R中用于元分析的元包和元包的对比

C. Lortie
{"title":"R中用于元分析的元包和元包的对比","authors":"C. Lortie","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.27608v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is extensive support and choice in R to support meta-analyses. Two common packages in the natural sciences include meta and metafor. Here, a brief contrast of the strengths of each is described for the synthesis scientist. Meta is a direct, intuitive choice for rapid implementation of general meta-analytical statistics. Metafor is a comprehensive package for analyses if the fit models are more complex. Both packages provide estimates of heterogeneity, excellent visualization tools, and functions to explore publication bias. Preference and critical outcomes can facilitate choice between these two specific options. Nonetheless, metafor has a steeper learning curve but greater rewards.","PeriodicalId":93040,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ preprints","volume":"9 1","pages":"e27608"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A contrast of meta and metafor packages for meta-analyses in R\",\"authors\":\"C. Lortie\",\"doi\":\"10.7287/peerj.preprints.27608v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is extensive support and choice in R to support meta-analyses. Two common packages in the natural sciences include meta and metafor. Here, a brief contrast of the strengths of each is described for the synthesis scientist. Meta is a direct, intuitive choice for rapid implementation of general meta-analytical statistics. Metafor is a comprehensive package for analyses if the fit models are more complex. Both packages provide estimates of heterogeneity, excellent visualization tools, and functions to explore publication bias. Preference and critical outcomes can facilitate choice between these two specific options. Nonetheless, metafor has a steeper learning curve but greater rewards.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PeerJ preprints\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"e27608\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PeerJ preprints\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27608v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ preprints","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27608v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

在R中有广泛的支持和选择来支持元分析。自然科学中两个常见的包包括meta和metafor。在这里,为合成科学家描述了每种力量的简要对比。Meta是一个直接的,直观的选择,用于快速实现一般的元分析统计。如果拟合模型比较复杂,metfor是一个全面的分析包。这两个软件包都提供了异质性估计、优秀的可视化工具和探索发表偏倚的功能。偏好和关键结果可以促进这两个特定选项之间的选择。尽管如此,元计算的学习曲线更陡峭,但回报也更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A contrast of meta and metafor packages for meta-analyses in R
There is extensive support and choice in R to support meta-analyses. Two common packages in the natural sciences include meta and metafor. Here, a brief contrast of the strengths of each is described for the synthesis scientist. Meta is a direct, intuitive choice for rapid implementation of general meta-analytical statistics. Metafor is a comprehensive package for analyses if the fit models are more complex. Both packages provide estimates of heterogeneity, excellent visualization tools, and functions to explore publication bias. Preference and critical outcomes can facilitate choice between these two specific options. Nonetheless, metafor has a steeper learning curve but greater rewards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信