金加仑(Ribes Aureum Pursh.)的生长发育和产量依栽培制度

Q4 Multidisciplinary
K. Kampuss, Daina Šarkovska
{"title":"金加仑(Ribes Aureum Pursh.)的生长发育和产量依栽培制度","authors":"K. Kampuss, Daina Šarkovska","doi":"10.2478/prolas-2022-0082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although golden currant has been grown in Latvia for several decades, mainly as ornamental plant, there is little experience on the most suitable cultivation systems for berry production. Two cultivars of golden currant — ‘Laila’ and ‘Uzbekistanskaya Krupnoplodnaya’, were planted in 2017 in two cultivation systems — vertical trellis and shrub form and assessed in the first two seasons with harvest. In addition, plots with and without organic mulch were established in the shrub system. The aim of the study was to investigate the growth, development and yield of golden currant depending on the cultivation system. All plants bloomed abundantly and practically at the same time in both years, while no significant differences were found between cultivation systems and cultivars. The annual growth of shoots in 2020 was significantly affected by the cultivation system — on average 0.66 m in the trellis system, 0.41 m in the shrub system in mulched plots, and 0.43 m in unmulched plots. Cultivar ‘Laila’ tended to produce longer shoots (average 0.51 m) than the ‘Uzbekistanskaya Krupnoplodnaya’ (average 0.47 m). The yield was low because of poor fruit set and did not significantly differ between cultivar and cultivation systems, though cultivar ‘Laila’ and shrub systems still had higher yields.","PeriodicalId":20651,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Growth, Development and Yield of Golden Currant (Ribes Aureum Pursh.) Depending on Cultivation System\",\"authors\":\"K. Kampuss, Daina Šarkovska\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/prolas-2022-0082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Although golden currant has been grown in Latvia for several decades, mainly as ornamental plant, there is little experience on the most suitable cultivation systems for berry production. Two cultivars of golden currant — ‘Laila’ and ‘Uzbekistanskaya Krupnoplodnaya’, were planted in 2017 in two cultivation systems — vertical trellis and shrub form and assessed in the first two seasons with harvest. In addition, plots with and without organic mulch were established in the shrub system. The aim of the study was to investigate the growth, development and yield of golden currant depending on the cultivation system. All plants bloomed abundantly and practically at the same time in both years, while no significant differences were found between cultivation systems and cultivars. The annual growth of shoots in 2020 was significantly affected by the cultivation system — on average 0.66 m in the trellis system, 0.41 m in the shrub system in mulched plots, and 0.43 m in unmulched plots. Cultivar ‘Laila’ tended to produce longer shoots (average 0.51 m) than the ‘Uzbekistanskaya Krupnoplodnaya’ (average 0.47 m). The yield was low because of poor fruit set and did not significantly differ between cultivar and cultivation systems, though cultivar ‘Laila’ and shrub systems still had higher yields.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences.\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/prolas-2022-0082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/prolas-2022-0082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然金醋栗在拉脱维亚已经种植了几十年,主要作为观赏植物,但很少有最适合浆果生产的栽培系统的经验。2017年,两种金加仑品种“Laila”和“Uzbekistanskaya Krupnoplodnaya”在两种种植系统(垂直棚架和灌木形式)中种植,并在前两个收获季节进行了评估。此外,在灌丛系统中建立了有有机地膜和无有机地膜的样地。本研究旨在探讨不同栽培制度对金醋栗生长发育及产量的影响。所有植物在两年中几乎同时开花,而栽培系统和品种之间没有显着差异。2020年苗木年生长量受栽培制度影响显著,覆盖地棚架制苗木年平均生长量为0.66 m,灌木制苗木年平均生长量为0.41 m,未覆盖地苗木年平均生长量为0.43 m。“莱拉”品种的茎长(平均0.51 m)高于“乌孜克斯坦卡亚”(平均0.47 m),由于坐果差,产量较低,但栽培体系和灌丛体系的产量差异不显著,但“莱拉”品种和灌丛体系的产量仍较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Growth, Development and Yield of Golden Currant (Ribes Aureum Pursh.) Depending on Cultivation System
Abstract Although golden currant has been grown in Latvia for several decades, mainly as ornamental plant, there is little experience on the most suitable cultivation systems for berry production. Two cultivars of golden currant — ‘Laila’ and ‘Uzbekistanskaya Krupnoplodnaya’, were planted in 2017 in two cultivation systems — vertical trellis and shrub form and assessed in the first two seasons with harvest. In addition, plots with and without organic mulch were established in the shrub system. The aim of the study was to investigate the growth, development and yield of golden currant depending on the cultivation system. All plants bloomed abundantly and practically at the same time in both years, while no significant differences were found between cultivation systems and cultivars. The annual growth of shoots in 2020 was significantly affected by the cultivation system — on average 0.66 m in the trellis system, 0.41 m in the shrub system in mulched plots, and 0.43 m in unmulched plots. Cultivar ‘Laila’ tended to produce longer shoots (average 0.51 m) than the ‘Uzbekistanskaya Krupnoplodnaya’ (average 0.47 m). The yield was low because of poor fruit set and did not significantly differ between cultivar and cultivation systems, though cultivar ‘Laila’ and shrub systems still had higher yields.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信