黄连固定提取物挥发性成分、细胞毒活性及抗氧化活性的研究

S. G. Lima, J. Figuerêdo, Marcelo Costa dos Santos, A. Meneses, M. Rocha, José G. M. Costa, R. M. Fernandes
{"title":"黄连固定提取物挥发性成分、细胞毒活性及抗氧化活性的研究","authors":"S. G. Lima, J. Figuerêdo, Marcelo Costa dos Santos, A. Meneses, M. Rocha, José G. M. Costa, R. M. Fernandes","doi":"10.9734/bpi/caprd/v2/12858d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Copaibas (Leguminosae - Caesalpinoideae) are native to the tropical region of Latin America and also West Africa. Their stem barks are used in folk medicine as a cicatrizing, anti-inflammatory, antiseptic, and antitumor agent. Thus, a phytochemical investigation of both the qualitative and quantitative chemical composition of the volatile and fixed constituents of the leaves, and bark of the Copaifera luetzelburgii stem is necessary and evaluated for their cytotoxicity, antioxidant potential and total phenol content. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the chemical composition of the volatile constituents, the cytotoxic activity, and the antioxidant potential against DPPH and ABTS radicals of C. luetzelburgii Harms, widely distributed in the Quilombola Community, municipality of Sao Miguel do Tapuio, State of Piaui, Brazil. The volatile constituents were extracted by the hydrodistillation method and analyzed by GC-MS. The ethanolic stem extract (EECC) was also analyzed by LC-ESI-TOF-MS. The phytochemical screening of the leaf and stem bark extracts (SBE) was performed, with the SBE showing more promising results. \nWhile germacrene D (27.12%), \\(\\beta\\)-caryophilylene (16.43%), and germacrene B (12.58%) were found to be the major constituents in the essential oil from leaves (EOL); \\(\\gamma\\)-selinene (26.79%), 7-epi-\\(\\alpha\\)-selinene (24.73%) and \\(\\beta\\)-selinene (14.63%) were the major constituents in the oil of the stem bark. Toxicity evaluation was performed in Artemia salina with results considered inactive (LC50 >1000\\(\\mu\\)g mL-1). The EECC showed the best of total phenols contents 31.41 ± 3.07, as, for antioxidant activity performed against the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH) with CE50 value = 40.11 ± 2.31, while the ethanolic extract of copaiba leaves (EEFC) with CE50 value = 74.13 ± 6.05, all ready for the test 2,2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) EECC showed better potential compared to EEFC. Thus, we hope that this work can contribute significantly to new research related to the species in phytochemistry and pharmacology.","PeriodicalId":10848,"journal":{"name":"Current Aspects in Pharmaceutical Research and Development Vol. 2","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on Volatile Constituents, Cytotoxic Activity and Antioxidant Potential of Fixed Extracts of Copaifera luetzelburgii Harms\",\"authors\":\"S. G. Lima, J. Figuerêdo, Marcelo Costa dos Santos, A. Meneses, M. Rocha, José G. M. Costa, R. M. Fernandes\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/bpi/caprd/v2/12858d\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Copaibas (Leguminosae - Caesalpinoideae) are native to the tropical region of Latin America and also West Africa. Their stem barks are used in folk medicine as a cicatrizing, anti-inflammatory, antiseptic, and antitumor agent. Thus, a phytochemical investigation of both the qualitative and quantitative chemical composition of the volatile and fixed constituents of the leaves, and bark of the Copaifera luetzelburgii stem is necessary and evaluated for their cytotoxicity, antioxidant potential and total phenol content. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the chemical composition of the volatile constituents, the cytotoxic activity, and the antioxidant potential against DPPH and ABTS radicals of C. luetzelburgii Harms, widely distributed in the Quilombola Community, municipality of Sao Miguel do Tapuio, State of Piaui, Brazil. The volatile constituents were extracted by the hydrodistillation method and analyzed by GC-MS. The ethanolic stem extract (EECC) was also analyzed by LC-ESI-TOF-MS. The phytochemical screening of the leaf and stem bark extracts (SBE) was performed, with the SBE showing more promising results. \\nWhile germacrene D (27.12%), \\\\(\\\\beta\\\\)-caryophilylene (16.43%), and germacrene B (12.58%) were found to be the major constituents in the essential oil from leaves (EOL); \\\\(\\\\gamma\\\\)-selinene (26.79%), 7-epi-\\\\(\\\\alpha\\\\)-selinene (24.73%) and \\\\(\\\\beta\\\\)-selinene (14.63%) were the major constituents in the oil of the stem bark. Toxicity evaluation was performed in Artemia salina with results considered inactive (LC50 >1000\\\\(\\\\mu\\\\)g mL-1). The EECC showed the best