清朝误入歧途的外交政策与统治朝鲜的斗争(根据俄罗斯档案)

IF 0.3 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Larisa Zabrovskaia
{"title":"清朝误入歧途的外交政策与统治朝鲜的斗争(根据俄罗斯档案)","authors":"Larisa Zabrovskaia","doi":"10.1353/ks.2020.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Studying unpublished documents from the Russian archive provides new information on the Sino-Japanese rivalry over Korea at the end of the nineteenth century, a very complicated period in the modern history of Korea. These documents help researchers understand Qing China’s relations with Korea and analyze Chinese methods for preserving control of the country. Rivalry over Korea occurred against the backdrop of military and economic expansion of the European powers, which further complicated China’s position as a suzerain of Korea. The main milestones in the political dialogue between Qing China and Japan are discussed with a focus on specific Sino-Korean interactions. Qing authorities attempted to consolidate China’s control over Korea by deploying the ancient Chinese diplomatic practice of “using barbarians to control [other] barbarians.” Transferring this archaic method of maintaining political power into the modern environment of capitalist state expansion in eastern Asia failed. Qing China’s loss of control over Korea was the logical result of instituting this erroneous policy. Russian documents reporting China’s dialogue with Japan demonstrate that Qing China prioritized preserving traditional forms of contact with Korea, whereas Japan favored opening Korea to economic expansion.","PeriodicalId":43382,"journal":{"name":"Korean Studies","volume":"34 1","pages":"80 - 96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qing China’s Misguided Foreign Policy and the Struggle to Dominate Korea (According to the Russian Archive)\",\"authors\":\"Larisa Zabrovskaia\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ks.2020.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Studying unpublished documents from the Russian archive provides new information on the Sino-Japanese rivalry over Korea at the end of the nineteenth century, a very complicated period in the modern history of Korea. These documents help researchers understand Qing China’s relations with Korea and analyze Chinese methods for preserving control of the country. Rivalry over Korea occurred against the backdrop of military and economic expansion of the European powers, which further complicated China’s position as a suzerain of Korea. The main milestones in the political dialogue between Qing China and Japan are discussed with a focus on specific Sino-Korean interactions. Qing authorities attempted to consolidate China’s control over Korea by deploying the ancient Chinese diplomatic practice of “using barbarians to control [other] barbarians.” Transferring this archaic method of maintaining political power into the modern environment of capitalist state expansion in eastern Asia failed. Qing China’s loss of control over Korea was the logical result of instituting this erroneous policy. Russian documents reporting China’s dialogue with Japan demonstrate that Qing China prioritized preserving traditional forms of contact with Korea, whereas Japan favored opening Korea to economic expansion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Studies\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"80 - 96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ks.2020.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ks.2020.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:对俄罗斯档案中未公开的文献进行研究,为了解19世纪末朝鲜近代史上一个非常复杂的时期中日对朝鲜的争夺提供了新的信息。这些文件有助于研究人员了解清朝中国与朝鲜的关系,并分析中国保持对国家控制的方法。在欧洲列强军事和经济扩张的背景下,对朝鲜的争夺进一步复杂化了中国作为朝鲜宗主国的地位。清代中国和日本之间政治对话的主要里程碑被讨论,重点是具体的中韩互动。清朝当局试图利用中国古代的外交实践“以夷制夷”来巩固中国对朝鲜的控制。将这种古老的维持政治权力的方法转移到资本主义国家在东亚扩张的现代环境中失败了。清朝失去对朝鲜的控制是实行这一错误政策的必然结果。报道中国与日本对话的俄罗斯文件表明,清朝优先考虑保留与朝鲜的传统接触形式,而日本则倾向于开放朝鲜以进行经济扩张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Qing China’s Misguided Foreign Policy and the Struggle to Dominate Korea (According to the Russian Archive)
Abstract:Studying unpublished documents from the Russian archive provides new information on the Sino-Japanese rivalry over Korea at the end of the nineteenth century, a very complicated period in the modern history of Korea. These documents help researchers understand Qing China’s relations with Korea and analyze Chinese methods for preserving control of the country. Rivalry over Korea occurred against the backdrop of military and economic expansion of the European powers, which further complicated China’s position as a suzerain of Korea. The main milestones in the political dialogue between Qing China and Japan are discussed with a focus on specific Sino-Korean interactions. Qing authorities attempted to consolidate China’s control over Korea by deploying the ancient Chinese diplomatic practice of “using barbarians to control [other] barbarians.” Transferring this archaic method of maintaining political power into the modern environment of capitalist state expansion in eastern Asia failed. Qing China’s loss of control over Korea was the logical result of instituting this erroneous policy. Russian documents reporting China’s dialogue with Japan demonstrate that Qing China prioritized preserving traditional forms of contact with Korea, whereas Japan favored opening Korea to economic expansion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Studies
Korean Studies ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信