现在你不知道了

IF 0.1 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
I Tatti Studies Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.1086/713501
Eileen Reeves
{"title":"现在你不知道了","authors":"Eileen Reeves","doi":"10.1086/713501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“IF PAINTERS WERE OBLIGED TO WHITEWASH entire scenes every time slight flaws in a finger or an eye were pointed out to them, the whole story would be very slow to emerge.” So wrote Galileo Galilei in 1624, conceding in the interest of preserving the grand structure of the heliocentric world system a small error on the part of Nicolas Copernicus. The comparison, typical in its artsy, aggressive tenor, involves what Galileo depicted as a trivial aspect of the orbit of Venus. This letter, however, was largely concerned with another issue, parallax, the variation in the apparent position of an object viewed from different perspective points. Now you see it, and now you don’t: the positional shift that is parallax only appears under certain conditions, and its value as a quantitative index of the size of the cosmos or of the distance of its components was a fluctuating one. Galileo sought to establish and to use this measurement over the course of his career; that story, more than any other account of his research agendas, is filled with gaps and obvious erasures. Rather than the specter of the bare, ruined wall to which","PeriodicalId":42173,"journal":{"name":"I Tatti Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"And Now You Don’t\",\"authors\":\"Eileen Reeves\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/713501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“IF PAINTERS WERE OBLIGED TO WHITEWASH entire scenes every time slight flaws in a finger or an eye were pointed out to them, the whole story would be very slow to emerge.” So wrote Galileo Galilei in 1624, conceding in the interest of preserving the grand structure of the heliocentric world system a small error on the part of Nicolas Copernicus. The comparison, typical in its artsy, aggressive tenor, involves what Galileo depicted as a trivial aspect of the orbit of Venus. This letter, however, was largely concerned with another issue, parallax, the variation in the apparent position of an object viewed from different perspective points. Now you see it, and now you don’t: the positional shift that is parallax only appears under certain conditions, and its value as a quantitative index of the size of the cosmos or of the distance of its components was a fluctuating one. Galileo sought to establish and to use this measurement over the course of his career; that story, more than any other account of his research agendas, is filled with gaps and obvious erasures. Rather than the specter of the bare, ruined wall to which\",\"PeriodicalId\":42173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"I Tatti Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"I Tatti Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/713501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I Tatti Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/713501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“如果每次有人向画家指出手指或眼睛上的细微瑕疵时,他们都不得不粉刷整个场景,那么整个故事将会非常缓慢地呈现出来。”伽利略在1624年这样写道,为了维护日心说世界体系的宏伟结构,他承认了尼古拉斯·哥白尼的一个小错误。这种比较,以其典型的艺术、挑衅的口吻,涉及到伽利略所描述的金星轨道的一个微不足道的方面。然而,这封信主要关注的是另一个问题,视差,即从不同角度观察物体的明显位置的变化。现在你看到了,现在你看不见了:视差的位置移动只在某些条件下出现,它作为宇宙大小或其组成部分距离的定量指标的价值是波动的。伽利略在他的职业生涯中试图建立并使用这种测量方法;这个故事,比其他任何关于他的研究议程的描述都要多,充满了空白和明显的抹去。而不是那光秃秃的破墙的幽灵
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
And Now You Don’t
“IF PAINTERS WERE OBLIGED TO WHITEWASH entire scenes every time slight flaws in a finger or an eye were pointed out to them, the whole story would be very slow to emerge.” So wrote Galileo Galilei in 1624, conceding in the interest of preserving the grand structure of the heliocentric world system a small error on the part of Nicolas Copernicus. The comparison, typical in its artsy, aggressive tenor, involves what Galileo depicted as a trivial aspect of the orbit of Venus. This letter, however, was largely concerned with another issue, parallax, the variation in the apparent position of an object viewed from different perspective points. Now you see it, and now you don’t: the positional shift that is parallax only appears under certain conditions, and its value as a quantitative index of the size of the cosmos or of the distance of its components was a fluctuating one. Galileo sought to establish and to use this measurement over the course of his career; that story, more than any other account of his research agendas, is filled with gaps and obvious erasures. Rather than the specter of the bare, ruined wall to which
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
I Tatti Studies
I Tatti Studies MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信