斯拉夫语中非重音长度和短新锐音的反思,Štokavian/Čakavian中thekȍkōt型拉长等问题

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Rasprave Pub Date : 2022-07-29 DOI:10.31724/rihjj.48.1.4
M. Kapović
{"title":"斯拉夫语中非重音长度和短新锐音的反思,Štokavian/Čakavian中thekȍkōt型拉长等问题","authors":"M. Kapović","doi":"10.31724/rihjj.48.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is the sixth instalment in the discussion between Frederik Kortlandt and the author of this article on several problems of historical Slavic accentology. The paper discusses the reflection of pre- and posttonic length (in accentual paradigm a and c) in Western South Slavic and West Slavic, the reflection of the short neo-acute in Kajkavian and Czech, and the kȍkōt ‘rooster’ type lengthening in accentual paradigm c in Štokavian and Čakavian. A few other topics are also shortly discussed – such as the accent of the genitive plural, the *obőrna ‘defence’ type accent, and the Čakavian črnĩna ‘blackness’ and dvorĩšće ‘courtyard’ type accent. Additionally, the paper deals with some issues concerning Kortlandt’s rather problematic methodology, rhetorics, discussion and presentation style.","PeriodicalId":51986,"journal":{"name":"Rasprave","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On\\nthe Reflection of Unaccented Length and the Short Neo-Acute in Slavic, the\\nkȍkōt Type Lengthening in Štokavian/Čakavian and Other Issues\",\"authors\":\"M. Kapović\",\"doi\":\"10.31724/rihjj.48.1.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is the sixth instalment in the discussion between Frederik Kortlandt and the author of this article on several problems of historical Slavic accentology. The paper discusses the reflection of pre- and posttonic length (in accentual paradigm a and c) in Western South Slavic and West Slavic, the reflection of the short neo-acute in Kajkavian and Czech, and the kȍkōt ‘rooster’ type lengthening in accentual paradigm c in Štokavian and Čakavian. A few other topics are also shortly discussed – such as the accent of the genitive plural, the *obőrna ‘defence’ type accent, and the Čakavian črnĩna ‘blackness’ and dvorĩšće ‘courtyard’ type accent. Additionally, the paper deals with some issues concerning Kortlandt’s rather problematic methodology, rhetorics, discussion and presentation style.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rasprave\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rasprave\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31724/rihjj.48.1.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rasprave","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31724/rihjj.48.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是Frederik Kortlandt和本文作者之间关于历史上斯拉夫口音的几个问题的讨论的第六部分。本文讨论了西部南斯拉夫语和西斯拉夫语中前音和后音长度(在口音范式a和c中)的反映,卡伊卡维亚语和捷克语中短的新尖锐音的反映,以及Štokavian和Čakavian中口音范式c中kȍkōt“公鸡”型拉长。其他一些话题也被简短地讨论了一下——比如复数格的口音,*obőrna“防御”型口音,Čakavian črnĩna“黑”和dvorĩšće“庭院”型口音。此外,本文还讨论了有关科特兰颇有问题的方法论、修辞学、讨论和演讲风格的一些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Reflection of Unaccented Length and the Short Neo-Acute in Slavic, the kȍkōt Type Lengthening in Štokavian/Čakavian and Other Issues
This is the sixth instalment in the discussion between Frederik Kortlandt and the author of this article on several problems of historical Slavic accentology. The paper discusses the reflection of pre- and posttonic length (in accentual paradigm a and c) in Western South Slavic and West Slavic, the reflection of the short neo-acute in Kajkavian and Czech, and the kȍkōt ‘rooster’ type lengthening in accentual paradigm c in Štokavian and Čakavian. A few other topics are also shortly discussed – such as the accent of the genitive plural, the *obőrna ‘defence’ type accent, and the Čakavian črnĩna ‘blackness’ and dvorĩšće ‘courtyard’ type accent. Additionally, the paper deals with some issues concerning Kortlandt’s rather problematic methodology, rhetorics, discussion and presentation style.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rasprave
Rasprave LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
50.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信