针灸相关干预治疗输卵管阻塞性不孕症的比较疗效:随机对照试验的系统回顾和贝叶斯荟萃分析。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Wenrui Huang , Jing Ling , Xingzi Fang , Xingyan Ou , XueLian Du
{"title":"针灸相关干预治疗输卵管阻塞性不孕症的比较疗效:随机对照试验的系统回顾和贝叶斯荟萃分析。","authors":"Wenrui Huang ,&nbsp;Jing Ling ,&nbsp;Xingzi Fang ,&nbsp;Xingyan Ou ,&nbsp;XueLian Du","doi":"10.1016/j.ctim.2023.103003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Tubal obstructive infertility (TOI) is a challenging condition affecting many women worldwide. Acupuncture and herbal medicine have emerged as potential therapeutic options for enhancing fertility outcomes in these patients. However, the evidence regarding their efficacy remains inconclusive, necessitating a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Computer searches were conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP Information, Wanfang Database, and China Biology Medicine (CBM) databases to retrieve relevant literature on the efficacy and safety of acupuncture and related therapies for the treatment of tubal obstructive infertility. The search period extended from the inception of the databases to December 2022. Two researchers independently screened the literature based on strict inclusion criteria, extracted relevant data, and utilized Cochrane Collaboration tools and the Jadad scale to comprehensively assess the quality of the included studies. Subsequently, pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis were performed using statistical software such as StataSE and Rstudio, and graphical representations were generated to present the results.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>The network meta-analysis included 1580 articles, with 23 meeting the criteria. These studies involved 2355 patients and explored 13 intervention measures. Acupuncture-related therapies outperformed control interventions in improving pregnancy rates, tubal patency rates, and overall effectiveness while demonstrating a lower incidence of adverse events. EA+CHM was identified as the most effective for pregnancy rates, MOX for tubal patency rates, and MOX+AP for overall effectiveness. The safety profile of acupuncture-related interventions was acceptable. These findings support acupuncture-related therapies as effective and safe options for tubal obstructive infertility management. Further high-quality research is needed to validate and expand upon these results.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These findings offer novel treatment strategies for acupuncture-related interventions, providing practitioners with evidence-based guidance. Addressing limitations through future research is crucial, including diverse literature, emphasizing higher-quality RCTs, and exploring a broader range of interventions with long-term follow-up data. Systematic assessment of adverse events, standardized techniques, and robust ranking methods should be considered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10545,"journal":{"name":"Complementary therapies in medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229923000900/pdfft?md5=3e76616763f2e414e9ad3c22748e3217&pid=1-s2.0-S0965229923000900-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficacy of acupuncture-related interventions for tubal obstructive infertility: A systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"Wenrui Huang ,&nbsp;Jing Ling ,&nbsp;Xingzi Fang ,&nbsp;Xingyan Ou ,&nbsp;XueLian Du\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctim.2023.103003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Tubal obstructive infertility (TOI) is a challenging condition affecting many women worldwide. Acupuncture and herbal medicine have emerged as potential therapeutic options for enhancing fertility outcomes in these patients. However, the evidence regarding their efficacy remains inconclusive, necessitating a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Computer searches were conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP Information, Wanfang Database, and China Biology Medicine (CBM) databases to retrieve relevant literature on the efficacy and safety of acupuncture and related therapies for the treatment of tubal obstructive infertility. The search period extended from the inception of the databases to December 2022. Two researchers independently screened the literature based on strict inclusion criteria, extracted relevant data, and utilized Cochrane Collaboration tools and the Jadad scale to comprehensively assess the quality of the included studies. Subsequently, pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis were performed using statistical software such as StataSE and Rstudio, and graphical representations were generated to present the results.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>The network meta-analysis included 1580 articles, with 23 meeting the criteria. These studies involved 2355 patients and explored 13 intervention measures. Acupuncture-related therapies outperformed control interventions in improving pregnancy rates, tubal patency rates, and overall effectiveness while demonstrating a lower incidence of adverse events. EA+CHM was identified as the most effective for pregnancy rates, MOX for tubal patency rates, and MOX+AP for overall effectiveness. The safety profile of acupuncture-related interventions was acceptable. These findings support acupuncture-related therapies as effective and safe options for tubal obstructive infertility management. Further high-quality research is needed to validate and expand upon these results.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These findings offer novel treatment strategies for acupuncture-related interventions, providing practitioners with evidence-based guidance. Addressing limitations through future research is crucial, including diverse literature, emphasizing higher-quality RCTs, and exploring a broader range of interventions with long-term follow-up data. Systematic assessment of adverse events, standardized techniques, and robust ranking methods should be considered.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Complementary therapies in medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229923000900/pdfft?md5=3e76616763f2e414e9ad3c22748e3217&pid=1-s2.0-S0965229923000900-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Complementary therapies in medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229923000900\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary therapies in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229923000900","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:输卵管阻塞性不孕症(TOI)是一种影响全球许多女性的具有挑战性的疾病。针灸和草药已成为提高这些患者生育结果的潜在治疗选择。然而,关于其疗效的证据仍然不确定,需要进行全面的系统回顾和荟萃分析。方法:计算机检索PubMed、Cochrane、Embase、Web of Science、中国知网(CNKI)、维普信息、万方数据库、中国生物医学(CBM)数据库,检索针灸及相关疗法治疗输卵管阻塞性不孕症的疗效和安全性相关文献。搜索期从数据库建立之初一直延伸到2022年12月。两位研究者根据严格的纳入标准独立筛选文献,提取相关资料,并利用Cochrane协作工具和Jadad量表对纳入研究的质量进行综合评价。随后使用StataSE、Rstudio等统计软件进行两两元分析和网络元分析,并生成图形表示结果。结果:网络meta分析纳入1580篇文章,其中23篇符合标准。本研究共纳入2355例患者,探讨了13项干预措施。针灸相关疗法在提高妊娠率、输卵管通畅率和总体有效性方面优于对照干预,同时显示出更低的不良事件发生率。EA+CHM对妊娠率最有效,MOX对输卵管通畅率最有效,MOX+AP对总疗效最有效。针灸相关干预措施的安全性是可以接受的。这些发现支持针灸相关疗法作为输卵管阻塞性不孕症治疗的有效和安全的选择。需要进一步的高质量研究来验证和扩展这些结果。结论:这些发现为针灸相关干预提供了新的治疗策略,为从业者提供了循证指导。通过未来的研究解决局限性是至关重要的,包括多样化的文献,强调高质量的随机对照试验,并通过长期随访数据探索更广泛的干预措施。应考虑不良事件的系统评估、标准化技术和可靠的排名方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative efficacy of acupuncture-related interventions for tubal obstructive infertility: A systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Tubal obstructive infertility (TOI) is a challenging condition affecting many women worldwide. Acupuncture and herbal medicine have emerged as potential therapeutic options for enhancing fertility outcomes in these patients. However, the evidence regarding their efficacy remains inconclusive, necessitating a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

