学校团队处理学校外部期望以改善学校的规范策略

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
A. Wullschleger, Ariane Rickenbacher, B. Rechsteiner, U. Grob, Katharina Maag Merki
{"title":"学校团队处理学校外部期望以改善学校的规范策略","authors":"A. Wullschleger, Ariane Rickenbacher, B. Rechsteiner, U. Grob, Katharina Maag Merki","doi":"10.1177/00345237221090540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"School-external expectations regarding implementation of reforms and innovations often do not lead to successful school improvement processes in schools. To better understand these processes in schools, this paper aims to investigate school improvement processes on a deep level by focusing on cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational regulation strategies used by school teams and by exploring what school-external and school-internal factors are related to this strategy use. Principals, teachers, and specialist teachers ( N = 1328) at 59 primary schools responded to an online questionnaire indicating their school’s use of regulation strategies on school improvement. Results from descriptive, variance, and hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed that school teams use all forms of school-based regulation strategies but that schools differ significantly in their strategy use. These differences were mainly explained more by school-internal deeper structures (e.g., task cohesion) and less by school-internal surface structures (e.g., school size) and not at all by school-external factors (e.g., governance systems).","PeriodicalId":45813,"journal":{"name":"Research in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"School teams’ regulation strategies for dealing with school-external expectations for school improvement\",\"authors\":\"A. Wullschleger, Ariane Rickenbacher, B. Rechsteiner, U. Grob, Katharina Maag Merki\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00345237221090540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"School-external expectations regarding implementation of reforms and innovations often do not lead to successful school improvement processes in schools. To better understand these processes in schools, this paper aims to investigate school improvement processes on a deep level by focusing on cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational regulation strategies used by school teams and by exploring what school-external and school-internal factors are related to this strategy use. Principals, teachers, and specialist teachers ( N = 1328) at 59 primary schools responded to an online questionnaire indicating their school’s use of regulation strategies on school improvement. Results from descriptive, variance, and hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed that school teams use all forms of school-based regulation strategies but that schools differ significantly in their strategy use. These differences were mainly explained more by school-internal deeper structures (e.g., task cohesion) and less by school-internal surface structures (e.g., school size) and not at all by school-external factors (e.g., governance systems).\",\"PeriodicalId\":45813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00345237221090540\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00345237221090540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学校外部对实施改革和创新的期望往往不会导致学校改进过程的成功。为了更好地理解学校中的这些过程,本文旨在通过关注学校团队使用的认知、元认知和动机调节策略,以及探索与这些策略使用相关的学校外部和学校内部因素,来深入研究学校改进过程。59所小学的校长、教师和专业教师(N = 1328)回答了一份在线问卷,表明他们的学校在学校改进方面使用了监管策略。描述性、方差和分层多元回归分析的结果显示,学校团队使用所有形式的校本管理策略,但学校在策略使用方面存在显著差异。这些差异主要是由学校内部深层结构(如任务凝聚力)和学校内部表面结构(如学校规模)来解释的,而不是由学校外部因素(如治理系统)来解释的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
School teams’ regulation strategies for dealing with school-external expectations for school improvement
School-external expectations regarding implementation of reforms and innovations often do not lead to successful school improvement processes in schools. To better understand these processes in schools, this paper aims to investigate school improvement processes on a deep level by focusing on cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational regulation strategies used by school teams and by exploring what school-external and school-internal factors are related to this strategy use. Principals, teachers, and specialist teachers ( N = 1328) at 59 primary schools responded to an online questionnaire indicating their school’s use of regulation strategies on school improvement. Results from descriptive, variance, and hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed that school teams use all forms of school-based regulation strategies but that schools differ significantly in their strategy use. These differences were mainly explained more by school-internal deeper structures (e.g., task cohesion) and less by school-internal surface structures (e.g., school size) and not at all by school-external factors (e.g., governance systems).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Education
Research in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: Research in Education has an established focus on the sociology and psychology of education and gives increased emphasis to current practical issues of direct interest to those in the teaching profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信