两个坚忍主义大帐篷的承诺和问题

Q3 Arts and Humanities

Symposion Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5840/symposion2022919

Alyssa Lowery

{"title":"两个坚忍主义大帐篷的承诺和问题","authors":"Alyssa Lowery","doi":"10.5840/symposion2022919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stoicism’s tremendous recent popularity provides an opportunity to update the tradition for a contemporary audience. In this paper, I review one such update: Stoicism’s conception as a ‘big tent,’ first as depicted by two prominent figures in contemporary Stoicism – Ryan Holiday and Massimo Pigliucci – then how it fares in light of two challenges, Stoic Resignation and Stoic Reductionism. I conclude by arguing for a self-determination that emphasizes Stoic ethical commitments and attends to its social features, even at the cost of such a big tent.","PeriodicalId":37705,"journal":{"name":"Symposion","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Promises and Problems of Two Stoic Big Tents\",\"authors\":\"Alyssa Lowery\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/symposion2022919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Stoicism’s tremendous recent popularity provides an opportunity to update the tradition for a contemporary audience. In this paper, I review one such update: Stoicism’s conception as a ‘big tent,’ first as depicted by two prominent figures in contemporary Stoicism – Ryan Holiday and Massimo Pigliucci – then how it fares in light of two challenges, Stoic Resignation and Stoic Reductionism. I conclude by arguing for a self-determination that emphasizes Stoic ethical commitments and attends to its social features, even at the cost of such a big tent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Symposion\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Symposion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/symposion2022919\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symposion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/symposion2022919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

斯多葛主义最近的巨大流行为当代观众提供了更新传统的机会。在本文中，我回顾了一个这样的更新:斯多葛主义作为一个“大帐篷”的概念，首先是由当代斯多葛主义的两位杰出人物——瑞安·霍乐迪和马西莫·皮柳奇——描述的，然后是它在两个挑战下的表现，斯多葛辞职和斯多葛简化论。最后，我主张一种自我决定，强调斯多葛派的伦理承诺，并关注其社会特征，即使要付出这么大的代价。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Promises and Problems of Two Stoic Big Tents

Stoicism’s tremendous recent popularity provides an opportunity to update the tradition for a contemporary audience. In this paper, I review one such update: Stoicism’s conception as a ‘big tent,’ first as depicted by two prominent figures in contemporary Stoicism – Ryan Holiday and Massimo Pigliucci – then how it fares in light of two challenges, Stoic Resignation and Stoic Reductionism. I conclude by arguing for a self-determination that emphasizes Stoic ethical commitments and attends to its social features, even at the cost of such a big tent.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Symposion Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6 weeks

期刊介绍： Symposion was published for the first time in 2003, as Symposion – Revistă de științe socio-umane (Symposion – A Journal of Humanities), with the purpose of providing a supportive space for academic communication, dialogue, and debate, both intra and interdisciplinary, for philosophical humanities and social and political sciences. Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences shares essentially the same purpose. Its main aim is to promote and provide open access to peer-reviewed, high quality contributions (articles, discussion notes, review essays or book reviews) in philosophy, other humanities, and social and political sciences connected with philosophy.