authors":"Manuel Montanero, M. Salguero, Manuel Lucero","doi":"10.4067/s0718-09342022000200605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on the production of anaphoric devices in history teachers’ oral explanations in comparison with those in textbooks. First, a revision of the anaphora concept and its classification in the specialized literature is made. A synthesis is proposed integrating two criteria: the type of word and inference, associated to 6 types of anaphora. Second, from this classification a system of categories is constructed to compare anaphora production in a sample of 19 history texts. The results reveal a","PeriodicalId":44762,"journal":{"name":"Revista Signos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La anáfora directa en la explicaciones históricas. Un análisis comparativo entre el discurso oral y escrito\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Montanero, M. Salguero, Manuel Lucero\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0718-09342022000200605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study focuses on the production of anaphoric devices in history teachers’ oral explanations in comparison with those in textbooks. First, a revision of the anaphora concept and its classification in the specialized literature is made. A synthesis is proposed integrating two criteria: the type of word and inference, associated to 6 types of anaphora. Second, from this classification a system of categories is constructed to compare anaphora production in a sample of 19 history texts. The results reveal a\",\"PeriodicalId\":44762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Signos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Signos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-09342022000200605\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Signos","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-09342022000200605","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
La anáfora directa en la explicaciones históricas. Un análisis comparativo entre el discurso oral y escrito
This study focuses on the production of anaphoric devices in history teachers’ oral explanations in comparison with those in textbooks. First, a revision of the anaphora concept and its classification in the specialized literature is made. A synthesis is proposed integrating two criteria: the type of word and inference, associated to 6 types of anaphora. Second, from this classification a system of categories is constructed to compare anaphora production in a sample of 19 history texts. The results reveal a
期刊介绍:
Es una revista científica cuya misión es estimular y facilitar el intercambio académico entre investigadores de la comunidad científica internacional, publicando artículos originales de investigaciones científicas tanto teóricas como aplicadas en idioma español, inglés y portugués. Su enfoque disciplinar se concentra en el área de la lingüística y en el de algunas interdisciplinas: Psicolingüística, Lingüística del Texto y del Discurso, Lingüística Aplicada y Lingüística y Computación.