老年痴呆筛查量表的编制、信度和效度

中国临床心理学杂志 Pub Date : 2010-12-24 DOI:10.2174/978160805186111001010082

Zao-huo Cheng, De-Liang Cai, Da Li, Liang Liu, Hai-Yan Yu, Ping Li

{"title":"老年痴呆筛查量表的编制、信度和效度","authors":"Zao-huo Cheng, De-Liang Cai, Da Li, Liang Liu, Hai-Yan Yu, Ping Li","doi":"10.2174/978160805186111001010082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To develop a Dementia Screening Inventory for Elderly (DSI-E) and examine it’s reliability and validity. Methods: In the light of rating model of MMSE and ADL, a screening inventory was developed to assess cognitive abilities, daily activities, and mental and personality changes for elderly, which contained 55 items across 11 areas. Two thousand eight hundred and fifteen community elderly were interviewed with the DSI-E; out of them, two hundred and fifteen were retested after two weeks, one hundred ninety-nine were assessed with MMSE, ADL, MMAS, and CCAS. Results: The stability coefficient, split-half reliability, and Cronbach's α coefficient were 0.96, 0.91, and 0.85 respectively; The DSI-E was significantly correlated with MMSE (r=0.92), ADL (r=0.89), MMAS (r=0.71), and CCAS (r=0.63). Factor analysis got three factors accounting for 60.1% of variance, which were named cognitive ability, daily activity, and psychopathology. Conclusion: The stability, internal consistency, and validity of the DSI-E are good and meet with psychometric standard.","PeriodicalId":9967,"journal":{"name":"中国临床心理学杂志","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development, Reliability and Validity of Dementia Screening Inventory for Elderly\",\"authors\":\"Zao-huo Cheng, De-Liang Cai, Da Li, Liang Liu, Hai-Yan Yu, Ping Li\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/978160805186111001010082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To develop a Dementia Screening Inventory for Elderly (DSI-E) and examine it’s reliability and validity. Methods: In the light of rating model of MMSE and ADL, a screening inventory was developed to assess cognitive abilities, daily activities, and mental and personality changes for elderly, which contained 55 items across 11 areas. Two thousand eight hundred and fifteen community elderly were interviewed with the DSI-E; out of them, two hundred and fifteen were retested after two weeks, one hundred ninety-nine were assessed with MMSE, ADL, MMAS, and CCAS. Results: The stability coefficient, split-half reliability, and Cronbach's α coefficient were 0.96, 0.91, and 0.85 respectively; The DSI-E was significantly correlated with MMSE (r=0.92), ADL (r=0.89), MMAS (r=0.71), and CCAS (r=0.63). Factor analysis got three factors accounting for 60.1% of variance, which were named cognitive ability, daily activity, and psychopathology. Conclusion: The stability, internal consistency, and validity of the DSI-E are good and meet with psychometric standard.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国临床心理学杂志\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国临床心理学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/978160805186111001010082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国临床心理学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/978160805186111001010082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:编制老年人痴呆筛查量表(DSI-E)，并对其信效度进行检验。方法:参照MMSE和ADL评分模型，编制老年人认知能力、日常活动、心理和人格变化筛查量表，共11个领域55个项目。采用DSI-E对2815名社区老年人进行了访谈;其中215例在两周后重新进行测试，199例进行MMSE、ADL、MMAS和CCAS评估。结果:稳定性系数为0.96，分半信度为0.91,Cronbach’s α系数为0.85;DSI-E与MMSE (r=0.92)、ADL (r=0.89)、MMAS (r=0.71)、CCAS (r=0.63)显著相关。因子分析得到认知能力、日常活动和精神病理三个因素占方差的60.1%。结论:DSI-E量表的稳定性、内部一致性和效度较好，符合心理测量标准。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Development, Reliability and Validity of Dementia Screening Inventory for Elderly

Objective: To develop a Dementia Screening Inventory for Elderly (DSI-E) and examine it’s reliability and validity. Methods: In the light of rating model of MMSE and ADL, a screening inventory was developed to assess cognitive abilities, daily activities, and mental and personality changes for elderly, which contained 55 items across 11 areas. Two thousand eight hundred and fifteen community elderly were interviewed with the DSI-E; out of them, two hundred and fifteen were retested after two weeks, one hundred ninety-nine were assessed with MMSE, ADL, MMAS, and CCAS. Results: The stability coefficient, split-half reliability, and Cronbach's α coefficient were 0.96, 0.91, and 0.85 respectively; The DSI-E was significantly correlated with MMSE (r=0.92), ADL (r=0.89), MMAS (r=0.71), and CCAS (r=0.63). Factor analysis got three factors accounting for 60.1% of variance, which were named cognitive ability, daily activity, and psychopathology. Conclusion: The stability, internal consistency, and validity of the DSI-E are good and meet with psychometric standard.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

中国临床心理学杂志

自引率

0.00%

发文量

5595

期刊介绍： Founded in 1993, Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology is under the supervision of the Ministry of Education of China and organized by China Mental Health Association. The journal mainly publishes original research reports on various subdisciplines of clinical psychology in China, as well as reviews reflecting the hot spots and dynamics of clinical psychology research at home and abroad. There are columns on basic and experimental research, psychological testing and assessment, pathological psychology, health psychology, psychotherapy and counseling. The main readers are scientific and technical personnel, postgraduate students, and clinical workers engaged in scientific research and practical activities in clinical psychology, applied psychology, and mental health in universities, research institutes, and key medical and healthcare organizations.