“空间即服务”:写字楼租金的溢价?

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
S. Tsolacos, Stephen Lee, H. Tse
{"title":"“空间即服务”:写字楼租金的溢价?","authors":"S. Tsolacos, Stephen Lee, H. Tse","doi":"10.1108/jerer-10-2021-0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to examine the impact of “space-as-a-service” (SAAS) provision on office rents in the UK and quantify premia to office rents.Design/methodology/approachUsing hedonic modelling techniques the authors are able to quantify the impact of a number of SAAS features on office rents in the City of London using CoStar data. The authors control for the quality of the buildings by focussing on five-star buildings, rated by CoStar, as these buildings are more likely to incorporate SAAS features.FindingsUsing data on 317 transactions in 37 City of London Office buildings over the period 1 November 2004–15 July 2020, the authors find that tenant exclusive mobile applications (MAPPS) and a public terrace or rooftop command a rent premium of around £13 and £6.5 per sq. ft per annum, respectively. However, other SAAS features such as conferencing facilities, on-site fitness centre and touch down space have no significant impact on office rents. The impact of exclusive MAPPS varies with size of net lettable area.Research limitations/implicationsThe SAAS real estate model is an emerging trend in the office market. As it grows in importance more research questions will have to be investigated. The present study raises awareness of the need to specify SAAS features and form a rating system that will facilitate future research on the subject.Practical implicationsThe conclusion from the present investigation is that only two SAAS features have a positive impact on office (tenant exclusive mobile apps and a public terrace or rooftop), which suggest that these two features may form the basis of any future SAAS rating system. These two SAAS components should carry more weight in valuations and pricing.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that attempts to quantify the impact of SAAS features on office rents.","PeriodicalId":44570,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Real Estate Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Space-as-a-service’: A premium to office rents?\",\"authors\":\"S. Tsolacos, Stephen Lee, H. Tse\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jerer-10-2021-0049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis study aims to examine the impact of “space-as-a-service” (SAAS) provision on office rents in the UK and quantify premia to office rents.Design/methodology/approachUsing hedonic modelling techniques the authors are able to quantify the impact of a number of SAAS features on office rents in the City of London using CoStar data. The authors control for the quality of the buildings by focussing on five-star buildings, rated by CoStar, as these buildings are more likely to incorporate SAAS features.FindingsUsing data on 317 transactions in 37 City of London Office buildings over the period 1 November 2004–15 July 2020, the authors find that tenant exclusive mobile applications (MAPPS) and a public terrace or rooftop command a rent premium of around £13 and £6.5 per sq. ft per annum, respectively. However, other SAAS features such as conferencing facilities, on-site fitness centre and touch down space have no significant impact on office rents. The impact of exclusive MAPPS varies with size of net lettable area.Research limitations/implicationsThe SAAS real estate model is an emerging trend in the office market. As it grows in importance more research questions will have to be investigated. The present study raises awareness of the need to specify SAAS features and form a rating system that will facilitate future research on the subject.Practical implicationsThe conclusion from the present investigation is that only two SAAS features have a positive impact on office (tenant exclusive mobile apps and a public terrace or rooftop), which suggest that these two features may form the basis of any future SAAS rating system. These two SAAS components should carry more weight in valuations and pricing.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that attempts to quantify the impact of SAAS features on office rents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of European Real Estate Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of European Real Estate Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jerer-10-2021-0049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Real Estate Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jerer-10-2021-0049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在考察“空间即服务”(SAAS)规定对英国办公室租金的影响,并量化办公室租金的溢价。设计/方法/方法使用享乐建模技术,作者能够使用CoStar数据量化许多SAAS功能对伦敦金融城办公室租金的影响。作者通过关注由CoStar评级的五星级建筑来控制建筑的质量,因为这些建筑更有可能包含SAAS功能。作者使用了2004年11月1日至2020年7月15日期间伦敦37座写字楼的317笔交易的数据,发现租户专用移动应用程序(MAPPS)和公共露台或屋顶的租金溢价约为每平方米13英镑和6.5英镑。每年分别为100英镑。然而,其他SAAS功能,如会议设施、现场健身中心和着陆空间,对办公室租金没有显著影响。独家MAPPS的影响随净可出租面积的大小而变化。研究局限/启示SAAS房地产模式是办公市场的新兴趋势。随着它的重要性的增长,更多的研究问题将不得不进行调查。本研究提高了人们对明确SAAS特征和形成评级系统的必要性的认识,这将有助于未来对该主题的研究。从目前的调查中得出的结论是,只有两个SAAS功能对办公室有积极影响(租户专用移动应用程序和公共露台或屋顶),这表明这两个功能可能构成任何未来SAAS评级系统的基础。这两个SAAS组件应该在估值和定价中占有更大的权重。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一个试图量化SAAS功能对办公室租金影响的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Space-as-a-service’: A premium to office rents?
PurposeThis study aims to examine the impact of “space-as-a-service” (SAAS) provision on office rents in the UK and quantify premia to office rents.Design/methodology/approachUsing hedonic modelling techniques the authors are able to quantify the impact of a number of SAAS features on office rents in the City of London using CoStar data. The authors control for the quality of the buildings by focussing on five-star buildings, rated by CoStar, as these buildings are more likely to incorporate SAAS features.FindingsUsing data on 317 transactions in 37 City of London Office buildings over the period 1 November 2004–15 July 2020, the authors find that tenant exclusive mobile applications (MAPPS) and a public terrace or rooftop command a rent premium of around £13 and £6.5 per sq. ft per annum, respectively. However, other SAAS features such as conferencing facilities, on-site fitness centre and touch down space have no significant impact on office rents. The impact of exclusive MAPPS varies with size of net lettable area.Research limitations/implicationsThe SAAS real estate model is an emerging trend in the office market. As it grows in importance more research questions will have to be investigated. The present study raises awareness of the need to specify SAAS features and form a rating system that will facilitate future research on the subject.Practical implicationsThe conclusion from the present investigation is that only two SAAS features have a positive impact on office (tenant exclusive mobile apps and a public terrace or rooftop), which suggest that these two features may form the basis of any future SAAS rating system. These two SAAS components should carry more weight in valuations and pricing.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that attempts to quantify the impact of SAAS features on office rents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信