基于利益冲突的审稿人推荐新方法

Adi Setyo Nugroho, Aizul Faiz Iswafaza, R. Anggraini, R. Sarno
{"title":"基于利益冲突的审稿人推荐新方法","authors":"Adi Setyo Nugroho, Aizul Faiz Iswafaza, R. Anggraini, R. Sarno","doi":"10.1109/ICTS52701.2021.9609054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the reviewer's recommendation in accordance with the field of research is crucial where this is directly proportional to the results of the review on the research. In finding suitable reviewers, conflicts of interest (COI) are often found. In this paper, we propose an approach to reviewer recommendations with topic extraction and author extraction to prevent COI. First, we separate the process into 2, namely to do topic extraction using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), and also to do author extraction using Cosine Similarity. The next step is to combine the two results to rank the 10 recommended authors. The experimental results show that our approach has succeeded in getting 10 recommended reviewers to avoid COI.","PeriodicalId":6738,"journal":{"name":"2021 13th International Conference on Information & Communication Technology and System (ICTS)","volume":"5 1","pages":"195-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel Approach on Conducting Reviewer Recommendations Based on Conflict of Interest\",\"authors\":\"Adi Setyo Nugroho, Aizul Faiz Iswafaza, R. Anggraini, R. Sarno\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICTS52701.2021.9609054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"the reviewer's recommendation in accordance with the field of research is crucial where this is directly proportional to the results of the review on the research. In finding suitable reviewers, conflicts of interest (COI) are often found. In this paper, we propose an approach to reviewer recommendations with topic extraction and author extraction to prevent COI. First, we separate the process into 2, namely to do topic extraction using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), and also to do author extraction using Cosine Similarity. The next step is to combine the two results to rank the 10 recommended authors. The experimental results show that our approach has succeeded in getting 10 recommended reviewers to avoid COI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 13th International Conference on Information & Communication Technology and System (ICTS)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"195-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 13th International Conference on Information & Communication Technology and System (ICTS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTS52701.2021.9609054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 13th International Conference on Information & Communication Technology and System (ICTS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTS52701.2021.9609054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

审稿人根据研究领域的建议是至关重要的,因为这与研究的审查结果直接成正比。在寻找合适的审稿人时,经常会发现利益冲突(COI)。在本文中,我们提出了一种通过主题提取和作者提取来防止COI的审稿人推荐方法。首先,我们将这个过程分成2部分,即使用潜在狄利克雷分配(Latent Dirichlet Allocation, LDA)进行主题提取,以及使用余弦相似性进行作者提取。下一步是将这两个结果结合起来对10位被推荐的作者进行排名。实验结果表明,我们的方法成功地获得了10个推荐审稿人,避免了COI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Novel Approach on Conducting Reviewer Recommendations Based on Conflict of Interest
the reviewer's recommendation in accordance with the field of research is crucial where this is directly proportional to the results of the review on the research. In finding suitable reviewers, conflicts of interest (COI) are often found. In this paper, we propose an approach to reviewer recommendations with topic extraction and author extraction to prevent COI. First, we separate the process into 2, namely to do topic extraction using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), and also to do author extraction using Cosine Similarity. The next step is to combine the two results to rank the 10 recommended authors. The experimental results show that our approach has succeeded in getting 10 recommended reviewers to avoid COI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信