of total phenols contents 31.41 ± 3.07, as, for antioxidant activity performed against the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH) with CE50 value = 40.11 ± 2.31, while the ethanolic extract of copaiba leaves (EEFC) with CE50 value = 74.13 ± 6.05, all ready for the test 2,2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) EECC showed better potential compared to EEFC. Thus, we hope that this work can contribute significantly to new research related to the species in phytochemistry and pharmacology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Aspects in Pharmaceutical Research and Development Vol. 2\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Aspects in Pharmaceutical Research and Development Vol. 2\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/caprd/v2/12858d\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Aspects in Pharmaceutical Research and Development Vol. 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/caprd/v2/12858d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

麻豆属植物(豆科-麻豆科)原产于拉丁美洲和西非的热带地区。它们的茎皮在民间医学中用作消炎、消炎、防腐和抗肿瘤剂。因此,有必要对其叶片和树皮的挥发性成分和固定成分进行定性和定量的化学研究,并对其细胞毒性、抗氧化潜力和总酚含量进行评估。在本研究中,我们旨在评估广泛分布在巴西Piaui州Sao Miguel do Tapuio市Quilombola社区的C. luetzelburgii Harms的挥发性成分的化学成分,细胞毒活性以及抗DPPH和ABTS自由基的抗氧化潜力。采用水蒸气蒸馏法提取挥发性成分,GC-MS分析。采用LC-ESI-TOF-MS对乙醇提取物(EECC)进行分析。对叶和茎皮提取物(SBE)进行了植物化学筛选,SBE显示出更有希望的结果。germacrene D (27.12)%), \(\beta\)-caryophilylene (16.43%), and germacrene B (12.58%) were found to be the major constituents in the essential oil from leaves (EOL); \(\gamma\)-selinene (26.79%), 7-epi-\(\alpha\)-selinene (24.73%) and \(\beta\)-selinene (14.63%) were the major constituents in the oil of the stem bark. Toxicity evaluation was performed in Artemia salina with results considered inactive (LC50 >1000\(\mu\)g mL-1). The EECC showed the best of total phenols contents 31.41 ± 3.07, as, for antioxidant activity performed against the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH) with CE50 value = 40.11 ± 2.31, while the ethanolic extract of copaiba leaves (EEFC) with CE50 value = 74.13 ± 6.05, all ready for the test 2,2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) EECC showed better potential compared to EEFC. Thus, we hope that this work can contribute significantly to new research related to the species in phytochemistry and pharmacology.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study on Volatile Constituents, Cytotoxic Activity and Antioxidant Potential of Fixed Extracts of Copaifera luetzelburgii Harms
Copaibas (Leguminosae - Caesalpinoideae) are native to the tropical region of Latin America and also West Africa. Their stem barks are used in folk medicine as a cicatrizing, anti-inflammatory, antiseptic, and antitumor agent. Thus, a phytochemical investigation of both the qualitative and quantitative chemical composition of the volatile and fixed constituents of the leaves, and bark of the Copaifera luetzelburgii stem is necessary and evaluated for their cytotoxicity, antioxidant potential and total phenol content. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the chemical composition of the volatile constituents, the cytotoxic activity, and the antioxidant potential against DPPH and ABTS radicals of C. luetzelburgii Harms, widely distributed in the Quilombola Community, municipality of Sao Miguel do Tapuio, State of Piaui, Brazil. The volatile constituents were extracted by the hydrodistillation method and analyzed by GC-MS. The ethanolic stem extract (EECC) was also analyzed by LC-ESI-TOF-MS. The phytochemical screening of the leaf and stem bark extracts (SBE) was performed, with the SBE showing more promising results. While germacrene D (27.12%), \(\beta\)-caryophilylene (16.43%), and germacrene B (12.58%) were found to be the major constituents in the essential oil from leaves (EOL); \(\gamma\)-selinene (26.79%), 7-epi-\(\alpha\)-selinene (24.73%) and \(\beta\)-selinene (14.63%) were the major constituents in the oil of the stem bark. Toxicity evaluation was performed in Artemia salina with results considered inactive (LC50 >1000\(\mu\)g mL-1). The EECC showed the best of total phenols contents 31.41 ± 3.07, as, for antioxidant activity performed against the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH) with CE50 value = 40.11 ± 2.31, while the ethanolic extract of copaiba leaves (EEFC) with CE50 value = 74.13 ± 6.05, all ready for the test 2,2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) EECC showed better potential compared to EEFC. Thus, we hope that this work can contribute significantly to new research related to the species in phytochemistry and pharmacology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信