应对模式的概念:认知人变量与实际应对行为的关系

Heinz Walter Krohne
{"title":"应对模式的概念:认知人变量与实际应对行为的关系","authors":"Heinz Walter Krohne","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(89)90027-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the first section, a model of “coping modes” is presented which distinguishes two main classes of coping strategies: vigilance and cognitive avoidance. Vigilance is characterized by an approach to and an intensified processing of threat-relevant information. Its general purpose is to gain control over the main threat-related aspects of a situation, thereby protecting the individual from the perception of threat which would result from the confrontation with unexpected dangers. Cognitive avoidance is viewed as a withdrawal from threat-relevant information. Its general purpose is to reduce the arousal engendered by the confrontation with an aversive event. Both terms are employed to describe actual stress-related actions and cognitive operations as well as interindividual differences in the dispositional inclination toward a certain class of strategies. The second section introduces an instrument for the separate assessment of vigilant and avoidant coping. Finally, a study which demonstrates the predictive power of this instrument is reported. This study analyzes the influence of dispositional and actual vigilant and avoidant coping strategies on self-reported and biochemical stress indicators as evidenced by patients facing a surgical operation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"11 4","pages":"Pages 235-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(89)90027-1","citationCount":"176","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The concept of coping modes: Relating cognitive person variables to actual coping behavior\",\"authors\":\"Heinz Walter Krohne\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0146-6402(89)90027-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the first section, a model of “coping modes” is presented which distinguishes two main classes of coping strategies: vigilance and cognitive avoidance. Vigilance is characterized by an approach to and an intensified processing of threat-relevant information. Its general purpose is to gain control over the main threat-related aspects of a situation, thereby protecting the individual from the perception of threat which would result from the confrontation with unexpected dangers. Cognitive avoidance is viewed as a withdrawal from threat-relevant information. Its general purpose is to reduce the arousal engendered by the confrontation with an aversive event. Both terms are employed to describe actual stress-related actions and cognitive operations as well as interindividual differences in the dispositional inclination toward a certain class of strategies. The second section introduces an instrument for the separate assessment of vigilant and avoidant coping. Finally, a study which demonstrates the predictive power of this instrument is reported. This study analyzes the influence of dispositional and actual vigilant and avoidant coping strategies on self-reported and biochemical stress indicators as evidenced by patients facing a surgical operation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 235-248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(89)90027-1\",\"citationCount\":\"176\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0146640289900271\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0146640289900271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 176

摘要

在第一部分中,提出了一个“应对模式”模型,该模型区分了两类主要的应对策略:警惕和认知回避。警惕性的特点是对威胁相关信息的处理和强化处理。它的一般目的是控制局势中与威胁有关的主要方面,从而保护个人免受因与意外危险对抗而产生的威胁感。认知回避被认为是对威胁相关信息的回避。它的一般目的是减少与厌恶事件的对抗所产生的唤醒。这两个术语都被用来描述实际的与压力相关的行为和认知操作,以及个体间对某一类策略的倾向差异。第二部分介绍了警惕和回避应对的单独评估工具。最后,对该仪器的预测能力进行了研究。本研究以面临外科手术的患者为研究对象,分析了性格性应对策略和实际警惕回避应对策略对自我报告和生化应激指标的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The concept of coping modes: Relating cognitive person variables to actual coping behavior

In the first section, a model of “coping modes” is presented which distinguishes two main classes of coping strategies: vigilance and cognitive avoidance. Vigilance is characterized by an approach to and an intensified processing of threat-relevant information. Its general purpose is to gain control over the main threat-related aspects of a situation, thereby protecting the individual from the perception of threat which would result from the confrontation with unexpected dangers. Cognitive avoidance is viewed as a withdrawal from threat-relevant information. Its general purpose is to reduce the arousal engendered by the confrontation with an aversive event. Both terms are employed to describe actual stress-related actions and cognitive operations as well as interindividual differences in the dispositional inclination toward a certain class of strategies. The second section introduces an instrument for the separate assessment of vigilant and avoidant coping. Finally, a study which demonstrates the predictive power of this instrument is reported. This study analyzes the influence of dispositional and actual vigilant and avoidant coping strategies on self-reported and biochemical stress indicators as evidenced by patients facing a surgical operation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信