集会与代表性主张之间的密切关系:来自坦桑尼亚的证据

IF 0.6 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Dan Paget
{"title":"集会与代表性主张之间的密切关系:来自坦桑尼亚的证据","authors":"Dan Paget","doi":"10.1080/14662043.2023.2235158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Studies analyse what politicians communicate at rallies. Yet most do so to determine what politicians communicate at large. Therefore, they implicitly assume that what they communicate at rallies is what they communicate across media. I ask: what is particular to the meanings that politicians, and indeed audience members, make at rallies? I theorise the rally as a media genre, in which those present are simplified into two entities (“speakers”; and “audience”) and those entities engage in an asymmetric, interactive dialogue. I argue that these two features of rally genre facilitate, but do not necessitate, the making of representative claims. I analyse “speaker”-“audience” discourse at rallies in Tanzania. I find that politicians use their speech to make representative claims and craft dialogues with “audience” which induce them to co-declare those claims. Therefore, I find that there is an affinity between the rally and representative claim-making.","PeriodicalId":46038,"journal":{"name":"COMMONWEALTH & COMPARATIVE POLITICS","volume":"101 1","pages":"376 - 398"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The affinity between the rally and representative claim-making: evidence from Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"Dan Paget\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14662043.2023.2235158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Studies analyse what politicians communicate at rallies. Yet most do so to determine what politicians communicate at large. Therefore, they implicitly assume that what they communicate at rallies is what they communicate across media. I ask: what is particular to the meanings that politicians, and indeed audience members, make at rallies? I theorise the rally as a media genre, in which those present are simplified into two entities (“speakers”; and “audience”) and those entities engage in an asymmetric, interactive dialogue. I argue that these two features of rally genre facilitate, but do not necessitate, the making of representative claims. I analyse “speaker”-“audience” discourse at rallies in Tanzania. I find that politicians use their speech to make representative claims and craft dialogues with “audience” which induce them to co-declare those claims. Therefore, I find that there is an affinity between the rally and representative claim-making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COMMONWEALTH & COMPARATIVE POLITICS\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"376 - 398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COMMONWEALTH & COMPARATIVE POLITICS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2023.2235158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMMONWEALTH & COMPARATIVE POLITICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2023.2235158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

研究分析了政治家在集会上的交流内容。然而,大多数人这样做是为了确定政客们的总体沟通内容。因此,他们含蓄地认为,他们在集会上传达的信息就是他们在媒体上传达的信息。我的问题是:政客和听众在集会上表达的意思有什么特别之处?我将集会理论化为一种媒体类型,在场的人被简化为两个实体(“演讲者”;和“观众”),这些实体参与了一种不对称的互动对话。我认为,这两个特点,集会类型促进,但不是必要的,代表性的主张。我分析了坦桑尼亚集会上“演讲者”-“听众”的话语。我发现政客们用他们的演讲来发表有代表性的主张,并精心设计与“观众”的对话,诱导他们共同宣布这些主张。因此,我发现这次集会和代表诉求之间有一种亲切感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The affinity between the rally and representative claim-making: evidence from Tanzania
ABSTRACT Studies analyse what politicians communicate at rallies. Yet most do so to determine what politicians communicate at large. Therefore, they implicitly assume that what they communicate at rallies is what they communicate across media. I ask: what is particular to the meanings that politicians, and indeed audience members, make at rallies? I theorise the rally as a media genre, in which those present are simplified into two entities (“speakers”; and “audience”) and those entities engage in an asymmetric, interactive dialogue. I argue that these two features of rally genre facilitate, but do not necessitate, the making of representative claims. I analyse “speaker”-“audience” discourse at rallies in Tanzania. I find that politicians use their speech to make representative claims and craft dialogues with “audience” which induce them to co-declare those claims. Therefore, I find that there is an affinity between the rally and representative claim-making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Long established as the leading publication in its field, the journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics contains scholarly articles which both report original research on the politics of Commonwealth countries and relate their findings to issues of general significance for students of comparative politics. The journal also publishes work on the politics of other states where such work is of interest for comparative politics generally or where it enables comparisons to be made with Commonwealth countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信