{"title":"自动裂变径迹计数系统的相互比较","authors":"Dariush Azimi-Garakani","doi":"10.1016/0167-5087(84)91343-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The methods of counting fission tracks by two image analyzing computers and a spark counting system are compared with a standard microscopy technique. In this comparison, for automatic fission track counting, the two commercially available image analyzer instruments, the Quantimet 720 and the Leitz-Texture Analyzing System (TAS) and a specially designed spark counter, the UTASC system, have been used. The results showed that the relative counting efficiencies of the Quantimet 720, the Leitz-TAS and the UTASC system are 0.974±0.010, 0.988±0.013 and 0.955±0.010, respectively</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100972,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research","volume":"225 1","pages":"Pages 101-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0167-5087(84)91343-7","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intercomparison of automatic fission track counting systems\",\"authors\":\"Dariush Azimi-Garakani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0167-5087(84)91343-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The methods of counting fission tracks by two image analyzing computers and a spark counting system are compared with a standard microscopy technique. In this comparison, for automatic fission track counting, the two commercially available image analyzer instruments, the Quantimet 720 and the Leitz-Texture Analyzing System (TAS) and a specially designed spark counter, the UTASC system, have been used. The results showed that the relative counting efficiencies of the Quantimet 720, the Leitz-TAS and the UTASC system are 0.974±0.010, 0.988±0.013 and 0.955±0.010, respectively</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research\",\"volume\":\"225 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 101-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0167-5087(84)91343-7\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167508784913437\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167508784913437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
摘要
用两台图像分析计算机和一个火花计数系统来计数裂变径迹的方法与标准显微镜技术进行了比较。在这个比较中,对于自动裂变径迹计数,使用了两种市售的图像分析仪器,Quantimet 720和Leitz-Texture analysis System (TAS)和一个专门设计的火花计数器,UTASC系统。结果表明,Quantimet 720、Leitz-TAS和UTASC系统的相对计数效率分别为0.974±0.010、0.988±0.013和0.955±0.010
Intercomparison of automatic fission track counting systems
The methods of counting fission tracks by two image analyzing computers and a spark counting system are compared with a standard microscopy technique. In this comparison, for automatic fission track counting, the two commercially available image analyzer instruments, the Quantimet 720 and the Leitz-Texture Analyzing System (TAS) and a specially designed spark counter, the UTASC system, have been used. The results showed that the relative counting efficiencies of the Quantimet 720, the Leitz-TAS and the UTASC system are 0.974±0.010, 0.988±0.013 and 0.955±0.010, respectively