Method

Computer searches were conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP Information, Wanfang Database, and China Biology Medicine (CBM) databases to retrieve relevant literature on the efficacy and safety of acupuncture and related therapies for the treatment of tubal obstructive infertility. The search period extended from the inception of the databases to December 2022. Two researchers independently screened the literature based on strict inclusion criteria, extracted relevant data, and utilized Cochrane Collaboration tools and the Jadad scale to comprehensively assess the quality of the included studies. Subsequently, pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis were performed using statistical software such as StataSE and Rstudio, and graphical representations were generated to present the results.

Result

The network meta-analysis included 1580 articles, with 23 meeting the criteria. These studies involved 2355 patients and explored 13 intervention measures. Acupuncture-related therapies outperformed control interventions in improving pregnancy rates, tubal patency rates, and overall effectiveness while demonstrating a lower incidence of adverse events. EA+CHM was identified as the most effective for pregnancy rates, MOX for tubal patency rates, and MOX+AP for overall effectiveness. The safety profile of acupuncture-related interventions was acceptable. These findings support acupuncture-related therapies as effective and safe options for tubal obstructive infertility management. Further high-quality research is needed to validate and expand upon these results.

Conclusion

These findings offer novel treatment strategies for acupuncture-related interventions, providing practitioners with evidence-based guidance. Addressing limitations through future research is crucial, including diverse literature, emphasizing higher-quality RCTs, and exploring a broader range of interventions with long-term follow-up data. Systematic assessment of adverse events, standardized techniques, and robust ranking methods should be considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Complementary therapies in medicine
Complementary therapies in medicine 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
101
审稿时长
112 days
期刊介绍: Complementary Therapies in Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed journal that has considerable appeal to anyone who seeks objective and critical information on complementary therapies or who wishes to deepen their understanding of these approaches. It will be of particular interest to healthcare practitioners including family practitioners, complementary therapists, nurses, and physiotherapists; to academics including social scientists and CAM researchers; to healthcare managers; and to patients. Complementary Therapies in Medicine aims to publish valid, relevant and rigorous research and serious discussion articles with the main purpose of improving healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信