以法律确定性的名义?欧盟、中国和台湾地区关税分类制度预先裁定的比较

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Shu-Chien Chen
{"title":"以法律确定性的名义?欧盟、中国和台湾地区关税分类制度预先裁定的比较","authors":"Shu-Chien Chen","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2831508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many jurisdictions, international traders can apply to customs authorities for an advance ruling for tariff classification before they import or export their goods. The advance ruling system for tariff classification is expected to grant more legal certainty to international traders because they can communicate with customs authorities and receive a legally binding tariff classification decision in advance. Such a system is important in the facilitation of international trade. In this paper, the advance ruling systems for tariff classification in the European Union (EU), China and Taiwan will be compared. It is shown that the advance ruling systems for tariff classification in these three jurisdictions all emphasise the efficiency of customs administration more than the legitimate expectation and procedural rights of the applicants. This imbalance might result from the complicated nature of tariff classification; however, it can also make the advance ruling system less attractive for international traders to use.","PeriodicalId":38024,"journal":{"name":"World Customs Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In the Name of Legal Certainty? Comparison of Advance Ruling for Tariff Classification Systems in the European Union, China and Taiwan\",\"authors\":\"Shu-Chien Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2831508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In many jurisdictions, international traders can apply to customs authorities for an advance ruling for tariff classification before they import or export their goods. The advance ruling system for tariff classification is expected to grant more legal certainty to international traders because they can communicate with customs authorities and receive a legally binding tariff classification decision in advance. Such a system is important in the facilitation of international trade. In this paper, the advance ruling systems for tariff classification in the European Union (EU), China and Taiwan will be compared. It is shown that the advance ruling systems for tariff classification in these three jurisdictions all emphasise the efficiency of customs administration more than the legitimate expectation and procedural rights of the applicants. This imbalance might result from the complicated nature of tariff classification; however, it can also make the advance ruling system less attractive for international traders to use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Customs Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Customs Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2831508\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Customs Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2831508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在许多司法管辖区,国际贸易商可以在进口或出口货物之前向海关当局申请关税分类的预先裁定。关税分类预先裁定制度将为国际贸易商提供更多的法律确定性,因为他们可以与海关当局沟通,并提前获得具有法律约束力的关税分类决定。这种制度对促进国际贸易很重要。本文将对欧盟、中国大陆和台湾的关税分类预先裁决制度进行比较。研究表明,这三个司法管辖区的关税分类预先裁决制度都强调海关管理的效率,而不是申请人的合法期望和程序权利。这种不平衡可能是由于关税分类的复杂性造成的;然而,这也可能降低预先裁决系统对国际交易者的吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In the Name of Legal Certainty? Comparison of Advance Ruling for Tariff Classification Systems in the European Union, China and Taiwan
In many jurisdictions, international traders can apply to customs authorities for an advance ruling for tariff classification before they import or export their goods. The advance ruling system for tariff classification is expected to grant more legal certainty to international traders because they can communicate with customs authorities and receive a legally binding tariff classification decision in advance. Such a system is important in the facilitation of international trade. In this paper, the advance ruling systems for tariff classification in the European Union (EU), China and Taiwan will be compared. It is shown that the advance ruling systems for tariff classification in these three jurisdictions all emphasise the efficiency of customs administration more than the legitimate expectation and procedural rights of the applicants. This imbalance might result from the complicated nature of tariff classification; however, it can also make the advance ruling system less attractive for international traders to use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Customs Journal
World Customs Journal Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: The World Customs Journal is a peer-reviewed journal which provides a forum for customs professionals, academics, industry researchers, and research students to contribute items of interest and share research and experiences to enhance its readers’ understanding of all aspects of the roles and responsibilities of Customs. The World Customs Journal is published electronically, twice a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信